The content validity requires to assess not only the clarity and relevance of the items, but also the substantial content

Mostrar todas las versiones(2)

The aim of the study was to use the substantive validity strategy to evaluate the content of the UNIPSICO’s workload scale. 30 workers from Lima (Perú) with undergraduate or graduate studies and with one year of work experience participated. Participants judged the correspondence of the workload ite...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Merino Soto, Cesar, Calderón-De la Cruz, Gustavo, Gil-Monte, Pedro, Arturo, Juárez-García
Formato: Artículo revista
Lenguaje:Español
Publicado: Universidad Nacional de Córdoba 2021
Materias:
Validez sustantiva
validez de contenido
carga de trabajo
factores psicosociales
trabajo
Acceso en línea:https://revistas.unc.edu.ar/index.php/racc/article/view/20547
Aporte de:
Revistas de la UNC de Universidad Nacional de Córdoba
id I10-R10-article-20547
record_format ojs
spelling I10-R10-article-205472021-05-13T15:26:36Z The content validity requires to assess not only the clarity and relevance of the items, but also the substantial content Validez sustantiva en el marco de la validez de contenido: Aplicación en la escala de Carga de Trabajo Merino Soto, Cesar Calderón-De la Cruz, Gustavo Gil-Monte, Pedro Arturo, Juárez-García Validez sustantiva validez de contenido carga de trabajo factores psicosociales trabajo The aim of the study was to use the substantive validity strategy to evaluate the content of the UNIPSICO’s workload scale. 30 workers from Lima (Perú) with undergraduate or graduate studies and with one year of work experience participated. Participants judged the correspondence of the workload items with their construct, and it was also contrasted with other constructs (role conflict, coping and labor self-efficacy); additionally, the clarity of the items was evaluated. High levels of item’s clarity was found; and substantive validity of all items was satisfactory to evaluate the divergence with other constructs. We discuss the importance of including non-expert participants in content validity methods, conceptual differentiation of items, and in constructs associated with psychosocial factors. La validez de contenido requiere evaluar la claridad y relevancia de los ítems, pero el contenido sustancial del mismo también. El objetivo del estudio fue utilizar la estrategia de validez sustantiva para evaluar el contenido de una Escala de Carga de Trabajo. Participaron 30 trabajadores (Lima, Perú), de instrucción superior y con experiencia laboral mayor a un año. Los participantes juzgaron la correspondencia de los ítems con su constructo, y fue también contrastado con otros constructos (conflicto de rol, afrontamiento y autoeficacia laboral); adicionalmente, se evaluó la claridad de los ítems. Se halló niveles elevados de claridad de los ítems; y la validez sustantiva fue satisfactoria para evaluar la divergencia con otros constructos en todos los ítems. Se discute la inclusión de los participantes no-expertos en los métodos de validez de contenido, para la diferenciación conceptual de los ítems, y en constructos asociados a los factores psicosociales. Universidad Nacional de Córdoba 2021-04-24 info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion application/pdf https://revistas.unc.edu.ar/index.php/racc/article/view/20547 Argentinean Journal of Behavioral Sciences; Vol. 13 No. 1 (2021): REVISTA ARGENTINA DE CIENCIAS DEL COMPORTAMIENTO; 81-92 Revista Argentina de Ciencias del Comportamiento; Vol. 13 Núm. 1 (2021): REVISTA ARGENTINA DE CIENCIAS DEL COMPORTAMIENTO; 81-92 1852-4206 10.32348/1852.4206.v13.n1 spa https://revistas.unc.edu.ar/index.php/racc/article/view/20547/33426 Derechos de autor 2021 Cesar Merino Soto, Gustavo Calderón-De la Cruz, Pedro Gil-Monte, Juárez-García Arturo http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
institution Universidad Nacional de Córdoba
institution_str I-10
repository_str R-10
container_title_str Revistas de la UNC
language Español
format Artículo revista
topic Validez sustantiva
validez de contenido
carga de trabajo
factores psicosociales
trabajo
spellingShingle Validez sustantiva
validez de contenido
carga de trabajo
factores psicosociales
trabajo
Merino Soto, Cesar
Calderón-De la Cruz, Gustavo
Gil-Monte, Pedro
Arturo, Juárez-García
The content validity requires to assess not only the clarity and relevance of the items, but also the substantial content
topic_facet Validez sustantiva
validez de contenido
carga de trabajo
factores psicosociales
trabajo
author Merino Soto, Cesar
Calderón-De la Cruz, Gustavo
Gil-Monte, Pedro
Arturo, Juárez-García
author_facet Merino Soto, Cesar
Calderón-De la Cruz, Gustavo
Gil-Monte, Pedro
Arturo, Juárez-García
author_sort Merino Soto, Cesar
title The content validity requires to assess not only the clarity and relevance of the items, but also the substantial content
title_short The content validity requires to assess not only the clarity and relevance of the items, but also the substantial content
title_full The content validity requires to assess not only the clarity and relevance of the items, but also the substantial content
title_fullStr The content validity requires to assess not only the clarity and relevance of the items, but also the substantial content
title_full_unstemmed The content validity requires to assess not only the clarity and relevance of the items, but also the substantial content
title_sort content validity requires to assess not only the clarity and relevance of the items, but also the substantial content
description The aim of the study was to use the substantive validity strategy to evaluate the content of the UNIPSICO’s workload scale. 30 workers from Lima (Perú) with undergraduate or graduate studies and with one year of work experience participated. Participants judged the correspondence of the workload items with their construct, and it was also contrasted with other constructs (role conflict, coping and labor self-efficacy); additionally, the clarity of the items was evaluated. High levels of item’s clarity was found; and substantive validity of all items was satisfactory to evaluate the divergence with other constructs. We discuss the importance of including non-expert participants in content validity methods, conceptual differentiation of items, and in constructs associated with psychosocial factors.
publisher Universidad Nacional de Córdoba
publishDate 2021
url https://revistas.unc.edu.ar/index.php/racc/article/view/20547
work_keys_str_mv AT merinosotocesar thecontentvalidityrequirestoassessnotonlytheclarityandrelevanceoftheitemsbutalsothesubstantialcontent
AT calderondelacruzgustavo thecontentvalidityrequirestoassessnotonlytheclarityandrelevanceoftheitemsbutalsothesubstantialcontent
AT gilmontepedro thecontentvalidityrequirestoassessnotonlytheclarityandrelevanceoftheitemsbutalsothesubstantialcontent
AT arturojuarezgarcia thecontentvalidityrequirestoassessnotonlytheclarityandrelevanceoftheitemsbutalsothesubstantialcontent
AT merinosotocesar validezsustantivaenelmarcodelavalidezdecontenidoaplicacionenlaescaladecargadetrabajo
AT calderondelacruzgustavo validezsustantivaenelmarcodelavalidezdecontenidoaplicacionenlaescaladecargadetrabajo
AT gilmontepedro validezsustantivaenelmarcodelavalidezdecontenidoaplicacionenlaescaladecargadetrabajo
AT arturojuarezgarcia validezsustantivaenelmarcodelavalidezdecontenidoaplicacionenlaescaladecargadetrabajo
AT merinosotocesar contentvalidityrequirestoassessnotonlytheclarityandrelevanceoftheitemsbutalsothesubstantialcontent
AT calderondelacruzgustavo contentvalidityrequirestoassessnotonlytheclarityandrelevanceoftheitemsbutalsothesubstantialcontent
AT gilmontepedro contentvalidityrequirestoassessnotonlytheclarityandrelevanceoftheitemsbutalsothesubstantialcontent
AT arturojuarezgarcia contentvalidityrequirestoassessnotonlytheclarityandrelevanceoftheitemsbutalsothesubstantialcontent
first_indexed 2022-08-20T00:49:46Z
last_indexed 2022-08-20T00:49:46Z
_version_ 1770716135080067072

Ejemplares similares