Parliamentary Debate over National Territories’ Provincialization: Citizenship in Times of Classic Peronism (1946-1955)
Abstract:In the following article we analyze the interparty discussion that took place in the Chamber of National Deputies following provincialization projects of national territories presented by Peronism between 1951 and 1955. The Peronism proposed gradually turn the national territories into prov...
Guardado en:
| Autor principal: | |
|---|---|
| Formato: | Artículo revista |
| Lenguaje: | Español |
| Publicado: |
Facultad de Filosofía y Humanidades. Escuela de Historia
2017
|
| Materias: | |
| Acceso en línea: | https://revistas.unc.edu.ar/index.php/anuariohistoria/article/view/14294 |
| Aporte de: |
| id |
I10-R10-article-14294 |
|---|---|
| record_format |
ojs |
| spelling |
I10-R10-article-142942017-06-24T21:22:31Z Parliamentary Debate over National Territories’ Provincialization: Citizenship in Times of Classic Peronism (1946-1955) Debates en torno a la provincialización de los territorios nacionales: la ciudadanía en tiempos del peronismo clásico (1946-1955) Rodas, Matias Eduardo Provincialización Territorios nacionales Peronismo Radicalismo Ciudadanía Provincialization – National Territories – Peronism – Radicalism – Citizenship Abstract:In the following article we analyze the interparty discussion that took place in the Chamber of National Deputies following provincialization projects of national territories presented by Peronism between 1951 and 1955. The Peronism proposed gradually turn the national territories into provinces, transforming La Pampa and Chaco in 1951, then Misiones in 1953 and in 1955 Formosa, Río Negro, Neuquén, and a new province formed by Santa Cruz, Tierra del Fuego, the Antarctic portion and South Atlantic Islands. Instead, the opposition, led by Radicalism, postulated an extensive provincialization to all territories simul-taneously. We argue that one of the causes of this differentiation was in the differing conceptions of citizenship that held these supporters groups: while the Peronism advocated a citizenship based on the social as a starting point for obtaining political rights, radicalism advocated a defined from the political citizenship as the basis and foundation for more progress on substantive rights. En el siguiente artículo analizamos la discusión interpartidaria que tuvo lugar en la Cámara de Diputados Nacionales a raíz de los proyectos de provincialización de los territorios nacionales presentados por el peronismo entre 1951 y 1955. El peronismo proponía convertir gradualmente a los territorios nacionales en provincias, provincializando a La Pampa y Chaco en 1951, luego a Misiones en 1953, y en1955 aFormosa, Río Negro, Neuquén, Santa Cruz y Tierra del Fuego. En cambio, la oposición, encabezada por el radicalismo, proponía una provincialización extensiva a todos los territorios simultáneamente. Argumentamos que una de las causas de esta diferenciación se hallaba en las concepciones discrepantes de la ciudadanía que tenían estos grupos partidarios: mientras el peronismo defendía una ciudadanía con base en lo social como punto de partida para la obtención de derechos políticos, el radicalismo defendía una ciudadanía definida desde lo político, como base y fundamento para el avance sobre derechos más sustantivos. Facultad de Filosofía y Humanidades. Escuela de Historia 2017-01-01 info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion application/pdf https://revistas.unc.edu.ar/index.php/anuariohistoria/article/view/14294 Anuario de la Escuela de Historia Virtual; Núm. 10 (2016); 46-69 1853-7049 10.31049/1853.7049.v0.n10 spa https://revistas.unc.edu.ar/index.php/anuariohistoria/article/view/14294/16281 Derechos de autor 2017 matias Eduardo rodas |
| institution |
Universidad Nacional de Córdoba |
| institution_str |
I-10 |
| repository_str |
R-10 |
| container_title_str |
Revistas de la UNC |
| language |
Español |
| format |
Artículo revista |
| topic |
Provincialización Territorios nacionales Peronismo Radicalismo Ciudadanía Provincialization – National Territories – Peronism – Radicalism – Citizenship |
| spellingShingle |
Provincialización Territorios nacionales Peronismo Radicalismo Ciudadanía Provincialization – National Territories – Peronism – Radicalism – Citizenship Rodas, Matias Eduardo Parliamentary Debate over National Territories’ Provincialization: Citizenship in Times of Classic Peronism (1946-1955) |
| topic_facet |
Provincialización Territorios nacionales Peronismo Radicalismo Ciudadanía Provincialization – National Territories – Peronism – Radicalism – Citizenship |
| author |
Rodas, Matias Eduardo |
| author_facet |
Rodas, Matias Eduardo |
| author_sort |
Rodas, Matias Eduardo |
| title |
Parliamentary Debate over National Territories’ Provincialization: Citizenship in Times of Classic Peronism (1946-1955) |
| title_short |
Parliamentary Debate over National Territories’ Provincialization: Citizenship in Times of Classic Peronism (1946-1955) |
| title_full |
Parliamentary Debate over National Territories’ Provincialization: Citizenship in Times of Classic Peronism (1946-1955) |
| title_fullStr |
Parliamentary Debate over National Territories’ Provincialization: Citizenship in Times of Classic Peronism (1946-1955) |
| title_full_unstemmed |
Parliamentary Debate over National Territories’ Provincialization: Citizenship in Times of Classic Peronism (1946-1955) |
| title_sort |
parliamentary debate over national territories’ provincialization: citizenship in times of classic peronism (1946-1955) |
| description |
Abstract:In the following article we analyze the interparty discussion that took place in the Chamber of National Deputies following provincialization projects of national territories presented by Peronism between 1951 and 1955. The Peronism proposed gradually turn the national territories into provinces, transforming La Pampa and Chaco in 1951, then Misiones in 1953 and in 1955 Formosa, Río Negro, Neuquén, and a new province formed by Santa Cruz, Tierra del Fuego, the Antarctic portion and South Atlantic Islands. Instead, the opposition, led by Radicalism, postulated an extensive provincialization to all territories simul-taneously. We argue that one of the causes of this differentiation was in the differing conceptions of citizenship that held these supporters groups: while the Peronism advocated a citizenship based on the social as a starting point for obtaining political rights, radicalism advocated a defined from the political citizenship as the basis and foundation for more progress on substantive rights. |
| publisher |
Facultad de Filosofía y Humanidades. Escuela de Historia |
| publishDate |
2017 |
| url |
https://revistas.unc.edu.ar/index.php/anuariohistoria/article/view/14294 |
| work_keys_str_mv |
AT rodasmatiaseduardo parliamentarydebateovernationalterritoriesprovincializationcitizenshipintimesofclassicperonism19461955 AT rodasmatiaseduardo debatesentornoalaprovincializaciondelosterritoriosnacionaleslaciudadaniaentiemposdelperonismoclasico19461955 |
| first_indexed |
2022-08-20T01:16:28Z |
| last_indexed |
2022-08-20T01:16:28Z |
| _version_ |
1770718211165126656 |