Remote presentation of thesis and final postgraduate works during the COVID-19 pandemic: are there advantages in the non-face-to-face presentations?
Introduction: The COVID-19 pandemic limited in person presentation of final works and theses for the completion of specializations, masters and doctorates. Objective: To describe the experience in remote presentations of summative essays and thesis. Materials and methods: A qualitative-qua...
Guardado en:
| Autores principales: | , , , , , |
|---|---|
| Formato: | Artículo revista |
| Lenguaje: | Español |
| Publicado: |
Universidad Nacional Cba. Facultad de Ciencias Médicas. Secretaria de Ciencia y Tecnología
2021
|
| Materias: | |
| Acceso en línea: | https://revistas.unc.edu.ar/index.php/med/article/view/33144 |
| Aporte de: |
| id |
I10-R10-article-33144 |
|---|---|
| record_format |
ojs |
| institution |
Universidad Nacional de Córdoba |
| institution_str |
I-10 |
| repository_str |
R-10 |
| container_title_str |
Revistas de la UNC |
| language |
Español |
| format |
Artículo revista |
| topic |
covid-19 online learning distance education universities postgraduate COVID-19 aprendizaje en línea educación a distancia universidades posgrado COVID-19 aprendizagem online educação a distância universidades pós-graduação |
| spellingShingle |
covid-19 online learning distance education universities postgraduate COVID-19 aprendizaje en línea educación a distancia universidades posgrado COVID-19 aprendizagem online educação a distância universidades pós-graduação Soto Perez, Amanda Raquel Eymann, Alfredo Ladenheim, Roberta Reboiras, Fabiana Durante, Eduardo Figari, Marcelo Remote presentation of thesis and final postgraduate works during the COVID-19 pandemic: are there advantages in the non-face-to-face presentations? |
| topic_facet |
covid-19 online learning distance education universities postgraduate COVID-19 aprendizaje en línea educación a distancia universidades posgrado COVID-19 aprendizagem online educação a distância universidades pós-graduação |
| author |
Soto Perez, Amanda Raquel Eymann, Alfredo Ladenheim, Roberta Reboiras, Fabiana Durante, Eduardo Figari, Marcelo |
| author_facet |
Soto Perez, Amanda Raquel Eymann, Alfredo Ladenheim, Roberta Reboiras, Fabiana Durante, Eduardo Figari, Marcelo |
| author_sort |
Soto Perez, Amanda Raquel |
| title |
Remote presentation of thesis and final postgraduate works during the COVID-19 pandemic: are there advantages in the non-face-to-face presentations? |
| title_short |
Remote presentation of thesis and final postgraduate works during the COVID-19 pandemic: are there advantages in the non-face-to-face presentations? |
| title_full |
Remote presentation of thesis and final postgraduate works during the COVID-19 pandemic: are there advantages in the non-face-to-face presentations? |
| title_fullStr |
Remote presentation of thesis and final postgraduate works during the COVID-19 pandemic: are there advantages in the non-face-to-face presentations? |
| title_full_unstemmed |
Remote presentation of thesis and final postgraduate works during the COVID-19 pandemic: are there advantages in the non-face-to-face presentations? |
| title_sort |
remote presentation of thesis and final postgraduate works during the covid-19 pandemic: are there advantages in the non-face-to-face presentations? |
| description |
Introduction: The COVID-19 pandemic limited in person presentation of final works and theses for the completion of specializations, masters and doctorates.
Objective: To describe the experience in remote presentations of summative essays and thesis.
Materials and methods: A qualitative-quantitative cross-sectional study was carried out. Perceptions of graduates and examiner board members were explored through a questionnaire.
Results: 54 presentations were included: 53.7% specializations, 40.7% masters and 5.6% doctorates. The average audience number was 34 and distance to the university was 273.6 km. 116 professionals answered: graduates 28.4% and examiner board members 71.6%. They were female gender in 51.5% and 36.1%, respectively. 100% of graduates and 96.3% of examiner board members believed that they were able to present the results of the investigation, and only 3% and 7.3%, respectively, reported technical difficulties. Positive aspects identified by graduates were higher comfort (45.5%), and greater audience number (36.4%); while the examiner board members identified preventing transportation (37,8%) and taking advantage of technologies (35,4%). Graduates identified as negative aspects audience invisibility (33.3%), and potential threat of technical difficulties (27.3%); whilst the examiner board members identified none (31,7%), and potential threat of technical difficulties (20,7%).
Conclusion: Remote presentations were successful for graduates and examiner board members, and allowed to continue and finish academic postgraduate training. |
| publisher |
Universidad Nacional Cba. Facultad de Ciencias Médicas. Secretaria de Ciencia y Tecnología |
| publishDate |
2021 |
| url |
https://revistas.unc.edu.ar/index.php/med/article/view/33144 |
| work_keys_str_mv |
AT sotoperezamandaraquel remotepresentationofthesisandfinalpostgraduateworksduringthecovid19pandemicarethereadvantagesinthenonfacetofacepresentations AT eymannalfredo remotepresentationofthesisandfinalpostgraduateworksduringthecovid19pandemicarethereadvantagesinthenonfacetofacepresentations AT ladenheimroberta remotepresentationofthesisandfinalpostgraduateworksduringthecovid19pandemicarethereadvantagesinthenonfacetofacepresentations AT reboirasfabiana remotepresentationofthesisandfinalpostgraduateworksduringthecovid19pandemicarethereadvantagesinthenonfacetofacepresentations AT duranteeduardo remotepresentationofthesisandfinalpostgraduateworksduringthecovid19pandemicarethereadvantagesinthenonfacetofacepresentations AT figarimarcelo remotepresentationofthesisandfinalpostgraduateworksduringthecovid19pandemicarethereadvantagesinthenonfacetofacepresentations AT sotoperezamandaraquel presentacionadistanciadetesisytrabajosfinalesdeposgradodurantelapandemiacovid19hayventajasenpresentacionesnopresenciales AT eymannalfredo presentacionadistanciadetesisytrabajosfinalesdeposgradodurantelapandemiacovid19hayventajasenpresentacionesnopresenciales AT ladenheimroberta presentacionadistanciadetesisytrabajosfinalesdeposgradodurantelapandemiacovid19hayventajasenpresentacionesnopresenciales AT reboirasfabiana presentacionadistanciadetesisytrabajosfinalesdeposgradodurantelapandemiacovid19hayventajasenpresentacionesnopresenciales AT duranteeduardo presentacionadistanciadetesisytrabajosfinalesdeposgradodurantelapandemiacovid19hayventajasenpresentacionesnopresenciales AT figarimarcelo presentacionadistanciadetesisytrabajosfinalesdeposgradodurantelapandemiacovid19hayventajasenpresentacionesnopresenciales AT sotoperezamandaraquel apresentacaoremotadeteseseprojetosfinaisdeposgraduacaoduranteapandemiacovid19havantagensemapresentacoesnaopresenciais AT eymannalfredo apresentacaoremotadeteseseprojetosfinaisdeposgraduacaoduranteapandemiacovid19havantagensemapresentacoesnaopresenciais AT ladenheimroberta apresentacaoremotadeteseseprojetosfinaisdeposgraduacaoduranteapandemiacovid19havantagensemapresentacoesnaopresenciais AT reboirasfabiana apresentacaoremotadeteseseprojetosfinaisdeposgraduacaoduranteapandemiacovid19havantagensemapresentacoesnaopresenciais AT duranteeduardo apresentacaoremotadeteseseprojetosfinaisdeposgraduacaoduranteapandemiacovid19havantagensemapresentacoesnaopresenciais AT figarimarcelo apresentacaoremotadeteseseprojetosfinaisdeposgraduacaoduranteapandemiacovid19havantagensemapresentacoesnaopresenciais |
| first_indexed |
2022-08-20T01:27:53Z |
| last_indexed |
2022-08-20T01:27:53Z |
| _version_ |
1770719103955238912 |
| spelling |
I10-R10-article-331442021-12-29T20:14:46Z Remote presentation of thesis and final postgraduate works during the COVID-19 pandemic: are there advantages in the non-face-to-face presentations? Presentación a distancia de tesis y trabajos finales de Posgrado durante la pandemia COVID-19: ¿hay ventajas en presentaciones no presenciales? Apresentação remota de teses e projetos finais de pós-graduação durante a pandemia COVID-19: há vantagens em apresentações não presenciais? Soto Perez, Amanda Raquel Eymann, Alfredo Ladenheim, Roberta Reboiras, Fabiana Durante, Eduardo Figari, Marcelo covid-19 online learning distance education universities postgraduate COVID-19 aprendizaje en línea educación a distancia universidades posgrado COVID-19 aprendizagem online educação a distância universidades pós-graduação Introduction: The COVID-19 pandemic limited in person presentation of final works and theses for the completion of specializations, masters and doctorates. Objective: To describe the experience in remote presentations of summative essays and thesis. Materials and methods: A qualitative-quantitative cross-sectional study was carried out. Perceptions of graduates and examiner board members were explored through a questionnaire. Results: 54 presentations were included: 53.7% specializations, 40.7% masters and 5.6% doctorates. The average audience number was 34 and distance to the university was 273.6 km. 116 professionals answered: graduates 28.4% and examiner board members 71.6%. They were female gender in 51.5% and 36.1%, respectively. 100% of graduates and 96.3% of examiner board members believed that they were able to present the results of the investigation, and only 3% and 7.3%, respectively, reported technical difficulties. Positive aspects identified by graduates were higher comfort (45.5%), and greater audience number (36.4%); while the examiner board members identified preventing transportation (37,8%) and taking advantage of technologies (35,4%). Graduates identified as negative aspects audience invisibility (33.3%), and potential threat of technical difficulties (27.3%); whilst the examiner board members identified none (31,7%), and potential threat of technical difficulties (20,7%). Conclusion: Remote presentations were successful for graduates and examiner board members, and allowed to continue and finish academic postgraduate training. Introducción: La pandemia por COVID-19 limitó la presentación de trabajos finales y tesis para la finalización de especializaciones, maestrías y doctorado en forma presencial. Objetivo: Describir la experiencia en presentaciones a distancia de trabajos finales integradores y tesis. Materiales y métodos: Estudio cuali-cuantitativo de corte transversal. Se exploraron las percepciones de los graduados y jurados mediante un cuestionario. Resultados: Se incluyeron 54 presentaciones: 53,7% especializaciones, 40,7% maestrías y 5,6% doctorados. El promedio de audiencia fue de 34 personas y la distancia a la universidad fue 273,6 km. Respondieron 116 profesionales: graduados 28,4% y jurados 71,6%. Entre ellos 51,5% y 36,1% eran de género femenino, respectivamente. El 100% de los graduados y el 96,3% de los jurados opinaron que pudieron exponer los resultados de la investigación y solo el 3% y 7,3% respectivamente expresó que existieron dificultades técnicas. Los aspectos positivos identificados por los graduados fueron mayor comodidad (45,5%) y mayor número de audiencia (36,4%); mientras que los jurados identificaron evitar traslados (37,8%) y aprovechamiento de tecnologías (35,4%). Los graduados identificaron como aspectos negativos la invisibilidad de la audiencia (33,3%) y potenciales dificultades técnicas (27,3%); mientras que los jurados no identificaron ninguno (31,7%) y potenciales de dificultades técnicas (20,7%). Conclusión: La modalidad de presentaciones a distancia fue satisfactoria tanto para los graduados como para los jurados y permitió dar continuidad y completar el proceso educativo de las carreras de posgrado. Introdução: A pandemia COVID-19 limitou a apresentação de trabalhos finais e teses para a realização de especializações, mestrados e doutorados presenciais. Objetivo: Descrever a experiência em apresentações remotas de trabalhos e teses integrativas finais. Materiais e métodos: Estudo transversal qualitativo-quantitativo. Exploramos as percepções dos graduados e jurados através de um questionário. Resultados: foram incluídas 54 apresentações: 53,7% especializações, 40,7% mestres e 5,6% doutorados. A média da audiência foi de 34 pessoas e a distância até a universidade de 273,6 km. Responderam 116 profissionais: graduados 28,4% e jurados 71,6%. Entre eles, 51,5% e 36,1% eram do sexo feminino, respectivamente. 100% dos graduados e 96,3% dos jurados opinaram (responderam) que os resultados da investigação foram apresentados e apenas 3% e 7,3%, respectivamente, expressaram que houve dificuldades técnicas. Os aspectos positivos identificados pelos graduados foram maior conforto (45,5%) e maior número de público (36,4%); enquanto os júris identificaram evitar transferências (37,8%) e aproveitar tecnologias (35,4%). Os graduados identificaram a invisibilidade da audiência (33,3%) e potenciais dificuldades técnicas (27,3%) como aspectos negativos; enquanto o júri não identificou nenhuma (31,7%) e potencial para dificuldades técnicas (20,7%). Conclusão: A modalidade de apresentação a distância foi satisfatória tanto para egressos quanto para júri e permitiu a continuidade e concluir o processo formativo das carreiras de pós-graduação. Universidad Nacional Cba. Facultad de Ciencias Médicas. Secretaria de Ciencia y Tecnología 2021-12-28 info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion text/html application/pdf application/pdf application/pdf https://revistas.unc.edu.ar/index.php/med/article/view/33144 Revista de la Facultad de Ciencias Médicas de Córdoba.; Vol. 78 No. 4 (2021); 353-358 Revista de la Facultad de Ciencias Médicas de Córdoba; Vol. 78 Núm. 4 (2021); 353-358 Revista da Faculdade de Ciências Médicas de Córdoba; v. 78 n. 4 (2021); 353-358 1853-0605 0014-6722 10.31053/1853.0605.v78.n4 spa https://revistas.unc.edu.ar/index.php/med/article/view/33144/35636 https://revistas.unc.edu.ar/index.php/med/article/view/33144/36202 https://revistas.unc.edu.ar/index.php/med/article/view/33144/36203 https://revistas.unc.edu.ar/index.php/med/article/view/33144/36204 Derechos de autor 2021 Universidad Nacional de Córdoba http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0 |