Reply to “Comment on ‘Pairing interaction and Galilei invariance’ ”

We discuss the validity of the Galilei invariance in nuclei. The experimentally measured changes in the dipole energy weighted sum rule, due to their magnitude, cannot be explained only by the relative motion of protons and neutrons. Additionally we reemphasize that the usual mean field descriptions...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autor principal: Dussel, Guillermo Gaspar
Otros Autores: Sofia, H.M, Tonina, A.
Formato: Capítulo de libro
Lenguaje:Inglés
Publicado: 1999
Acceso en línea:Registro en Scopus
DOI
Handle
Registro en la Biblioteca Digital
Aporte de:Registro referencial: Solicitar el recurso aquí
LEADER 03484caa a22004097a 4500
001 PAPER-16545
003 AR-BaUEN
005 20250228092811.0
008 190411s1999 xx ||||fo|||| 00| 0 eng|d
024 7 |2 scopus  |a 2-s2.0-85035249582 
040 |a Scopus  |b spa  |c AR-BaUEN  |d AR-BaUEN 
100 1 |a Dussel, Guillermo Gaspar 
245 1 0 |a Reply to “Comment on ‘Pairing interaction and Galilei invariance’ ” 
260 |c 1999 
270 1 0 |m Dussel, G.G.; Comisión Nacional de Energía AtómicaArgentina 
504 |a Richard Feynman, The Character of Physical Law (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, 1965), especially pp. 167,168; B. D. Serot and J. D. Walecka, in Advances in Nuclear Physics, edited by J. W. Negele and E. Vogt (Plenum Press, New York, 1986), Vol. 16, especially pp. 94–97; Dufour, M., Zuker, A.P., (1996) Phys. Rev. C, 54, p. 1641 
504 |a Lepretre, A., Beil, H., Bergere, R., Carlos, P., Fagot, J., De Miniac, A., Veyssiere, A., (1981) Nucl. Phys., A367, p. 237 
504 |a Fultz, S.C., Bramblett, R.L., Berman, B.L., Caldwell, J.T., Kelly, M.A., (1967) Proceedings of the International Nuclear Physics Conference, p. 397. , Aa. Bohr and B. Mottelson, Nuclear Structure (World Scientific, Singapore, 1998), Vol. II, especially Figs. 6–20, p. 479, R. L. Becker, Academic Press, New York 
504 |a Dussel, G.G., Sofia, H.M., Tonina, A., (1997) Phys. Rev. C, 56, p. 804 
504 |a Ring, P., Schuck, P., (1980) The Nuclear Many Body Problem, , Springer-Verlag, New York 
504 |a Thouless, D.J., (1961) Nucl. Phys., 22, p. 78 
504 |a Arias, J.M., Gallardo, M., Gómez-Camacho, J., (1999) Phys. Rev. C, 59, p. 2952 
506 |2 openaire  |e Política editorial 
520 3 |a We discuss the validity of the Galilei invariance in nuclei. The experimentally measured changes in the dipole energy weighted sum rule, due to their magnitude, cannot be explained only by the relative motion of protons and neutrons. Additionally we reemphasize that the usual mean field descriptions introduce violations of the Galilei invariance. © 1999 The American Physical Society.  |l eng 
593 |a Departamento de Física Juan Jose Giambiagi, FCEyN, Universidad de Buenos Aires, Ciudad Universitaria, Pabellón 1, Buenos Aires, 1428, Argentina 
593 |a Departamento de Física, Comisión Nacional de Energía Atómica, Avenida del Libertador 8250, Buenos Aires, 1429, Argentina 
593 |a Departamento de Física Juan Jose Giambiagi, FCEyN, Universidad de Buenos Aires, Ciudad Universitaria, Pabellón 1, Buenos Aires, 1428, Argentina 
700 1 |a Sofia, H.M. 
700 1 |a Tonina, A. 
773 0 |d 1999  |g v. 59  |h pp. 2954-2955  |k n. 5  |p Phys. Rev. C Nucl. Phys.  |x 05562813  |w (AR-BaUEN)CENRE-385  |t Physical Review C - Nuclear Physics 
856 4 1 |u https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-85035249582&doi=10.1103%2fPhysRevC.59.2954&partnerID=40&md5=0a03ca70c23713c61ae3711a40f4783f  |x registro  |y Registro en Scopus 
856 4 0 |u https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevC.59.2954  |x doi  |y DOI 
856 4 0 |u https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12110/paper_05562813_v59_n5_p2954_Dussel  |x handle  |y Handle 
856 4 0 |u https://bibliotecadigital.exactas.uba.ar/collection/paper/document/paper_05562813_v59_n5_p2954_Dussel  |x registro  |y Registro en la Biblioteca Digital 
961 |a paper_05562813_v59_n5_p2954_Dussel  |b paper  |c PE 
962 |a info:eu-repo/semantics/article  |a info:ar-repo/semantics/artículo  |b info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion 
963 |a VARI