Stroke. are there any difference between patients with or without patent foramen ovale in left atrial appendage systolic function?

Mostrar todas las versiones(2)

Introduction: The aim of this study was to evaluate the systolic function of the left atrial appendage (LAA) in a group with and without patent foramen ovale (PFO) who suffered ischemic cerebrovascular events.Material and methods: Between September 2010 and October 2011, 17 patients were referred fo...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Contreras, Alejandro E., Perrote, Federico, Concari, Ignacio, Brenna, Eduardo J., Lucero, Cecilia
Formato: Artículo revista
Lenguaje:Español
Publicado: Universidad Nacional Cba. Facultad de Ciencias Médicas. Secretaria de Ciencia y Tecnología 2012
Materias:
accidente cerebrovascular
foramen oval permeable
función sistólica
orejuela auricular izquierda
stroke
patent foramen ovale
systolic function
left atrial appendage
Acceso en línea:https://revistas.unc.edu.ar/index.php/med/article/view/20882
Aporte de:
Revistas de la UNC de Universidad Nacional de Córdoba
id I10-R10-article-20882
record_format ojs
institution Universidad Nacional de Córdoba
institution_str I-10
repository_str R-10
container_title_str Revistas de la UNC
language Español
format Artículo revista
topic accidente cerebrovascular
foramen oval permeable
función sistólica
orejuela auricular izquierda
stroke
patent foramen ovale
systolic function
left atrial appendage
spellingShingle accidente cerebrovascular
foramen oval permeable
función sistólica
orejuela auricular izquierda
stroke
patent foramen ovale
systolic function
left atrial appendage
Contreras, Alejandro E.
Perrote, Federico
Concari, Ignacio
Brenna, Eduardo J.
Lucero, Cecilia
Stroke. are there any difference between patients with or without patent foramen ovale in left atrial appendage systolic function?
topic_facet accidente cerebrovascular
foramen oval permeable
función sistólica
orejuela auricular izquierda
stroke
patent foramen ovale
systolic function
left atrial appendage
author Contreras, Alejandro E.
Perrote, Federico
Concari, Ignacio
Brenna, Eduardo J.
Lucero, Cecilia
author_facet Contreras, Alejandro E.
Perrote, Federico
Concari, Ignacio
Brenna, Eduardo J.
Lucero, Cecilia
author_sort Contreras, Alejandro E.
title Stroke. are there any difference between patients with or without patent foramen ovale in left atrial appendage systolic function?
title_short Stroke. are there any difference between patients with or without patent foramen ovale in left atrial appendage systolic function?
title_full Stroke. are there any difference between patients with or without patent foramen ovale in left atrial appendage systolic function?
title_fullStr Stroke. are there any difference between patients with or without patent foramen ovale in left atrial appendage systolic function?
title_full_unstemmed Stroke. are there any difference between patients with or without patent foramen ovale in left atrial appendage systolic function?
title_sort stroke. are there any difference between patients with or without patent foramen ovale in left atrial appendage systolic function?
description Introduction: The aim of this study was to evaluate the systolic function of the left atrial appendage (LAA) in a group with and without patent foramen ovale (PFO) who suffered ischemic cerebrovascular events.Material and methods: Between September 2010 and October 2011, 17 patients were referred for transesophageal echocardiography (TEE) after suffering a stroke. PFO was defined as the passage of at least one bubble through atrial septum with bubble test. We compared systolic velocity in the appendage between patients with and without PFO and a control group.Results: Were 8 women and 9 men, mean age 54.1 ± 19.5 years and 8 patients were under 55 years of age. All patients had suffered a ischemic cerebrovascular events, 41.2% had stroke, 52.9% transient ischemic attack and amaurosis fugax 5.9%. In the assessment of TEE, 11.8% had atrial septal aneurysm and 35.3% PFO. Mean LAA systolic velocity was 66.3 ± 20.3 cm / sec. There was no difference in systolic velocity of the LAA between patients with and without PFO (67.5 ± 11.8 cm / sec vs 65.7 ± 24.3 cm / sec respectively, p = 0.87). The control group of 8 patients, 5 women and 3 men, mean age 39.5 ± 18 years, had a LAA systolic velocity of 77.6 ± 28.9 cm / sec, no significant differences with ischemic patients.Conclusion: There were no differences in systolic function of the LAA between patients with and without PFO with ischemic cerebrovascular event.
publisher Universidad Nacional Cba. Facultad de Ciencias Médicas. Secretaria de Ciencia y Tecnología
publishDate 2012
url https://revistas.unc.edu.ar/index.php/med/article/view/20882
work_keys_str_mv AT contrerasalejandroe strokearethereanydifferencebetweenpatientswithorwithoutpatentforamenovaleinleftatrialappendagesystolicfunction
AT perrotefederico strokearethereanydifferencebetweenpatientswithorwithoutpatentforamenovaleinleftatrialappendagesystolicfunction
AT concariignacio strokearethereanydifferencebetweenpatientswithorwithoutpatentforamenovaleinleftatrialappendagesystolicfunction
AT brennaeduardoj strokearethereanydifferencebetweenpatientswithorwithoutpatentforamenovaleinleftatrialappendagesystolicfunction
AT lucerocecilia strokearethereanydifferencebetweenpatientswithorwithoutpatentforamenovaleinleftatrialappendagesystolicfunction
AT contrerasalejandroe accidentecerebrovascularexistendiferenciasenlafuncionsistolicadelaorejueladelaauriculaizquierdaentrepacientesconysinforamenovalpermeable
AT perrotefederico accidentecerebrovascularexistendiferenciasenlafuncionsistolicadelaorejueladelaauriculaizquierdaentrepacientesconysinforamenovalpermeable
AT concariignacio accidentecerebrovascularexistendiferenciasenlafuncionsistolicadelaorejueladelaauriculaizquierdaentrepacientesconysinforamenovalpermeable
AT brennaeduardoj accidentecerebrovascularexistendiferenciasenlafuncionsistolicadelaorejueladelaauriculaizquierdaentrepacientesconysinforamenovalpermeable
AT lucerocecilia accidentecerebrovascularexistendiferenciasenlafuncionsistolicadelaorejueladelaauriculaizquierdaentrepacientesconysinforamenovalpermeable
first_indexed 2022-08-20T01:25:34Z
last_indexed 2022-08-20T01:25:34Z
_version_ 1770718930878332928
spelling I10-R10-article-208822019-05-10T12:48:13Z Stroke. are there any difference between patients with or without patent foramen ovale in left atrial appendage systolic function? Accidente cerebrovascular. ¿existen diferencias en la funcion sistolica de la orejuela de la auricula izquierda entre pacientes con y sin foramen oval permeable? Contreras, Alejandro E. Perrote, Federico Concari, Ignacio Brenna, Eduardo J. Lucero, Cecilia accidente cerebrovascular foramen oval permeable función sistólica orejuela auricular izquierda stroke patent foramen ovale systolic function left atrial appendage Introduction: The aim of this study was to evaluate the systolic function of the left atrial appendage (LAA) in a group with and without patent foramen ovale (PFO) who suffered ischemic cerebrovascular events.Material and methods: Between September 2010 and October 2011, 17 patients were referred for transesophageal echocardiography (TEE) after suffering a stroke. PFO was defined as the passage of at least one bubble through atrial septum with bubble test. We compared systolic velocity in the appendage between patients with and without PFO and a control group.Results: Were 8 women and 9 men, mean age 54.1 ± 19.5 years and 8 patients were under 55 years of age. All patients had suffered a ischemic cerebrovascular events, 41.2% had stroke, 52.9% transient ischemic attack and amaurosis fugax 5.9%. In the assessment of TEE, 11.8% had atrial septal aneurysm and 35.3% PFO. Mean LAA systolic velocity was 66.3 ± 20.3 cm / sec. There was no difference in systolic velocity of the LAA between patients with and without PFO (67.5 ± 11.8 cm / sec vs 65.7 ± 24.3 cm / sec respectively, p = 0.87). The control group of 8 patients, 5 women and 3 men, mean age 39.5 ± 18 years, had a LAA systolic velocity of 77.6 ± 28.9 cm / sec, no significant differences with ischemic patients.Conclusion: There were no differences in systolic function of the LAA between patients with and without PFO with ischemic cerebrovascular event. Introducción: El objetivo del presente trabajo fue comparar la función sistólica de la orejuela de la aurícula izquierda (OAI) en un grupo de pacientes con y sin foramen oval permeable (FOP) quienes sufrieron eventos cerebrovasculares isquémicos.Material y métodos: Entre septiembre de 2010 y octubre de 2011, 17 pacientes fueron enviados para la realización de un ecocardiograma transesofágico (ETE) por haber sufrido un accidente cerebrovascular (ACV). Se definió FOP al pasaje de al menos una burbuja a través del septum interauricular con test de burbujas. Se comparó la velocidad sistólica en la orejuela entre los pacientes con y sin FOP y con un grupo control.Resultados: Fueron 8 mujeres y 9 hombres, con una edad media de 54,1 ± 19,5 años. Todos los pacientes habían sufrido un evento cerebrovascular isquémico, el 41,2% habían tenido ACV, el 52,9% crisis isquémica transitoria y el 5,9% amaurosis fugaz. En la evaluación con ETE, el 11,8% tuvo aneurisma del septum interauricular y el 35,3% FOP. La velocidad sistólica media de la OAI fue 66,3 ± 20,3 cm/seg. No hubo diferencia en la velocidad sistólica de la OAI entre pacientes con o sin FOP (67,5 ± 11,8 cm/seg vs 65,7 ± 24,3 cm/seg respectivamente, p= 0,87). El grupo control compuesto por 8 pacientes, 5 mujeres y 3 hombres, con una edad media de 39,5 ± 18 años, tuvo una velocidad sistólica de la OAI de 77,6 ± 28,9 cm/seg, sin diferencias significativas con los pacientes isquémicos.Conclusión: No hubo diferencias en la función sistólica de la OAI entre pacientes con y sin FOP con eventos cerebrovasculares isquemicos. Universidad Nacional Cba. Facultad de Ciencias Médicas. Secretaria de Ciencia y Tecnología 2012-12-10 info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion application/pdf https://revistas.unc.edu.ar/index.php/med/article/view/20882 Revista de la Facultad de Ciencias Médicas de Córdoba.; Vol. 69 No. 4 (2012); 197-201 Revista de la Facultad de Ciencias Médicas de Córdoba; Vol. 69 Núm. 4 (2012); 197-201 Revista da Faculdade de Ciências Médicas de Córdoba; v. 69 n. 4 (2012); 197-201 1853-0605 0014-6722 10.31053/1853.0605.v69.n4 spa https://revistas.unc.edu.ar/index.php/med/article/view/20882/20488 Derechos de autor 2018 Universidad Nacional de Córdoba

Ejemplares similares