Canon and Out Margin in the Argentine Literary System from 1940 to the Present. Literary Space and Construction of Othernesses and Cultural Identities: Juego de espejos: consideraciones y abordajes teóricos en torno a nuestras líneas investigativas
Our research group started working in 2010 whit the name “Representations of Othernesses, Aesthetic Experimentations and Changes in the Argentine Literary System (since 1940 up to the Present)”. We started the study of two concepts: the poetic-literary and discursive genres relationship; and reflect...
Guardado en:
| Autores principales: | , , , |
|---|---|
| Formato: | Artículo revista |
| Lenguaje: | Español |
| Publicado: |
Centro de Investigaciones de la Facultad de Filosofía y Humanidades
2020
|
| Materias: | |
| Acceso en línea: | https://revistas.unc.edu.ar/index.php/recial/article/view/31246 |
| Aporte de: |
| Sumario: | Our research group started working in 2010 whit the name “Representations of Othernesses, Aesthetic Experimentations and Changes in the Argentine Literary System (since 1940 up to the Present)”. We started the study of two concepts: the poetic-literary and discursive genres relationship; and reflection on the problem of identities –as open constructions– in relation to otherness, thinking the importance of writing in the construction of poetic that dialogues with discursive genres. All this from a dialogue between Latin American literary theory –with the concepts Heterogeneity ad Transculturation– and the international theory –with the concepts Otherness, Identity, Subalternity. The temporal choice of our work arises from to the appearance of conflicting images of the other in relation to the self in Argentine History from the 1940s, after political-social conflicts that acquire artistic-cultural correlates. From 2018 the group was called “Canon and Out Margin in the Argentine Literary System from 1940 to the Present. Literary Space and Construction of Otherness and Cultural Identities” working further on the previous research. Thus, questions were emphazised such as the tensions among canon/corpus/archive tensions and the interaction between canons and literary and discursive margins. |
|---|