Partial behaviour modelling: Foundations for incremental and iterative model-based software engineering
Rigorous modelling of the intended behaviour of software intensive systems has been shown to be successfull in uncovering requirements and design flaws. However, the impact that behaviour modelling has had among practitioners is limited. The construction of behaviour models remains a difficult and l...
Guardado en:
| Autor principal: | |
|---|---|
| Formato: | Acta de conferencia Capítulo de libro |
| Lenguaje: | Inglés |
| Publicado: |
2009
|
| Acceso en línea: | Registro en Scopus DOI Handle Registro en la Biblioteca Digital |
| Aporte de: | Registro referencial: Solicitar el recurso aquí |
| LEADER | 09026caa a22007577a 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | PAPER-8225 | ||
| 003 | AR-BaUEN | ||
| 005 | 20230518203802.0 | ||
| 008 | 190411s2009 xx ||||fo|||| 00| 0 eng|d | ||
| 024 | 7 | |2 scopus |a 2-s2.0-70649103754 | |
| 040 | |a Scopus |b spa |c AR-BaUEN |d AR-BaUEN | ||
| 100 | 1 | |a Uchitel, S. | |
| 245 | 1 | 0 | |a Partial behaviour modelling: Foundations for incremental and iterative model-based software engineering |
| 260 | |c 2009 | ||
| 270 | 1 | 0 | |m Uchitel, S.; Department of Computing, Imperial College London, 180 Queen's Gate, London SW7 2RH, United Kingdom; email: suchitel@dc.uba.ar |
| 506 | |2 openaire |e Política editorial | ||
| 504 | |a Antonik, A., Huth, M., Larsen, K., Nyman, U., Wasowski, A.: EXPTIME-complete Decision Problems for Mixed and Modal Specifications. In: 15th International Workshop on Expressiveness in Concurrency (August 2008); Antonik, A., Huth, M., Larsen, K.G., Nyman, U., Wasowski, A., Complexity of decision problems for mixed and modal specifications (2008) LNCS, 4962, pp. 112-126. , Amadio, R.M, ed, FOS-SACS 2008, Springer, Heidelberg | ||
| 504 | |a Bontemps, Y., Heymans, P., Schobbens, P.-Y., From live sequence charts to state machines and back: A guided tour (2005) IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering, 31 (12), pp. 999-1014 | ||
| 504 | |a Brunet, G., Chechik, M., Uchitel, S.: Properties of behavioural model merging. In: Misra, J., Nipkow, T., Sekerinski, E. (eds.) FM 2006. LNCS, 4085, pp. 98-114. Springer, Heidelberg (2006); D'Ippolito, N., Fischbein, D., Chechik, M., Uchitel, S., Mtsa: The modal transition system analyser (2008) 23rd IEEE/ACM International Conference on Automated Software Engineering (ASE, pp. 475-476. , http://sourceforge.net/projects/mtsa, L'Aquila, Italy, September 15-19, pp, IEEE, Los Alamitos | ||
| 504 | |a Fantechi, A., Gnesi, S., Formal modeling for product families engineering (2008) Proceedings of Software Product Lines, 12th International Conference, SPLC, pp. 193-202. , Limerick, Ireland, September 8-12, pp, IEEE Computer Society, Los Alamitos | ||
| 504 | |a Fischbein, D., Braberman, V., Uchitel, S.: A sound observational semantics for modal transition systems. In: Leucker, M., Morgan, C. (eds.) ICTAC 2009. LNCS, 5684, pp. 215-230. Springer, Heidelberg (2009); Fischbein, D., Uchitel, S., On correct and complete strong merging of partial behaviour models (2008) Proceedings of the 16th ACM SIGSOFT International Symposium on Foundations of Software Engineering, pp. 297-307. , Harrold, M.J, Murphy, G.C, eds, Atlanta, Georgia, USA, November 9-14, pp, ACM, New York | ||
| 504 | |a Fischbein, D., Uchitel, S., Braberman, V.A.: A foundation for behavioural conformance in software product line architectures. In: Hierons, R.M., Muccini, H. (eds.) ROSATEA, pp. 39-48. ACM, New York (2006); Harel, D., Marelly, R., (2003) Come, Let's Play: Scenario-Based Programming Using LSCs and the Play-Engine, , Springer, Heidelberg | ||
| 504 | |a Huth, M., Refinement is complete for implementations (2005) Formal Aspects of Computing, 17 (2), pp. 113-137 | ||
| 504 | |a Hüttel, H., Larsen, K.G., The use of static constructs in a modal process logic (1989) LNCS, 363, pp. 163-180. , Meyer, A.R, Taitslin, M.A, eds, Logic at Botik 1989, Springer, Heidelberg | ||
| 504 | |a Recommendation z, I.T.U., (2000) 120: Message sequence charts, , ITU | ||
| 504 | |a Keller, R.M., (1976) Formal verification of parallel programs. Commun, , ACM | ||
| 504 | |a Krka, I., Brun, Y., Edwards, G., Medvidovic, N.: Synthesizing partial component-level behavior models from system specifications. In: van Vliet, H., Issarny, V. (eds.) ESEC/SIGSOFT FSE, pp. 305-314. ACM, New York (2009); Larsen, K.G., Steffen, B., Weise, C., A constraint oriented proof methodology based on modal transition systems (1995) LNCS, 1019. , Brinksma, E, Steffen, B, Cleaveland, W.R, Larsen, K.G, Margaria, T, eds, TACAS 1995, Springer, Heidelberg | ||
| 504 | |a Larsen, K.G., Thomsen, B., A modal process logic (1988) Proceedings, Third Annual Symposium on Logic in Computer Science, , Edinburgh, Scotland, UK, July 5-8. IEEE Computer Society, Los Alamitos | ||
| 504 | |a Larsen, K.G., Xinxin, L., Equation solving using modal transition systems (1990) Proceedings, Fifth Annual IEEE Symposium on Logic in Computer Science, pp. 108-117. , Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA, June 4-7, pp, IEEE Computer Society, Los Alamitos | ||
| 504 | |a Letier, E., Kramer, J., Magee, J., Uchitel, S., Deriving event-based transition systems from goal-oriented requirements models (2008) Automated Software Engineering Journal, 15 (2), pp. 175-206 | ||
| 504 | |a Milner, R., (1989) Communication and Concurrency, , Prentice-Hall, New York | ||
| 504 | |a Sibay, G., Uchitel, S., Braberman, V.A., Existential live sequence charts revisited (2008) 30th International Conference on Software Engineering (ICSE, pp. 41-50. , Schäfer, W, Dwyer, M.B, Gruhn, V, eds, Leipzig, Germany, May 10-18, pp, ACM, New York | ||
| 504 | |a Uchitel, S., Brunet, G., Chechik, M., Synthesis of partial behavior models from properties and scenarios (2009) IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering, 35 (3), pp. 384-406 | ||
| 504 | |a Uchitel, S., Chechik, M., Merging partial behavioural models (2004) Proceedings of the 12th ACM SIGSOFT International Symposium on Foundations of Software Engineering, pp. 43-52. , Taylor, R.N, Dwyer, M.B, eds, Newport Beach, CA, USA, October 31, November 6, pp, ACM, New York | ||
| 504 | |a Uchitel, S., Kramer, J., Magee, J., Incremental Elaboration of Scenario-Based Specifications and Behaviour Models using Implied Scenarios (2004) ACM TOSEM, 13 (1) | ||
| 504 | |a van Gabbeek, R.J., Weijland, W.P., Branching time and abstraction in bisimulation semantics (1996) J. ACM, 43 (3), pp. 555-600 | ||
| 520 | 3 | |a Rigorous modelling of the intended behaviour of software intensive systems has been shown to be successfull in uncovering requirements and design flaws. However, the impact that behaviour modelling has had among practitioners is limited. The construction of behaviour models remains a difficult and laborious task that requires significant expertise. In addition, traditional approaches to behaviour models require complete descriptions of the system behaviour up to some level of abstraction. This completeness assumption is limiting in the context of software development process best practices which include iterative development, adoption of use-case and scenario-based techniques and viewpoint- or stakeholder-based analysis; practices which require modelling and analysis in the presence of partial information about system behaviour. Our aim is to support the iterative and incremental construction of behaviour models by means of construction, composition and analysis of partial, heterogeneous, yet formal, descriptions of behaviour. In this talk we discuss how modal transitions systems can provide the basis for such support and present some of the model synthesis and composition techniques we have developed. © 2009 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg. |l eng | |
| 593 | |a Department of Computing, Imperial College London, 180 Queen's Gate, London SW7 2RH, United Kingdom | ||
| 593 | |a Department of Computer Science, FCEN, Universidad de Buenos Aires, Intendente Güiraldes 2160, C1428EGA, Argentina | ||
| 690 | 1 | 0 | |a BEHAVIOUR MODELLING |
| 690 | 1 | 0 | |a BEHAVIOUR MODELS |
| 690 | 1 | 0 | |a BEST PRACTICE |
| 690 | 1 | 0 | |a COMPOSITION TECHNIQUE |
| 690 | 1 | 0 | |a DESIGN FLAWS |
| 690 | 1 | 0 | |a INCREMENTAL CONSTRUCTION |
| 690 | 1 | 0 | |a ITERATIVE DEVELOPMENT |
| 690 | 1 | 0 | |a ITERATIVE MODEL |
| 690 | 1 | 0 | |a LEVEL OF ABSTRACTION |
| 690 | 1 | 0 | |a MODAL TRANSITION |
| 690 | 1 | 0 | |a MODEL SYNTHESIS |
| 690 | 1 | 0 | |a PARTIAL INFORMATION |
| 690 | 1 | 0 | |a SOFTWARE DEVELOPMENT PROCESS |
| 690 | 1 | 0 | |a SOFTWARE INTENSIVE SYSTEMS |
| 690 | 1 | 0 | |a COMPUTER SOFTWARE |
| 690 | 1 | 0 | |a FORMAL METHODS |
| 690 | 1 | 0 | |a MATHEMATICAL MODELS |
| 711 | 2 | |c Gramado |d 19 August 2009 through 21 August 2009 |g Código de la conferencia: 78806 | |
| 773 | 0 | |d 2009 |g v. 5902 LNCS |h pp. 17-22 |p Lect. Notes Comput. Sci. |n Lecture Notes in Computer Science (including subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics) |x 03029743 |w (AR-BaUEN)CENRE-983 |z 3642104517 |z 9783642104510 |t 12th Brazilian Symposium on Formal Methods, SBMF 2009 | |
| 856 | 4 | 1 | |u https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-70649103754&doi=10.1007%2f978-3-642-10452-7_2&partnerID=40&md5=3c8a5928bd2f6f316d6539b13ce99f87 |y Registro en Scopus |
| 856 | 4 | 0 | |u https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-10452-7_2 |y DOI |
| 856 | 4 | 0 | |u https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12110/paper_03029743_v5902LNCS_n_p17_Uchitel |y Handle |
| 856 | 4 | 0 | |u https://bibliotecadigital.exactas.uba.ar/collection/paper/document/paper_03029743_v5902LNCS_n_p17_Uchitel |y Registro en la Biblioteca Digital |
| 961 | |a paper_03029743_v5902LNCS_n_p17_Uchitel |b paper |c PE | ||
| 962 | |a info:eu-repo/semantics/article |a info:ar-repo/semantics/artículo |b info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion | ||
| 963 | |a VARI | ||
| 999 | |c 69178 | ||