MATERIALITY AND MEMORY IN THE INSTITUTIONALIZATION OF AN FORMER CLANDESTINE DETENTION CENTER AS A SPACE OF REMEMBRANCE

The work with architectures linked to acts of violence, death and disappearance has a complexity on its own. In the case of former clandestine detention centers in our country, this complexity led to many debates and discussions about how to carry out the institutionalization of “Espacios para la Me...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autor principal: Olmos, María Belén
Formato: Artículo revista
Lenguaje:Español
Publicado: Centro de Investigaciones y Estudios sobre Cultura y Sociedad 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://revistas.unc.edu.ar/index.php/astrolabio/article/view/19207
Aporte de:
id I10-R10-article-19207
record_format ojs
spelling I10-R10-article-192072019-04-16T15:45:59Z MATERIALITY AND MEMORY IN THE INSTITUTIONALIZATION OF AN FORMER CLANDESTINE DETENTION CENTER AS A SPACE OF REMEMBRANCE MATERIALIDAD Y CONSTRUCCIÓN DE MEMORIA EN LA INSTITUCIONALIZACIÓN DE UN “EX” CENTRO CLANDESTINO DE DETENCIÓN (CCD) COMO ESPACIO PARA LA MEMORIA Olmos, María Belén Centro Clandestino de Detención Espacio para la Memoria Materialidad Memoria. Clandestine Detention Center Memory space Remembrance Space Materiality Memory Remembrance. The work with architectures linked to acts of violence, death and disappearance has a complexity on its own. In the case of former clandestine detention centers in our country, this complexity led to many debates and discussions about how to carry out the institutionalization of “Espacios para la Memoria”, remembrance spaces in these places by developing interventions that respect the material characteristics of the architectures while allowing the memory construction.With the objective of analyze the definitions constructed in relation to materiality and its link with the construction of remembrance in the case of the former clandestine detention center Virrey Cevallos in Buenos Aires, in this article we take into consideration the conservation and restoration tasks carried out, the emerging tensions and the spatial sectorizations that are configured. How do you work with the materiality of the former clandestine detention center? Which are the strategies assumed since the intervention in its materiality? Or in any case, what aspects are considered to define an intervention as such? These are some of the questions that the article intends to answer based on the analysis of interviews carried out with workers of this memorial site. El trabajo con las arquitecturas vinculadas a hechos de violencia, muerte y desaparición posee una complejidad que es propia. En el caso de los “ex” CCD en nuestro país, esta complejidad supuso numerosos debates y discusiones respecto de cómo llevar adelante la institucionalización de Espacios para la Memoria en estos lugares desarrollando intervenciones que respetaran las características materiales de las arquitecturas al tiempo que permitieran la construcción de memoria.Con el objetivo de indagar las definiciones construidas en relación con la materialidad y su vínculo con la construcción de memorias en el caso del “ex” CCD Virrey Cevallos, en Ciudad Autónoma de Buenos Aires, en este artículo tomamos en consideración las tareas de conservación y restauración que se llevan adelante, las tensiones que emergen en la tarea y las sectorizaciones espaciales que se configuran. ¿Cómo se trabaja con la materialidad del “ex” CCD? ¿Cuáles son las estrategias asumidas desde la intervención en su materialidad? O en todo caso, ¿qué aspectos se consideran para definir una intervención? Estas son algunas de las preguntas que el artículo se propone responder a partir del análisis de entrevistas realizadas a trabajadoras/es del hoy Espacio para la Memoria. Centro de Investigaciones y Estudios sobre Cultura y Sociedad 2019-01-02 info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion Artículo revisado por pares application/pdf https://revistas.unc.edu.ar/index.php/astrolabio/article/view/19207 Astrolabio; No. 22 (2019): Enero-Junio; 16-44 Astrolabio; Núm. 22 (2019): Enero-Junio; 16-44 Astrolabio; n. 22 (2019): Enero-Junio; 16-44 1668-7515 10.55441/1668.7515.n22 spa https://revistas.unc.edu.ar/index.php/astrolabio/article/view/19207/22717
institution Universidad Nacional de Córdoba
institution_str I-10
repository_str R-10
container_title_str Revistas de la UNC
language Español
format Artículo revista
topic Centro Clandestino de Detención
Espacio para la Memoria
Materialidad
Memoria.
Clandestine Detention Center
Memory space
Remembrance Space
Materiality
Memory
Remembrance.
spellingShingle Centro Clandestino de Detención
Espacio para la Memoria
Materialidad
Memoria.
Clandestine Detention Center
Memory space
Remembrance Space
Materiality
Memory
Remembrance.
Olmos, María Belén
MATERIALITY AND MEMORY IN THE INSTITUTIONALIZATION OF AN FORMER CLANDESTINE DETENTION CENTER AS A SPACE OF REMEMBRANCE
topic_facet Centro Clandestino de Detención
Espacio para la Memoria
Materialidad
Memoria.
Clandestine Detention Center
Memory space
Remembrance Space
Materiality
Memory
Remembrance.
author Olmos, María Belén
author_facet Olmos, María Belén
author_sort Olmos, María Belén
title MATERIALITY AND MEMORY IN THE INSTITUTIONALIZATION OF AN FORMER CLANDESTINE DETENTION CENTER AS A SPACE OF REMEMBRANCE
title_short MATERIALITY AND MEMORY IN THE INSTITUTIONALIZATION OF AN FORMER CLANDESTINE DETENTION CENTER AS A SPACE OF REMEMBRANCE
title_full MATERIALITY AND MEMORY IN THE INSTITUTIONALIZATION OF AN FORMER CLANDESTINE DETENTION CENTER AS A SPACE OF REMEMBRANCE
title_fullStr MATERIALITY AND MEMORY IN THE INSTITUTIONALIZATION OF AN FORMER CLANDESTINE DETENTION CENTER AS A SPACE OF REMEMBRANCE
title_full_unstemmed MATERIALITY AND MEMORY IN THE INSTITUTIONALIZATION OF AN FORMER CLANDESTINE DETENTION CENTER AS A SPACE OF REMEMBRANCE
title_sort materiality and memory in the institutionalization of an former clandestine detention center as a space of remembrance
description The work with architectures linked to acts of violence, death and disappearance has a complexity on its own. In the case of former clandestine detention centers in our country, this complexity led to many debates and discussions about how to carry out the institutionalization of “Espacios para la Memoria”, remembrance spaces in these places by developing interventions that respect the material characteristics of the architectures while allowing the memory construction.With the objective of analyze the definitions constructed in relation to materiality and its link with the construction of remembrance in the case of the former clandestine detention center Virrey Cevallos in Buenos Aires, in this article we take into consideration the conservation and restoration tasks carried out, the emerging tensions and the spatial sectorizations that are configured. How do you work with the materiality of the former clandestine detention center? Which are the strategies assumed since the intervention in its materiality? Or in any case, what aspects are considered to define an intervention as such? These are some of the questions that the article intends to answer based on the analysis of interviews carried out with workers of this memorial site.
publisher Centro de Investigaciones y Estudios sobre Cultura y Sociedad
publishDate 2019
url https://revistas.unc.edu.ar/index.php/astrolabio/article/view/19207
work_keys_str_mv AT olmosmariabelen materialityandmemoryintheinstitutionalizationofanformerclandestinedetentioncenterasaspaceofremembrance
AT olmosmariabelen materialidadyconstrucciondememoriaenlainstitucionalizaciondeunexcentroclandestinodedetencionccdcomoespacioparalamemoria
first_indexed 2022-08-20T00:48:37Z
last_indexed 2022-08-20T00:48:37Z
_version_ 1770716044974882816