Folkloristas y Folklorólogos: the Strategies of Inclusion and Exclusion in the Discourse of the Folklore Magazine (1961-1981)
Published in our country during the ‘boom of folklore’, Folklore magazine was an essential chain gear of the cultural industry mechanisms. However, a more detailed analysis of its discourse reveals two contradictory movements, as an inevitable effect derived from the tensions they crystall...
Guardado en:
| Autor principal: | |
|---|---|
| Formato: | Artículo revista |
| Lenguaje: | Español |
| Publicado: |
Centro de Investigaciones de la Facultad de Filosofía y Humanidades
2019
|
| Materias: | |
| Acceso en línea: | https://revistas.unc.edu.ar/index.php/recial/article/view/26993 |
| Aporte de: |
| id |
I10-R10-article-26993 |
|---|---|
| record_format |
ojs |
| spelling |
I10-R10-article-269932020-07-09T23:15:38Z Folkloristas y Folklorólogos: the Strategies of Inclusion and Exclusion in the Discourse of the Folklore Magazine (1961-1981) Folkloristas y Folklorólogos: las estrategias de inclusión y exclusión en el discurso de la revista Folklore (1961-1981) Parodi, Julia discourse folklore cultural industry heritage magazine discurso folklore industria cultural patrimonio revista Published in our country during the ‘boom of folklore’, Folklore magazine was an essential chain gear of the cultural industry mechanisms. However, a more detailed analysis of its discourse reveals two contradictory movements, as an inevitable effect derived from the tensions they crystallize. On the one hand, an impulse of inclusion where the differences seem to be liquefied as part of the same and homogeneous phenomenon, the one of "our music"; in pursuit of the construction of an identitarian image or "national being" suitable for the demands of a growing market. But on the other hand, the magazine was also a promoter of a clear impulse of exclusion in the hands of the so-called "Science of Folklore" and its authorized specialists, folklorologists, consisted of an attempt to establish the limits and scope of Folklore as national heritage. Costa y Mozejko (2001 y 2002) propose to look into the production conditions in order to find the explanatory hypotheses of the strategies which, consciously or unconsciously, guide each social agent's discourse practices. The inclusion and exclusion impulses in the magazine, could be considered as specific production conditions traces related to the development of the folklore field, and they might help us to understand the constant “rhetoric of loss” that characterize this discourse. Publicada en nuestro país durante pleno auge del “boom del folklore”, la revista Folklore fue un engranaje esencial en la cadena de mecanismos de la industria cultural. Sin embargo, un análisis detenido de su discurso revela dos movimientos contradictorios, como un efecto insalvable derivado de las tensiones que cristaliza. Por un lado, un impulso de inclusión donde parecen licuarse las diferencias como parte de un mismo y homogéneo fenómeno, el de la “música nuestra” en pos de la construcción de una imagen identitaria o “ser nacional” apta para las exigencias de un mercado creciente. Pero por el otro lado, la revista fue también promotora de un claro impulso de exclusión que, a manos de la denominada “Ciencia del Folklore” y de sus especialistas autorizados, los folklorólogos, consistió en un intento por establecer los límites y alcances del “Folklore” como patrimonio nacional. Costa y Mozejko (2001 y 2002) proponen buscar en las condiciones de producción las hipótesis explicativas de las estrategias que, consciente o inconscientemente orientan las prácticas discursivas de los agentes sociales. Los impulsos de inclusión y exclusión observados en la revista, podrían considerarse huellas de condiciones sociales de producción muy específicas que atañen al desarrollo del campo del folklore, y que permitirían comprender la constante “retórica de la pérdida” que caracteriza este discurso. Centro de Investigaciones de la Facultad de Filosofía y Humanidades 2019-12-18 info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion application/pdf text/html https://revistas.unc.edu.ar/index.php/recial/article/view/26993 Recial; Vol. 10 Núm. 16 (2019): Dossier: Nuevas articulaciones entre Folclore, Política y Nación en América Latina 2718-658X 1853-4112 10.53971/2718.658x.v10.n16 spa https://revistas.unc.edu.ar/index.php/recial/article/view/26993/28648 https://revistas.unc.edu.ar/index.php/recial/article/view/26993/28649 |
| institution |
Universidad Nacional de Córdoba |
| institution_str |
I-10 |
| repository_str |
R-10 |
| container_title_str |
Revistas de la UNC |
| language |
Español |
| format |
Artículo revista |
| topic |
discourse folklore cultural industry heritage magazine discurso folklore industria cultural patrimonio revista |
| spellingShingle |
discourse folklore cultural industry heritage magazine discurso folklore industria cultural patrimonio revista Parodi, Julia Folkloristas y Folklorólogos: the Strategies of Inclusion and Exclusion in the Discourse of the Folklore Magazine (1961-1981) |
| topic_facet |
discourse folklore cultural industry heritage magazine discurso folklore industria cultural patrimonio revista |
| author |
Parodi, Julia |
| author_facet |
Parodi, Julia |
| author_sort |
Parodi, Julia |
| title |
Folkloristas y Folklorólogos: the Strategies of Inclusion and Exclusion in the Discourse of the Folklore Magazine (1961-1981) |
| title_short |
Folkloristas y Folklorólogos: the Strategies of Inclusion and Exclusion in the Discourse of the Folklore Magazine (1961-1981) |
| title_full |
Folkloristas y Folklorólogos: the Strategies of Inclusion and Exclusion in the Discourse of the Folklore Magazine (1961-1981) |
| title_fullStr |
Folkloristas y Folklorólogos: the Strategies of Inclusion and Exclusion in the Discourse of the Folklore Magazine (1961-1981) |
| title_full_unstemmed |
Folkloristas y Folklorólogos: the Strategies of Inclusion and Exclusion in the Discourse of the Folklore Magazine (1961-1981) |
| title_sort |
folkloristas y folklorólogos: the strategies of inclusion and exclusion in the discourse of the folklore magazine (1961-1981) |
| description |
Published in our country during the ‘boom of folklore’, Folklore magazine was an essential chain gear of the cultural industry mechanisms. However, a more detailed analysis of its discourse reveals two contradictory movements, as an inevitable effect derived from the tensions they crystallize. On the one hand, an impulse of inclusion where the differences seem to be liquefied as part of the same and homogeneous phenomenon, the one of "our music"; in pursuit of the construction of an identitarian image or "national being" suitable for the demands of a growing market. But on the other hand, the magazine was also a promoter of a clear impulse of exclusion in the hands of the so-called "Science of Folklore" and its authorized specialists, folklorologists, consisted of an attempt to establish the limits and scope of Folklore as national heritage. Costa y Mozejko (2001 y 2002) propose to look into the production conditions in order to find the explanatory hypotheses of the strategies which, consciously or unconsciously, guide each social agent's discourse practices. The inclusion and exclusion impulses in the magazine, could be considered as specific production conditions traces related to the development of the folklore field, and they might help us to understand the constant “rhetoric of loss” that characterize this discourse. |
| publisher |
Centro de Investigaciones de la Facultad de Filosofía y Humanidades |
| publishDate |
2019 |
| url |
https://revistas.unc.edu.ar/index.php/recial/article/view/26993 |
| work_keys_str_mv |
AT parodijulia folkloristasyfolklorologosthestrategiesofinclusionandexclusioninthediscourseofthefolkloremagazine19611981 AT parodijulia folkloristasyfolklorologoslasestrategiasdeinclusionyexclusioneneldiscursodelarevistafolklore19611981 |
| first_indexed |
2022-08-20T01:13:26Z |
| last_indexed |
2022-08-20T01:13:26Z |
| _version_ |
1770717967013642240 |