Indigenous People and the State around the Conservation of Nature: the Case of the Territory of the Potae Napocna Navogoh Community and the Lands of the Pilcomayo River National Park

In this work we aim to address the question on the relationship between indigenous peoples and nature conservation, regarding the overlap between the territory of the Potae Napocna Navogoh community and the lands of the Pilcomayo River National Park (province of Formosa, Argentina). In particular, o...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autor principal: Iñigo Carrera, Valeria
Formato: Artículo revista
Lenguaje:Español
Publicado: Facultad de Filosofía y Humanidades. Museo de Antropología 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://revistas.unc.edu.ar/index.php/antropologia/article/view/23873
Aporte de:
id I10-R10-article-23873
record_format ojs
institution Universidad Nacional de Córdoba
institution_str I-10
repository_str R-10
container_title_str Revistas de la UNC
language Español
format Artículo revista
topic Pueblos indígenas
Estado
Territorio
Conservación de la naturaleza
Formosa
Antropología social
Indigenous People
State
Territory
Nature Conservation
Formosa
Social Anthropology
Povos indígenas
Estado
Território
Conservação da natureza
Formosa
Antropología social
spellingShingle Pueblos indígenas
Estado
Territorio
Conservación de la naturaleza
Formosa
Antropología social
Indigenous People
State
Territory
Nature Conservation
Formosa
Social Anthropology
Povos indígenas
Estado
Território
Conservação da natureza
Formosa
Antropología social
Iñigo Carrera, Valeria
Indigenous People and the State around the Conservation of Nature: the Case of the Territory of the Potae Napocna Navogoh Community and the Lands of the Pilcomayo River National Park
topic_facet Pueblos indígenas
Estado
Territorio
Conservación de la naturaleza
Formosa
Antropología social
Indigenous People
State
Territory
Nature Conservation
Formosa
Social Anthropology
Povos indígenas
Estado
Território
Conservação da natureza
Formosa
Antropología social
author Iñigo Carrera, Valeria
author_facet Iñigo Carrera, Valeria
author_sort Iñigo Carrera, Valeria
title Indigenous People and the State around the Conservation of Nature: the Case of the Territory of the Potae Napocna Navogoh Community and the Lands of the Pilcomayo River National Park
title_short Indigenous People and the State around the Conservation of Nature: the Case of the Territory of the Potae Napocna Navogoh Community and the Lands of the Pilcomayo River National Park
title_full Indigenous People and the State around the Conservation of Nature: the Case of the Territory of the Potae Napocna Navogoh Community and the Lands of the Pilcomayo River National Park
title_fullStr Indigenous People and the State around the Conservation of Nature: the Case of the Territory of the Potae Napocna Navogoh Community and the Lands of the Pilcomayo River National Park
title_full_unstemmed Indigenous People and the State around the Conservation of Nature: the Case of the Territory of the Potae Napocna Navogoh Community and the Lands of the Pilcomayo River National Park
title_sort indigenous people and the state around the conservation of nature: the case of the territory of the potae napocna navogoh community and the lands of the pilcomayo river national park
description In this work we aim to address the question on the relationship between indigenous peoples and nature conservation, regarding the overlap between the territory of the Potae Napocna Navogoh community and the lands of the Pilcomayo River National Park (province of Formosa, Argentina). In particular, our purpose is to clarify the link between the development of protected natural areas and the production of an essentially differential indigenous subjectivity. To do this, we begin by examining the tension that manifests itself within the policy followed by the states (national and provincial) between the valorisation of capital and nature conservation. Then, we characterize the ways in which indigenous peoples are produced by the mentioned states in the provincial political scene. Finally, we study the case of the conflict resulting from the above mentioned overlap, based on the analysis of a meeting held in 2007 between the qom and various state agents.
publisher Facultad de Filosofía y Humanidades. Museo de Antropología
publishDate 2020
url https://revistas.unc.edu.ar/index.php/antropologia/article/view/23873
work_keys_str_mv AT inigocarreravaleria indigenouspeopleandthestatearoundtheconservationofnaturethecaseoftheterritoryofthepotaenapocnanavogohcommunityandthelandsofthepilcomayorivernationalpark
AT inigocarreravaleria pueblosindigenasyestadoentornoalaconservaciondelanaturalezaelcasodelacomunidadpotaenapocnanavogohyelparquenacionalriopilcomayo
AT inigocarreravaleria povosindigenaseoestadoemtornodaconservacaodanaturezaocasodoterritoriodacomunidadepotaenapocnanavogoheasterrasdoparquenacionaldoriopilcomayo
first_indexed 2022-08-20T01:12:02Z
last_indexed 2022-08-20T01:12:02Z
_version_ 1770717847690936320
spelling I10-R10-article-238732021-06-18T17:30:58Z Indigenous People and the State around the Conservation of Nature: the Case of the Territory of the Potae Napocna Navogoh Community and the Lands of the Pilcomayo River National Park Pueblos indígenas y Estado en torno a la conservación de la naturaleza: el caso de la comunidad Potae Napocna Navogoh y el Parque Nacional Río Pilcomayo Povos indígenas e o Estado em torno da conservação da natureza: o caso do território da comunidade Potae Napocna Navogoh e as terras do Parque Nacional do Rio Pilcomayo Iñigo Carrera, Valeria Pueblos indígenas Estado Territorio Conservación de la naturaleza Formosa Antropología social Indigenous People State Territory Nature Conservation Formosa Social Anthropology Povos indígenas Estado Território Conservação da natureza Formosa Antropología social In this work we aim to address the question on the relationship between indigenous peoples and nature conservation, regarding the overlap between the territory of the Potae Napocna Navogoh community and the lands of the Pilcomayo River National Park (province of Formosa, Argentina). In particular, our purpose is to clarify the link between the development of protected natural areas and the production of an essentially differential indigenous subjectivity. To do this, we begin by examining the tension that manifests itself within the policy followed by the states (national and provincial) between the valorisation of capital and nature conservation. Then, we characterize the ways in which indigenous peoples are produced by the mentioned states in the provincial political scene. Finally, we study the case of the conflict resulting from the above mentioned overlap, based on the analysis of a meeting held in 2007 between the qom and various state agents. En el presente trabajo nos proponemos abordar la pregunta por la relación entre los pueblos indígenas y la conservación de la naturaleza, a propósito de la superposición entre el territorio de la comunidad Potae Napocna Navogoh y las tierras del Parque Nacional Río Pilcomayo (provincia de Formosa, Argentina). En particular, nuestro objeto es clarificar el vínculo entre el desarrollo de áreas naturales protegidas y la producción de una subjetividad indígena esencialmente diferencial. Para ello, comenzamos por examinar la tensión que se manifiesta al interior de la política seguida por los Estados (nacional y provincial) entre la valorización del capital y aquella conservación. Luego, caracterizamos las maneras en que los pueblos indígenas son producidos por los mencionados Estados en el escenario político provincial. Finalmente, estudiamos el caso del conflicto producto de la mencionada superposición, a partir del análisis de una reunión sostenida en el año 2007 entre los qom y distintos agentes del Estado. Neste artigo propomos abordar a questão da relação entre os povos indígenas e a conservação da natureza, no que se refere à sobreposição entre o território da comunidade Potae Napocna Navogoh e as terras do Parque Nacional do Río Pilcomayo (província de Formosa, Argentina). Em particular, nosso objetivo é esclarecer a ligação entre o desenvolvimento de áreas naturais protegidas e a produção de uma subjetividade indígena essencialmente diferencial. Para isso, começamos por examinar a tensão que se manifesta na política seguida pelos Estados (nacionais e provinciais) entre a valorização do capital e essa conservação. Em seguida, caracterizamos as formas como os povos indígenas são produzidos pelos referidos Estados no cenário político provincial. Por fim, estudamos o caso do conflito decorrente da referida sobreposição, com base na análise de uma reunião realizada em 2007 entre os Qom e diversos agentes do Estado. Facultad de Filosofía y Humanidades. Museo de Antropología 2020-08-30 info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion Peer reviewed article Artículo revisado por pares Artigo revisado por pares application/pdf https://revistas.unc.edu.ar/index.php/antropologia/article/view/23873 Revista del Museo de Antropología; Vol 13 (2020) ISSUE 2; 175-188 Revista del Museo de Antropología; Vol 13 (2020) NÚMERO 2; 175-188 Revista del Museo de Antropología; Vol 13 (2020) NÚMERO 2; 175-188 1852-4826 1852-060X 10.31048/1852.4826.v13.n2 spa https://revistas.unc.edu.ar/index.php/antropologia/article/view/23873/30853 Argentina Argentina Argentina Derechos de autor 2020 Valeria Iñigo Carrera https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0