DELIBERATIVE FEDERALISM: AN OBJECTED MODEL DURING THE PAMPEAN DEMOCRATIC TRANSITION

Mostrar todas las versiones(2)

Towards 1983 after the emergency in Argentina of a new democratic government, new semantic uses of fundamental political terms such as human rights and democracy were put into tension, which began to be discussed during the democratic transition (1979-1983) through the debate among those who support...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autor principal: Olivares, Nicolás Emanuel
Formato: Artículo revista
Lenguaje:Español
Publicado: Facultad de Derecho 2019
Materias:
Recent political history
Monist discourse
Pluralist discourse
Deliberative federalism
Historia política reciente
Discurso monista
Discurso pluralista
Federalismo deliberativo
Acceso en línea:https://revistas.unc.edu.ar/index.php/refade/article/view/27883
Aporte de:
Revistas de la UNC de Universidad Nacional de Córdoba
id I10-R10-article-27883
record_format ojs
spelling I10-R10-article-278832020-03-10T16:37:52Z DELIBERATIVE FEDERALISM: AN OBJECTED MODEL DURING THE PAMPEAN DEMOCRATIC TRANSITION FEDERALISMO DELIBERATIVO: UN MODELO OBJETADO DURANTE LA TRANSICIÓN DEMOCRÁTICA PAMPEANA Olivares, Nicolás Emanuel Recent political history Monist discourse Pluralist discourse Deliberative federalism Historia política reciente Discurso monista Discurso pluralista Federalismo deliberativo Towards 1983 after the emergency in Argentina of a new democratic government, new semantic uses of fundamental political terms such as human rights and democracy were put into tension, which began to be discussed during the democratic transition (1979-1983) through the debate among those who supported a monist political discourse and those who defended a pluralistic political discourse. From the novel Alfonsinist government it was explicitly promoted a federal deliberative discourse, which was paradigmatically made explicit in the reports issued by the Council for the Consolidation of Democracy (CCD) and was presented as a source of a new political grammar. However, the lack of concreteness of these institutional reforms and the adoption of an improper pluralist federalism after the 1994 reform have generated a notable neglect or lack of consideration of these as a topic of investigation of recent Argentinian political history. In this work we will attend to three specific objectives: 1) to reconstruct the context of enunciation and justification of federal deliberative democratic discourse; 2) to identify the institutional designs proposed in the reports issued by the CCD; and 3) to investigate the aporias and practical inconveniences of that deliberative federal discourse. Hacia 1983 tras la emergencia en Argentina de un nuevo gobierno democrático se pusieron en tensión nuevos usos semánticos de términos políticos fundamentales tales como derechos humanos y democracia, los cuales comenzaron a discutirse durante la transición democrática (1979-1983) mediante el debate entre quienes se mostraron partidarios de un discurso político monista y aquellos que defendieron un discurso político pluralista. Desde el novel gobierno alfonsinista se promovió explícitamente un discurso político deliberativo federal, el cual fue paradigmáticamente explicitado en los informes emitidos por el Consejo para la Consolidación de la Democracia (CCD y se presentaba como fuente de una nueva gramática política necesaria para la consolidación democrática. Sin embargo, la no concreción de dichas reformas institucionales y la adopción de un federalismo pluralista impropio tras la reforma de 1994, han generado una notoria desatención o falta de consideración de estas en tanto tópico de investigación de una historia política argentina del pasado reciente. En este trabajo nos proponemos alcanzar tres objetivos específicos:1) reconstruir el contexto de enunciación y justificación de dicho discurso democrático deliberativo federal; 2) identificar los diseños institucionales propuestos en los informes emitidos por el CCD; y 3) indagar en las aporías e inconvenientes prácticos propios de aquel discurso deliberativo federal. Facultad de Derecho 2019-11-29 info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion application/pdf https://revistas.unc.edu.ar/index.php/refade/article/view/27883 Revista de la Facultad de Derecho; Vol. 10 Núm. 2 (2019): NUEVA SERIE II; 136-162 2314-3061 1850-9371 spa https://revistas.unc.edu.ar/index.php/refade/article/view/27883/29171
institution Universidad Nacional de Córdoba
institution_str I-10
repository_str R-10
container_title_str Revistas de la UNC
language Español
format Artículo revista
topic Recent political history
Monist discourse
Pluralist discourse
Deliberative federalism
Historia política reciente
Discurso monista
Discurso pluralista
Federalismo deliberativo
spellingShingle Recent political history
Monist discourse
Pluralist discourse
Deliberative federalism
Historia política reciente
Discurso monista
Discurso pluralista
Federalismo deliberativo
Olivares, Nicolás Emanuel
DELIBERATIVE FEDERALISM: AN OBJECTED MODEL DURING THE PAMPEAN DEMOCRATIC TRANSITION
topic_facet Recent political history
Monist discourse
Pluralist discourse
Deliberative federalism
Historia política reciente
Discurso monista
Discurso pluralista
Federalismo deliberativo
author Olivares, Nicolás Emanuel
author_facet Olivares, Nicolás Emanuel
author_sort Olivares, Nicolás Emanuel
title DELIBERATIVE FEDERALISM: AN OBJECTED MODEL DURING THE PAMPEAN DEMOCRATIC TRANSITION
title_short DELIBERATIVE FEDERALISM: AN OBJECTED MODEL DURING THE PAMPEAN DEMOCRATIC TRANSITION
title_full DELIBERATIVE FEDERALISM: AN OBJECTED MODEL DURING THE PAMPEAN DEMOCRATIC TRANSITION
title_fullStr DELIBERATIVE FEDERALISM: AN OBJECTED MODEL DURING THE PAMPEAN DEMOCRATIC TRANSITION
title_full_unstemmed DELIBERATIVE FEDERALISM: AN OBJECTED MODEL DURING THE PAMPEAN DEMOCRATIC TRANSITION
title_sort deliberative federalism: an objected model during the pampean democratic transition
description Towards 1983 after the emergency in Argentina of a new democratic government, new semantic uses of fundamental political terms such as human rights and democracy were put into tension, which began to be discussed during the democratic transition (1979-1983) through the debate among those who supported a monist political discourse and those who defended a pluralistic political discourse. From the novel Alfonsinist government it was explicitly promoted a federal deliberative discourse, which was paradigmatically made explicit in the reports issued by the Council for the Consolidation of Democracy (CCD) and was presented as a source of a new political grammar. However, the lack of concreteness of these institutional reforms and the adoption of an improper pluralist federalism after the 1994 reform have generated a notable neglect or lack of consideration of these as a topic of investigation of recent Argentinian political history. In this work we will attend to three specific objectives: 1) to reconstruct the context of enunciation and justification of federal deliberative democratic discourse; 2) to identify the institutional designs proposed in the reports issued by the CCD; and 3) to investigate the aporias and practical inconveniences of that deliberative federal discourse.
publisher Facultad de Derecho
publishDate 2019
url https://revistas.unc.edu.ar/index.php/refade/article/view/27883
work_keys_str_mv AT olivaresnicolasemanuel deliberativefederalismanobjectedmodelduringthepampeandemocratictransition
AT olivaresnicolasemanuel federalismodeliberativounmodeloobjetadodurantelatransiciondemocraticapampeana
first_indexed 2022-08-20T01:22:40Z
last_indexed 2022-08-20T01:22:40Z
_version_ 1770718711768940544

Ejemplares similares