Histomorphometric comparison of BIO-OSS vs. Osteodens in maxilar elevation procedures
The loss of dental elements can lead to excessive bone loss in the maxillary posterior maxillary segments, which can limit the placement of dental implants in said area. Of the wide range of grafting materials available, one of the most exhaustively studied and with the best clinical and histologica...
Guardado en:
| Autor principal: | |
|---|---|
| Formato: | Artículo revista |
| Lenguaje: | Español |
| Publicado: |
Universidad Nacional Cba. Facultad de Ciencias Médicas. Secretaria de Ciencia y Tecnología
2019
|
| Materias: | |
| Acceso en línea: | https://revistas.unc.edu.ar/index.php/med/article/view/25764 |
| Aporte de: |
| id |
I10-R10-article-25764 |
|---|---|
| record_format |
ojs |
| institution |
Universidad Nacional de Córdoba |
| institution_str |
I-10 |
| repository_str |
R-10 |
| container_title_str |
Revistas de la UNC |
| language |
Español |
| format |
Artículo revista |
| topic |
Bio-Oss maxillary sinus graft histomorphometry Bio-Oss seno maxilar injerto histomorfometría |
| spellingShingle |
Bio-Oss maxillary sinus graft histomorphometry Bio-Oss seno maxilar injerto histomorfometría Mariani, FM Histomorphometric comparison of BIO-OSS vs. Osteodens in maxilar elevation procedures |
| topic_facet |
Bio-Oss maxillary sinus graft histomorphometry Bio-Oss seno maxilar injerto histomorfometría |
| author |
Mariani, FM |
| author_facet |
Mariani, FM |
| author_sort |
Mariani, FM |
| title |
Histomorphometric comparison of BIO-OSS vs. Osteodens in maxilar elevation procedures |
| title_short |
Histomorphometric comparison of BIO-OSS vs. Osteodens in maxilar elevation procedures |
| title_full |
Histomorphometric comparison of BIO-OSS vs. Osteodens in maxilar elevation procedures |
| title_fullStr |
Histomorphometric comparison of BIO-OSS vs. Osteodens in maxilar elevation procedures |
| title_full_unstemmed |
Histomorphometric comparison of BIO-OSS vs. Osteodens in maxilar elevation procedures |
| title_sort |
histomorphometric comparison of bio-oss vs. osteodens in maxilar elevation procedures |
| description |
The loss of dental elements can lead to excessive bone loss in the maxillary posterior maxillary segments, which can limit the placement of dental implants in said area. Of the wide range of grafting materials available, one of the most exhaustively studied and with the best clinical and histological results is bovine hydroxyapatite. Hypothesis: The use of Osteodens would lead to the formation of bone suitable for implant placement after a healing period of 6 to 8 months in maxillary sinus floor elevation procedures using the lateral window technique in a similar way. could be expected with Bio-Oss.
The objective of this investigation was to measure regenerated viable bone tissue histomorphologically in maxillary sinus augmentation procedures after a period of 6 to 8 months of healing using as bovine hydroxyapatite graft material from 2 different brands (Osteodens and Bio-Oss), and to assess the capacity of Osteodens as a graft material apt to be used efficiently in maxillary sinus lift procedures.
A total of 17 maxillary sinus augmentations were performed (n = 8 Osteodens, n = 9 Bio-Oss), after a healing period of 6 to 8 months a block was taken from the grafted area by means of the use of trephines and analyzed by histomorphometry.
Percentages of neoformed bone tissue was higher for Bio-Oss (39.0% + 11.1) compared to Osteodens (33.4% + 8.3) the remaining graft values were somewhat lower in Bio-Oss with respect to Osteodens (16.3% + 11.2 and 20.8% + 12.1 respectively). The proportion of connective tissue was similar in the two groups (44.7% Bio-Oss and 45.8% Osteodens). With respect to the analyzed variables age, gender and residual height of the sinus floor, the results showed no statistically significant differences.
Within the limitations of this study it can be concluded that both materials used (Bio-Oss and Osteodens) as graft material in maxillary sinus lift procedures did not show statistically significant differences in the ability to regenerate bone tissue suitable for placement of implants after 6 months of healing. Other studies with greater number of samples should be carried out to validate these results. |
| publisher |
Universidad Nacional Cba. Facultad de Ciencias Médicas. Secretaria de Ciencia y Tecnología |
| publishDate |
2019 |
| url |
https://revistas.unc.edu.ar/index.php/med/article/view/25764 |
| work_keys_str_mv |
AT marianifm histomorphometriccomparisonofbioossvsosteodensinmaxilarelevationprocedures AT marianifm comparacionhistomorfometricadebioossvsosteodensenprocedimientosdeelevaciondesenomaxilar |
| first_indexed |
2022-08-20T01:26:42Z |
| last_indexed |
2022-08-20T01:26:42Z |
| _version_ |
1770719014594543616 |
| spelling |
I10-R10-article-257642019-11-11T21:18:27Z Histomorphometric comparison of BIO-OSS vs. Osteodens in maxilar elevation procedures Comparación histomorfométrica de BIO-OSS vs. Osteodens en procedimientos de elevación de seno maxilar Mariani, FM Bio-Oss maxillary sinus graft histomorphometry Bio-Oss seno maxilar injerto histomorfometría The loss of dental elements can lead to excessive bone loss in the maxillary posterior maxillary segments, which can limit the placement of dental implants in said area. Of the wide range of grafting materials available, one of the most exhaustively studied and with the best clinical and histological results is bovine hydroxyapatite. Hypothesis: The use of Osteodens would lead to the formation of bone suitable for implant placement after a healing period of 6 to 8 months in maxillary sinus floor elevation procedures using the lateral window technique in a similar way. could be expected with Bio-Oss. The objective of this investigation was to measure regenerated viable bone tissue histomorphologically in maxillary sinus augmentation procedures after a period of 6 to 8 months of healing using as bovine hydroxyapatite graft material from 2 different brands (Osteodens and Bio-Oss), and to assess the capacity of Osteodens as a graft material apt to be used efficiently in maxillary sinus lift procedures. A total of 17 maxillary sinus augmentations were performed (n = 8 Osteodens, n = 9 Bio-Oss), after a healing period of 6 to 8 months a block was taken from the grafted area by means of the use of trephines and analyzed by histomorphometry. Percentages of neoformed bone tissue was higher for Bio-Oss (39.0% + 11.1) compared to Osteodens (33.4% + 8.3) the remaining graft values were somewhat lower in Bio-Oss with respect to Osteodens (16.3% + 11.2 and 20.8% + 12.1 respectively). The proportion of connective tissue was similar in the two groups (44.7% Bio-Oss and 45.8% Osteodens). With respect to the analyzed variables age, gender and residual height of the sinus floor, the results showed no statistically significant differences. Within the limitations of this study it can be concluded that both materials used (Bio-Oss and Osteodens) as graft material in maxillary sinus lift procedures did not show statistically significant differences in the ability to regenerate bone tissue suitable for placement of implants after 6 months of healing. Other studies with greater number of samples should be carried out to validate these results. La pérdida de elementos dentarios pueden conducir a una excesiva pérdida ósea en los segmentos postero superiores maxilares, lo cual puede limitar la colocación de implantes dentales en dicha zona. De los materiales de injertos disponibles uno de los más estudiados y con mejores resultados clínicos e histológicos es la hidroxiapatita bovina. Hipótesis: El empleo de Osteodens conduciría a la neo formación de hueso apto para la colocación de implantes luego de un periodo de cicatrización de 6 a 8 meses en procedimientos de elevación de piso de seno maxilar de una manera similar que podría esperarse con Bio-Oss. Los objetivos del trabajo fueron: Medir histomorfológicamente el tejido óseo viable regenerado en procedimientos de aumento de seno maxilar luego de un periodo de 6 a 8 meses de cicatrización utilizando como material de injerto hidroxiapatita bovina de 2 marcas diferentes (Osteodens y Bio-Oss),y valorar la capacidad de Osteodens como material de injerto apto para ser empleado de manera eficiente en los procedimientos de elevación de seno maxilar. Se realizaron 17 aumentos de seno maxilar (n=8 Osteodens, n=9 Bio-Oss), luego de un periodo de cicatrización de 6 a 8 meses se tomó un bloque de la zona injertada mediante el uso de trefina y se analizó hitologicamente. Los porcentajes de tejido oseo neoformado fue mayor para Bio-Oss (39,0% + 11,1) con respecto a Osteodens en 20,8% + 12,1 (33,4% + 8,3) el valor de injerto remanente fue en Bio-Oss 16,3% + 11,2 y el tejido conectivo fue 44.7% y 45,8% respectivamente. Las variables analizadas edad, genero y altura de residual del piso de seno los resultados no mostraron diferencias estadísticamente significativas. Se puede concluir que ambos materiales utilizados (Bio-Oss y Osteodens) no mostraron diferencias estadísticamente significativas en la capacidad de regenerar tejido óseo apto para la colocación de implantes luego de 6 meses de cicatrización, por lo tanto pueden ser empleados en forma segura y eficiente en dichos procedimientos. Universidad Nacional Cba. Facultad de Ciencias Médicas. Secretaria de Ciencia y Tecnología 2019-10-16 info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion application/pdf https://revistas.unc.edu.ar/index.php/med/article/view/25764 Revista de la Facultad de Ciencias Médicas de Córdoba.; 2019: Suplemento JIC XX Revista de la Facultad de Ciencias Médicas de Córdoba; 2019: Suplemento JIC XX Revista da Faculdade de Ciências Médicas de Córdoba; 2019: Suplemento JIC XX 1853-0605 0014-6722 spa https://revistas.unc.edu.ar/index.php/med/article/view/25764/27477 Derechos de autor 2019 Universidad Nacional de Córdoba |