Scanning pattern of greater rheas, Rhea americana: Collective vigilance would increase the probability of detecting a predator
Many models using vigilance to predict the probability of detecting an approaching predator assumes that prey scanning events should be produced at random. Consequently, the length of intervals among successive scans must follow a negative exponential distribution. We analyzed the scanning behavior...
Guardado en:
| Autor principal: | |
|---|---|
| Otros Autores: | |
| Formato: | Capítulo de libro |
| Lenguaje: | Inglés |
| Publicado: |
2009
|
| Materias: | |
| Acceso en línea: | Registro en Scopus DOI Handle Registro en la Biblioteca Digital |
| Aporte de: | Registro referencial: Solicitar el recurso aquí |
| LEADER | 10667caa a22009617a 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | PAPER-8680 | ||
| 003 | AR-BaUEN | ||
| 005 | 20230518203829.0 | ||
| 008 | 190411s2009 xx ||||fo|||| 00| 0 eng|d | ||
| 024 | 7 | |2 scopus |a 2-s2.0-70349500546 | |
| 040 | |a Scopus |b spa |c AR-BaUEN |d AR-BaUEN | ||
| 030 | |a JOETE | ||
| 100 | 1 | |a Carro, M.E. | |
| 245 | 1 | 0 | |a Scanning pattern of greater rheas, Rhea americana: Collective vigilance would increase the probability of detecting a predator |
| 260 | |c 2009 | ||
| 270 | 1 | 0 | |m Carro, M. E.; Laboratorio de Ecología y Comportamiento Animal, Departamento de Ecología, Genética y Evolución, Facultad de Ciencias Exactas y Naturales, Universidad de Buenos Aires, Int Guiraldes s/n, Pabellón II,Ciudad Universitaria, C1428EHA Buenos Aires, Argentina; email: camariana@gmail.com |
| 506 | |2 openaire |e Política editorial | ||
| 504 | |a Beauchamp, G., Nonrandom patterns of vigilance in flocks of the greater flamingo, Phoenicopterus rubber rubber (2006) Anim Behav, 71, pp. 593-598 | ||
| 504 | |a Bednekoff, P.A., Lima, S.L., Randomness, chaos and confusion in the study of antidepredator vigilante (1998) TREE, 13, pp. 284-287 | ||
| 504 | |a Bednekoff, P.A., Lima, S.L., Why are scanning patterns so variable? An overlooked question in the study of anti-predator vigilance (2002) J Avian Biol, 33, pp. 143-149 | ||
| 504 | |a Bertram, B.C.R., Vigilance and group size in ostriches (1980) Anim Behav, 28, pp. 278-286 | ||
| 504 | |a Boland, C.R.J., An experimental test of predator detection rates using groups of free-living emus (2003) Ethology, 109, pp. 209-222 | ||
| 504 | |a Bruning, D.F., Social structure and reproductive behavior of the greater rhea (1974) Living Bird, 13, pp. 251-294 | ||
| 504 | |a Caraco, T., Time budgeting and group size: A test of theory (1979) Ecology, 60, pp. 618-627 | ||
| 504 | |a Caraco, T., Martindale, S., Pulliam, H.R., Avian flocking in the presence of a predator (1980) Nature, 285, pp. 400-401 | ||
| 504 | |a Caro, T., (2005) Antipredator Defenses in Birds and Mammals, , Chicago: The University of Chicago Press | ||
| 504 | |a Carro, M.E., Fernández, G.J., Seasonal variation in social organisation and diurnal activity budget of the Greater Rhea (Rhea americana) in the Argentinean pampas (2008) Emu, 108, pp. 167-173 | ||
| 504 | |a Cresswell, W., Flocking is an effective anti-predator strategy in redshanks, Tringa tetanus (1994) Anim Behav, 47, pp. 433-442 | ||
| 504 | |a Cresswell, W., Quinn, J.L., Whittingham, M.J., Butler, S., Good foragers can also be good at detecting predators (2003) Proc R Soc B, 270, pp. 1069-1076 | ||
| 504 | |a Dehn, M.M., Vigilance for predators: Detection and dilution effects (1990) Behav Ecol Sociobiol, 26, pp. 337-342 | ||
| 504 | |a Ebensperger, L.A., Hurtado, M.J., Ramos-Jiliberto, R., Vigilance and collective detection of predators in Degus (Octodon degus) (2006) Ethology, 112, pp. 879-887 | ||
| 504 | |a Elcavage, P., Caraco, T., Vigilante behavior in house sparrow flocks (1983) Anim Behav, 31, pp. 303-304 | ||
| 504 | |a Elgar, M.A., Predator vigilance and group size in mammals and birds: A critical review of the empirical evidence (1989) Biol Rev, 64, pp. 13-33 | ||
| 504 | |a Elgar, M.A., Catterall, C.P., Flocking and predator surveillance in house sparrows (1981) Anim Behav, 29, pp. 868-872 | ||
| 504 | |a Fernández, G.J., Capurro, A.F., Reboreda, J.C., Effect of group size on individual and collective vigilance in Greater Rheas (2003) Ethology, 109, pp. 413-425 | ||
| 504 | |a Fernández-Juricic, E., Erichsen, J.T., Kacelnik, A., Visual perception and social foraging in birds (2004) TREE, 19, pp. 25-31 | ||
| 504 | |a Hart, A., Lendrem, D.W., Vigilance and scanning patterns in birds (1984) Anim Behav, 32, pp. 1216-1224 | ||
| 504 | |a Hudson, W.H., (1920) Birds of La Plata, , London: JM Dent and Sons | ||
| 504 | |a Jarman, P.J., Group size and activity in eastern grey kangaroos (1987) Anim Behav, 35, pp. 1044-1050 | ||
| 504 | |a Kramer, M., Bell, W.R., Comments on predictability and over differencing in vigilante sequences (1996) Anim Behav, 51, pp. 1175-1178 | ||
| 504 | |a Lehner, P.N., (1998) Handbook of Ethological Methods, , 2nd edn, Cambridge U.K: Cambridge University Press | ||
| 504 | |a Lendrem, D.W., Predation risk and vigilance in the blue tit (Parus caerulescens) (1983) Behav Ecol Sociobiol, 13, pp. 9-13 | ||
| 504 | |a Lendrem, D.W., Flocking, feeding and predation risk: Absolute and instantaneous feeding rates (1984) Anim Behav, 32, pp. 298-299 | ||
| 504 | |a Lendrem, D.W., Stretch, D., Metcalfe, N.B., Jones, P., Scanning for predators in the purple sandpiper: A time-dependent or time-independent process? (1986) Anim Behav, 34, pp. 1577-1578 | ||
| 504 | |a Lima, S.L., Distance to cover, visual obstructions, and vigilance in house sparrows (1987) Behaviour, 102, pp. 231-238 | ||
| 504 | |a Lima, S.L., Collective detection of predatory attack by social foragers: Fraught with ambiguity (1995) Anim Behav, 50, pp. 1097-1108 | ||
| 504 | |a Lima, S.L., Bednekoff, P.A., Back to the basics of antipredatory vigilance: Can nonvigilant animals detect attack? (1999) Anim Behav, 58, pp. 537-543 | ||
| 504 | |a Lima, S.L., Dill, L.M., Behavioural decisions made under the risk of predation: A review and prospectus (1990) Can J Zool, 68, pp. 619-640 | ||
| 504 | |a Lind, J., Cresswell, W., Determining the fitness consequences of antipredator behavior (2005) Behav Ecol, 16, pp. 945-956 | ||
| 504 | |a Martella, M.B., Renison, D., Navarro, J.L., Vigilance in the greater rhea: Effects of vegetation height and group size (1995) J Field Ornithol, 66, pp. 215-220 | ||
| 504 | |a Matis, J.H., Rubink, W.L., Makela, M., Use of the gamma distribution for predicting arrival times of invading insect populations (1992) Environ Entomol, 21, pp. 436-440 | ||
| 504 | |a Mermoz, O.L., García, R.M., (2006) Distribuciones univariantes de probabilidad, , Buenos Aires: Nueva Librería | ||
| 504 | |a Pulliam, H.R., On the advantages of flocking (1973) J Theor Biol, 38, pp. 419-422 | ||
| 504 | |a Pulliam, H.R., Caraco, T., Living in groups: Is there an optimal group size? (1984) Behavioural Ecology, pp. 127-147. , 2nd edn, J. R. Krebs and N. B. Davies (Eds.), Oxford: Blackwell Scientific | ||
| 504 | |a Reboreda, J.C., Fernández, G.J., Sexual, seasonal and group size differences in the allocation of time between vigilance and feeding in the Greater Rhea, Rhea americana (1997) Ethology, 103, pp. 198-207 | ||
| 504 | |a Roberts, G., When to scan: An analysis of predictability in vigilance sequences using autoregression models (1994) Anim Behav, 38, pp. 771-777 | ||
| 504 | |a Scannell, J., Roberts, G., Lazarus, J., Prey scan at random to evade observant predators (2001) Proc R Soc Lond B, 268, pp. 541-547 | ||
| 504 | |a Sullivan, K.A., Vigilance patterns in Downy woodpeckers (1985) Anim Behav, 33, pp. 328-330 | ||
| 504 | |a Treherne, J.E., Foster, W.A., Group transmission of predator avoidance behaviour in a marine insect: The Trafalgar effect (1981) Anim Behav, 29, pp. 911-917 | ||
| 504 | |a Treves A (2000) Theory and method in studies of vigilance and aggregation. Anim Behav 60:711-722 | ||
| 520 | 3 | |a Many models using vigilance to predict the probability of detecting an approaching predator assumes that prey scanning events should be produced at random. Consequently, the length of intervals among successive scans must follow a negative exponential distribution. We analyzed the scanning behavior of the greater rhea, Rhea americana, which is a gregarious, flightless bird, in eastern Argentina. We investigated whether individual and/or collective scanning departed from random and whether this departure varied with group size. We used two simulation models based on observed scanning sequences to assess the effectiveness of vigilance on the individual and collective level when faced with an opportunistic or stalking predator. The analysis of 59 behavioral sequences of wild greater rheas foraging solitary or in groups of two to six or more individuals revealed that the inter-scan length of individual sequences significantly departed from random. In contrast, inter-scan intervals for collective vigilance were shorter than individual ones, but only fit the random expectation for groups of two and five individuals. Models showed that collective vigilance could increase the probability of detecting a predator, thereby reducing their vulnerability, independent of whether the predator uses a stalking or opportunistic approaching strategy. © Japan Ethological Society and Springer 2008. |l eng | |
| 536 | |a Detalles de la financiación: Universidad de Buenos Aires | ||
| 536 | |a Detalles de la financiación: Acknowledgments We thank V. Simoy and F. Milano for logistical support and field assistance at Ayacucho. M. Beade and M. Mermoz provided GJF with field assistance at General Lavalle. We thank J. Boote, R. Paso and A. Guzman for allowing us to perform the study on their cattle ranches. We also thank C. Battagliese for checking the English grammar and M. Mermoz and two anonymous reviewers for their comments on an earlier version of this MS. This study was supported by a grant of University of Buenos Aires to GJF (Programación UBACYT 2004–2007 X007). | ||
| 593 | |a Laboratorio de Ecología y Comportamiento Animal, Departamento de Ecología, Genética y Evolución, Facultad de Ciencias Exactas y Naturales, Universidad de Buenos Aires, Int Guiraldes s/n, Pabellón II,Ciudad Universitaria, C1428EHA Buenos Aires, Argentina | ||
| 690 | 1 | 0 | |a COLLECTIVE VIGILANCE |
| 690 | 1 | 0 | |a GROUP SIZE |
| 690 | 1 | 0 | |a INDIVIDUAL VIGILANCE |
| 690 | 1 | 0 | |a INSTANTANEOUS RANDOMNESS |
| 690 | 1 | 0 | |a PREDATION RISK |
| 690 | 1 | 0 | |a PALAEOGNATHAE |
| 690 | 1 | 0 | |a RHEA |
| 651 | 4 | |a RHEA AMERICANA | |
| 651 | 4 | |a RHEA AMERICANA | |
| 650 | 1 | 7 | |2 spines |a AVES |
| 700 | 1 | |a Fernández, G.J. | |
| 773 | 0 | |d 2009 |g v. 27 |h pp. 429-436 |k n. 3 |p J. Ethol. |x 02890771 |t Journal of Ethology | |
| 856 | 4 | 1 | |u https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-70349500546&doi=10.1007%2fs10164-008-0137-5&partnerID=40&md5=b33e6552953f89a537fb0326654a7755 |y Registro en Scopus |
| 856 | 4 | 0 | |u https://doi.org/10.1007/s10164-008-0137-5 |y DOI |
| 856 | 4 | 0 | |u https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12110/paper_02890771_v27_n3_p429_Carro |y Handle |
| 856 | 4 | 0 | |u https://bibliotecadigital.exactas.uba.ar/collection/paper/document/paper_02890771_v27_n3_p429_Carro |y Registro en la Biblioteca Digital |
| 961 | |a paper_02890771_v27_n3_p429_Carro |b paper |c PE | ||
| 962 | |a info:eu-repo/semantics/article |a info:ar-repo/semantics/artículo |b info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion | ||
| 999 | |c 69633 | ||