Volatile exposure within the honeybee hive and its effect on olfactory discrimination

Honeybees of different ages and reproductive castes cohabit in the hive where they are exposed to many odors that might affect associative learning. Our aim was to analyze the role of odors pre-exposed as volatiles on appetitive learning in honeybees of different ages and search for their long-term...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autor principal: Fernández, V.M
Otros Autores: Arenas, A., Farina, W.M
Formato: Capítulo de libro
Lenguaje:Inglés
Publicado: 2009
Acceso en línea:Registro en Scopus
DOI
Handle
Registro en la Biblioteca Digital
Aporte de:Registro referencial: Solicitar el recurso aquí
LEADER 11856caa a22012017a 4500
001 PAPER-8723
003 AR-BaUEN
005 20230518203832.0
008 190411s2009 xx ||||fo|||| 00| 0 eng|d
024 7 |2 scopus  |a 2-s2.0-69449100870 
040 |a Scopus  |b spa  |c AR-BaUEN  |d AR-BaUEN 
030 |a JCPAD 
100 1 |a Fernández, V.M. 
245 1 0 |a Volatile exposure within the honeybee hive and its effect on olfactory discrimination 
260 |c 2009 
270 1 0 |m Farina, W. M.; Grupo de Estudio de Insectos Sociales, IFIBYNE-CONICET, Departamento de Biodiversidad y Biología Experimental, Universidad de Buenos Aires, Pabellón II, Ciudad Universitaria, C1428EHA Buenos Aires, Argentina; email: walter@fbmc.fcen.uba.ar 
506 |2 openaire  |e Política editorial 
504 |a Abramson, C.I., Bitterman, M.E., Latent inhibition in honeybees (1986) Anim Learn Behav, 14, pp. 184-189 
504 |a Ackil, J.E., Mellgren, R.L., Stimulus preexposure and instrumental learning (1968) Psychon Sci, 11, p. 339 
504 |a Ackil, J.E., Mellgren, R.L., Halgren, C., Frommer, G.P., Effects of CS preexposure on avoidance learning in rats with hippocampal lesions (1969) J Comp Physiol Psychol, 69, pp. 739-747 
504 |a Arenas, A., Farina, W.M., Age and rearing environment interact in the retention of early olfactory memories in honeybees (2008) J Comp Physiol A, 194, pp. 629-640 
504 |a Arenas, A., Fernandez, V.M., Farina, W.M., Floral scents experienced within the colony affect long-term foraging preferences in honeybees (2008) Apidologie, 39, pp. 714-722 
504 |a Bitterman, M.E., Menzel, R., Fietz, A., Schaefer, S., Classical conditioning of proboscis extension in honeybees (1983) J Comp Physiol A, 97, pp. 107-119 
504 |a Blodgett, H.C., The effect of the introduction of reward upon the maze performance of rats (1929) Univ Calif Publ Psychol, 4, pp. 113-134 
504 |a Bouton, M.E., Moody, E.W., Memory processes in classical conditioning. (Special issue: Neurobiology of cognition in laboratory animals: Nhallenges and opportunities) (2004) Neurosci Biobehav Rev, 28, pp. 663-674 
504 |a Breed, M.D., Perry, S., Bjostad, L.B., Testing the blank slate hypothesis: Why honeybee colonies accept young bees (2004) Insectes Soc, 51, p. 1216 
504 |a Carlton, P.L., Vogel, J.R., Habituation and conditioning (1967) J Comp Physiol Psychol, 63, pp. 348-351 
504 |a Chandra, S.B.C., Hosler, J.S., Smith, B.H., Heritable variation for latent inhibition and its correlation to reversal learning in the honeybee, Apis mellifera (2000) J Comp Psychol, 114, pp. 86-97 
504 |a Daly, K.C., Durtschi, M.L., Smith, B.H., Olfactory-based discrimination in the moth, Manduca sexta (2001) J Insect Physiol, 47, pp. 375-384 
504 |a Farina, W.M., Grüter, C., Díaz, P.C., Social learning of floral odours inside the honeybee hive (2005) Proc R Soc Lond B Biol Sci, 272, pp. 1923-1928 
504 |a Farina, W.M., Grüter, C., Acosta, L.E., McCabe, S., Honeybees learn floral odors while receiving nectar from foragers within the hive (2007) Naturwissenschaften, 94, pp. 55-60 
504 |a Ferguson, H.J., Cobey, S., Smith, B.H., Sensitivity to a change in reward is heritable in the honeybee, Apis mellifera (2001) Anim Behav, 61, pp. 527-534 
504 |a Franks, N.R., Hooper, J.W., Dornhaus, A., Aukett, P.J., Hayward, A.L., Berghoff, S., Reconnaissance and latent learning in ants (2007) Proc R Soc B, 274, pp. 1505-1509 
504 |a Gerber, B., Geberzahn, N., Hellstern, F., Klein, J., Kowalksy, O., Wüstenberg, D., Menzel, R., Honeybees transfer olfactory memories established during flower visits to a proboscis extension paradigm in the laboratory (1996) Anim Behav, 52, pp. 1079-1085 
504 |a Getz, W.M., Smith, K.B., Olfactory perception in honeybees: Concatenated and mixed odorant stimuli, concentration, and exposure effects (1991) J Comp Physiol A, 169, pp. 215-230 
504 |a Goyret, J., Farina, W.M., Non-random nectar unloading interactions between foragers and their receivers in the honeybee hive (2005) Naturwissenschaften, 92, pp. 440-443 
504 |a Grüter C, Farina WM (in press) Social experiences affect interaction patterns amongst foragers and hive mates in honeybees. Ethology; James, J.P., Latent inhibition and the preconditioning interval (1971) Psychon Sci, 24, pp. 97-98 
504 |a Knudsen, J.T., Tollsten, L., Bergstrom, L.G., Floral scents-a checklist of volatile compounds isolated by headspace techniques (1993) Phytochemistry, 33, pp. 253-280 
504 |a Konorski, J., Szwejkowska, G., Chronic extinction and restoration of conditioned reflexes. IV. The dependence of the course of extinction and restoration of conditioned reflexes on the history of the conditioned stimulus (the principle of primacy of first training) (1952) Acta Biol Exp, 16, pp. 95-113 
504 |a Laloi, D., Pham-Delègue, M.H., Bumble bees show asymmetrical discrimination between two odors in a classical conditioning procedure (2004) J Insect Behav, 17 (3), pp. 385-396 
504 |a Lubow, R.E., Latent inhibition: Effects of frequency of non-reinforced preexposure to the CS (1965) J Comp Physiol Psychol, 60, pp. 454-455 
504 |a Lubow, R.E., Latent inhibition (1973) Psychol Bull, 79 (6), pp. 398-407 
504 |a Lubow, K.E., Moore, A.U., Latent inhibition: The effect of nonreinforced pre-exposure to the conditional stimulus (1959) J Comp Physiol Psychol, 52, pp. 416-419 
504 |a Lubow, R.E., Siebert, L., Latent inhibition within the CER paradigm (1969) J Comp Physiol Psychol, 68, pp. 136-138 
504 |a Lubow, R.E., Markhan, R.E., Allen, J., Latent inhibition and classical conditioning of the rabbit pinna response (1968) J Comp Physiol Psychol, 60, pp. 454-455 
504 |a Lunney, G.H., Using analysis of variance with a dichotomous dependent variable: An empirical study (1970) J Educ Meas, 7, pp. 263-269 
504 |a Mackintosh, N.J., A theory of attention: Variations in the associability of stimuli with reinforcement (1975) Psychol Rev, 82, pp. 276-298 
504 |a Michener, C.D., (1974) The Social Behavior of Bees: A Comparative Study, , Cambridge: Harvard University Press 
504 |a Reiss, S., Wagner, A.R., CS habituation produces a "latent inhibition effect" but no active "conditioned inhibition" (1972) Learn Motiv, 3, pp. 237-245 
504 |a Sandoz, J.C., Laloi, D., Odoux, J.F., Pham-Delègue, M.H., Olfactory information transfer in the honeybee: Compared efficiency of classical conditioning and early exposure (2000) Anim Behav, 59, pp. 1025-1034 
504 |a Seeley, T.D., (1995) The Wisdom of the Hive: The Social Physiology of Honeybee Colonies, , Cambridge: Harvard University Press 
504 |a Siegel, S., Retention of latent inhibition (1970) Psychon Sci, 20, pp. 161-162 
504 |a Sokal, R.R., Rohlf, F.J., (2000) Biometry: The Principles and Practice of Statistics in Biological Research, , New York: State University of New York 
504 |a Suboski, M.D., Di Lollo, V., Gormezano, I., Effects of unpaired preacquisition exposure of CS and UCS on classical conditioning of the nictitating membrane response of the albino rabbit (1964) Psychol Rep, 15, pp. 571-576 
504 |a Takeda, K., Classical conditioned response in the honeybee (1961) J Insect Physiol, 6, pp. 168-179 
504 |a Tolman, E.C., Honzik, C.H., Introduction and removal of reward, and maze performance in rats (1930) U Cal Pub Psych, 4, pp. 257-275 
504 |a Wilson, E.O., (1971) The insect societies, , Cambridge: Harvard University Press 
520 3 |a Honeybees of different ages and reproductive castes cohabit in the hive where they are exposed to many odors that might affect associative learning. Our aim was to analyze the role of odors pre-exposed as volatiles on appetitive learning in honeybees of different ages and search for their long-term effect both under natural and laboratory conditions. By evaluating memory acquisition and retention through a differential proboscis extension response conditioning, we found that hive-exposed odors offered as a reinforced conditioned stimulus during training promoted a learning-reduced effect [latent inhibition (LI)]. On the other hand, no effect was found when the non-reinforced conditioned stimulus was pre-exposed. The LI effect varied with the odor identity. However, only slight differences were found with the age of the bees. Exposure-conditioning intervals longer than 24 h did not show an LI effect unless the odor concentration was increased or exposure was prolonged. Our results show that pre-exposed volatiles could either reduce learning performance, if this odor is later associated with food, or be irrelevant in the case that alternative scented resources circulate within the colony. The differential effects found according to the olfactory exposure characteristics could strongly influence the propagation of chemosensory information within the hive. © Springer-Verlag 2009.  |l eng 
536 |a Detalles de la financiación: Universidad de Buenos Aires, X 077 
536 |a Detalles de la financiación: Agencia Nacional de Promoción Científica y Tecnológica 
536 |a Detalles de la financiación: Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas 
536 |a Detalles de la financiación: Acknowledgments We thank the two anonymous referees for their valuable comments and suggestions that improved the Wnal version of this manuscript. This study was supported by grants from ANPCYT (01-1155), University of Buenos Aires (X 077) and CONICET to WMF. We declare that our experiments comply with the current laws of the country in which they were performed. 
593 |a Grupo de Estudio de Insectos Sociales, IFIBYNE-CONICET, Departamento de Biodiversidad y Biología Experimental, Universidad de Buenos Aires, Pabellón II, Ciudad Universitaria, C1428EHA Buenos Aires, Argentina 
690 1 0 |a ASSOCIATIVE LEARNING 
690 1 0 |a DIFFERENTIAL CONDITIONING 
690 1 0 |a LATENT INHIBITION 
690 1 0 |a ODOR PRE-EXPOSURE 
690 1 0 |a AGE 
690 1 0 |a ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE 
690 1 0 |a ANIMAL 
690 1 0 |a ARTICLE 
690 1 0 |a BEE 
690 1 0 |a CONDITIONED REFLEX 
690 1 0 |a LEARNING 
690 1 0 |a MEMORY 
690 1 0 |a ODOR 
690 1 0 |a OLFACTORY SYSTEM 
690 1 0 |a PERCEPTIVE DISCRIMINATION 
690 1 0 |a PHYSIOLOGY 
690 1 0 |a TIME 
690 1 0 |a AGE FACTORS 
690 1 0 |a ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE 
690 1 0 |a ANIMALS 
690 1 0 |a ASSOCIATION LEARNING 
690 1 0 |a BEES 
690 1 0 |a CONDITIONING, CLASSICAL 
690 1 0 |a DISCRIMINATION (PSYCHOLOGY) 
690 1 0 |a MEMORY 
690 1 0 |a ODORS 
690 1 0 |a OLFACTORY PATHWAYS 
690 1 0 |a SMELL 
690 1 0 |a TIME FACTORS 
700 1 |a Arenas, A. 
700 1 |a Farina, W.M. 
773 0 |d 2009  |g v. 195  |h pp. 759-768  |k n. 8  |p J. Comp. Physiol. A Neuroethol. Sens. Neural. Behav. Physiol.  |x 03407594  |w (AR-BaUEN)CENRE-233  |t Journal of Comparative Physiology A: Neuroethology, Sensory, Neural, and Behavioral Physiology 
856 4 1 |u https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-69449100870&doi=10.1007%2fs00359-009-0453-4&partnerID=40&md5=5038f5cb32d20127175861e7373b609e  |y Registro en Scopus 
856 4 0 |u https://doi.org/10.1007/s00359-009-0453-4  |y DOI 
856 4 0 |u https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12110/paper_03407594_v195_n8_p759_Fernandez  |y Handle 
856 4 0 |u https://bibliotecadigital.exactas.uba.ar/collection/paper/document/paper_03407594_v195_n8_p759_Fernandez  |y Registro en la Biblioteca Digital 
961 |a paper_03407594_v195_n8_p759_Fernandez  |b paper  |c PE 
962 |a info:eu-repo/semantics/article  |a info:ar-repo/semantics/artículo  |b info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion 
963 |a VARI 
999 |c 69676