Critical questioning to Philosophical Anthropology. List of notes and issues about alternative writings
We propose to discuss the nature of the Philosophical Anthropology field, its current developments and the issues arisen in the practice of academic discipline. Which are the omitted issues, the enunciation and argumentation modes, the historical-political themes from which the PA future development...
Guardado en:
| Autores principales: | , |
|---|---|
| Formato: | Artículo revista |
| Lenguaje: | Español |
| Publicado: |
Centro de Investigaciones de la Facultad de Filosofía y Humanidades
2019
|
| Materias: | |
| Acceso en línea: | https://revistas.unc.edu.ar/index.php/intersticios/article/view/25078 |
| Aporte de: |
| id |
I10-R10-article-25078 |
|---|---|
| record_format |
ojs |
| institution |
Universidad Nacional de Córdoba |
| institution_str |
I-10 |
| repository_str |
R-10 |
| container_title_str |
Revistas de la UNC |
| language |
Español |
| format |
Artículo revista |
| topic |
Philosophical Anthropology- Practical Philosophy- Writings- Essays-Manifests Antropología Filosófica- Filosofía práctica- Escrituras- Ensayos- Manifiestos |
| spellingShingle |
Philosophical Anthropology- Practical Philosophy- Writings- Essays-Manifests Antropología Filosófica- Filosofía práctica- Escrituras- Ensayos- Manifiestos Arpini, Adriana María Ripamonti, Paula Critical questioning to Philosophical Anthropology. List of notes and issues about alternative writings |
| topic_facet |
Philosophical Anthropology- Practical Philosophy- Writings- Essays-Manifests Antropología Filosófica- Filosofía práctica- Escrituras- Ensayos- Manifiestos |
| author |
Arpini, Adriana María Ripamonti, Paula |
| author_facet |
Arpini, Adriana María Ripamonti, Paula |
| author_sort |
Arpini, Adriana María |
| title |
Critical questioning to Philosophical Anthropology. List of notes and issues about alternative writings |
| title_short |
Critical questioning to Philosophical Anthropology. List of notes and issues about alternative writings |
| title_full |
Critical questioning to Philosophical Anthropology. List of notes and issues about alternative writings |
| title_fullStr |
Critical questioning to Philosophical Anthropology. List of notes and issues about alternative writings |
| title_full_unstemmed |
Critical questioning to Philosophical Anthropology. List of notes and issues about alternative writings |
| title_sort |
critical questioning to philosophical anthropology. list of notes and issues about alternative writings |
| description |
We propose to discuss the nature of the Philosophical Anthropology field, its current developments and the issues arisen in the practice of academic discipline. Which are the omitted issues, the enunciation and argumentation modes, the historical-political themes from which the PA future development emerges? On the other hand, we seek to face traditional writing modalities and introduce new possibilities from essays, manifesto practices and re-writings of history. The philosophical task has a long history of starting and restarting, and it can be read in different ways. From each philosophical position, different ideologies, values, subjectiveness, bodies, time periods showing problems and concepts, maps and territories can be read. This means that philosophical texts have marks, wounds, fissures, cracks, gestures and silences. A traditional definition says that philosophy can be divided into theory and practice. This classification criterion includes not only the object of interest, but also the philosophical problems and questions that it seeks to answer. We are interested in pointing out that this division is an effective way of organizing philosophical knowledge and that it determines philosophical questions, writings and viewpoints, legitimating textuality and argumentation for each one. In this sense, our thinking covers the awareness that PA is introduced in the area of philosophical practice which, without turning the theoretical dimension back, considers that the concern for historical experiences and political subjectivity mode place it in the interstitial, non-dissociative axis between theory and action. |
| publisher |
Centro de Investigaciones de la Facultad de Filosofía y Humanidades |
| publishDate |
2019 |
| url |
https://revistas.unc.edu.ar/index.php/intersticios/article/view/25078 |
| work_keys_str_mv |
AT arpiniadrianamaria criticalquestioningtophilosophicalanthropologylistofnotesandissuesaboutalternativewritings AT ripamontipaula criticalquestioningtophilosophicalanthropologylistofnotesandissuesaboutalternativewritings AT arpiniadrianamaria interpelacionescriticasalaantropologiafilosoficaagendadeproblemasynotassobreescriturasalternativas AT ripamontipaula interpelacionescriticasalaantropologiafilosoficaagendadeproblemasynotassobreescriturasalternativas |
| first_indexed |
2022-08-20T01:14:19Z |
| last_indexed |
2022-08-20T01:14:19Z |
| _version_ |
1770718038180495360 |
| spelling |
I10-R10-article-250782019-12-23T14:11:59Z Critical questioning to Philosophical Anthropology. List of notes and issues about alternative writings Interpelaciones críticas a la antropología filosófica. Agenda de problemas y notas sobre escrituras alternativas. Arpini, Adriana María Ripamonti, Paula Philosophical Anthropology- Practical Philosophy- Writings- Essays-Manifests Antropología Filosófica- Filosofía práctica- Escrituras- Ensayos- Manifiestos We propose to discuss the nature of the Philosophical Anthropology field, its current developments and the issues arisen in the practice of academic discipline. Which are the omitted issues, the enunciation and argumentation modes, the historical-political themes from which the PA future development emerges? On the other hand, we seek to face traditional writing modalities and introduce new possibilities from essays, manifesto practices and re-writings of history. The philosophical task has a long history of starting and restarting, and it can be read in different ways. From each philosophical position, different ideologies, values, subjectiveness, bodies, time periods showing problems and concepts, maps and territories can be read. This means that philosophical texts have marks, wounds, fissures, cracks, gestures and silences. A traditional definition says that philosophy can be divided into theory and practice. This classification criterion includes not only the object of interest, but also the philosophical problems and questions that it seeks to answer. We are interested in pointing out that this division is an effective way of organizing philosophical knowledge and that it determines philosophical questions, writings and viewpoints, legitimating textuality and argumentation for each one. In this sense, our thinking covers the awareness that PA is introduced in the area of philosophical practice which, without turning the theoretical dimension back, considers that the concern for historical experiences and political subjectivity mode place it in the interstitial, non-dissociative axis between theory and action. Proponemos poner en discusión la índole del campo disciplinar de la Antropología filosófica (AF), de sus desarrollos en la actualidad y de los problemas que interpelan la práctica disciplinar académica. ¿Cuáles son los problemas silenciados, los modos de enunciación y argumentación, las tramas histórico-políticas de las que emergen los desarrollos de la AF porvenir? Por otra parte, buscamos confrontar modalidades de escritura tradicionales e inscribir posibles aperturas desde prácticas de manifiesto, narrativas y ensayísticas-gestuales. El quehacer filosófico tiene una larga historia de comienzos y recomienzos, es susceptible de diversas lecturas. Desde cada posicionamiento filosófico es posible leer ideologías, valoraciones, su(b)jetividades, cuerpos, tiempos que expresan problemas y conceptos, mapas y territorios. Esto significa que posee marcas, heridas, fisuras, grietas, gestos y silencios. Una clasificación tradicional sostiene que la filosofía puede dividirse en teórica y práctica, según su objeto de estudio. Recorre nuestra reflexión el convencimiento de que la AF se inscribe en el terreno de una filosofía práctica, que sin dar la espalda a la dimensión teórica, considera que la preocupación por las experiencias históricas y los modos de subjetividad política, la sitúan en el eje intersticial, no disociativo, entre de la teoría y la acción. Centro de Investigaciones de la Facultad de Filosofía y Humanidades 2019-12-21 info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion application/pdf https://revistas.unc.edu.ar/index.php/intersticios/article/view/25078 Interstices of politics and culture. Latin American interventions; Vol. 8 No. 16 (2019): Racism, Negritude and Gender: Africa, Latin America and the Caribbean; 127-142 Intersticios de la política y la cultura. Intervenciones latinoamericanas; Vol. 8 Núm. 16 (2019): Racismo, negritud y género: África, América Latina y el Caribe; 127-142 Intersticipações de política e cultura. Intervenções na América Latina; v. 8 n. 16 (2019): Racismo, Negritude e Género: África, América Latina e Caribe.; 127-142 2250-6543 spa https://revistas.unc.edu.ar/index.php/intersticios/article/view/25078/28757 Derechos de autor 2019 Intersticios de la política y la cultura. Intervenciones latinoamericanas |