Inter and intraspecific variation in female remating propensity in the cactophilic sibling species Drosophila buzzatii and D. koepferae

Post-mating sexual selection by means of sperm competition or cryptic female choice occurs in species in which females remate before exhausting sperm supplied by previous mates. Thus, sperm competition is expected to be stronger when inseminated females remate more frequently or take longer to deple...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autor principal: Hurtado, J.
Otros Autores: Hasson, E.
Formato: Capítulo de libro
Lenguaje:Inglés
Publicado: 2013
Acceso en línea:Registro en Scopus
DOI
Handle
Registro en la Biblioteca Digital
Aporte de:Registro referencial: Solicitar el recurso aquí
LEADER 13201caa a22013337a 4500
001 PAPER-11577
003 AR-BaUEN
005 20230518204144.0
008 190411s2013 xx ||||fo|||| 00| 0 eng|d
024 7 |2 scopus  |a 2-s2.0-84876422560 
040 |a Scopus  |b spa  |c AR-BaUEN  |d AR-BaUEN 
030 |a JIPHA 
100 1 |a Hurtado, J. 
245 1 0 |a Inter and intraspecific variation in female remating propensity in the cactophilic sibling species Drosophila buzzatii and D. koepferae 
260 |c 2013 
270 1 0 |m Hurtado, J.; Departamento de Ecología, Genética y Evolución, Facultad de Ciencias Exactas y Naturales, UBA, Ciudad Universitaria, Pabellón II, C1428EGA Buenos Aires, Argentina; email: jhurtado@ege.fcen.uba.ar 
506 |2 openaire  |e Política editorial 
504 |a Aigaki, T., Fleischmann, I., Chen, P.S., Kubli, E., Ectopic expression of sex peptide alters reproductive behavior of female Drosophila melanogaster (1991) Neuron, 7, pp. 557-563 
504 |a Arnqvist, G., Comparative evidence for the evolution of genitalia by sexual selection (1998) Nature, 393, pp. 784-786 
504 |a Arnqvist, G., Rowe, L., (2005) Sexual Conflict, , Princeton University Press, Princeton, New Jersey 
504 |a Birkhead, T.R., Pizzari, T., Postcopulatory sexual selection (2002) Nature Review Genetics, 3, pp. 262-273 
504 |a Dickson, B.J., Wired for sex: the neurobiology of Drosophila mating decisions (2008) Science, 322 (5903), pp. 904-909 
504 |a Bloch Qazi, M.C., Heifetz, Y., Wolfner, M.F., The developments between gametogenesis and fertilization: ovulation and female sperm storage in Drosophila melanogaster (2003) Developmental Biology, 256, pp. 195-211 
504 |a Eberhard, W.G., (1985) Sexual Selection and Animal Genitalia, , Harvard University Press, Harvard 
504 |a Fanara, J.J., Fontdevila, A., Hasson, E., Oviposition preference and life history traits in the cactophilic sibling species Drosophila koepferae and Drosophila buzzatii in association to their natural host (1999) Evolutionary Ecology, 13, pp. 173-190 
504 |a Fanara, J.J., Hasson, E., Oviposition acceptance and fecundity schedule in the cactophilic sibling species Drosophila buzzatii and D. koepferae on their natural hosts (2001) Evolution, 55, pp. 2615-2619 
504 |a Fontdevila, A., Pla, C., Hasson, E., Wasserman, M., Sanchez, A., Naveira, H., Ruiz, A., Drosophila koepferae: a new member of the Drosophila serido (Diptera-Drosophilidae) superspecies taxon (1988) Annals of the Entomological Society of America, 81, pp. 380-385 
504 |a Fowler, G.L., Some aspects of the reproductive biology of Drosophila: sperm transfer, sperm storage, and sperm utilization (1973) Advances in Genetics, 17, pp. 293-360 
504 |a Fuyama, Y., Genetic evidence that ovulation reduces sexual receptivity in Drosophila melanogaster females (1995) Behavior Genetics, 25, pp. 581-587 
504 |a Gillot, C., Male accessory gland secretions: modulators of female reproductive physiology and behavior (2003) Annual Review of Entomology, 48, pp. 163-184 
504 |a Grima, B., Chelot, E., Xia, R., Rouyer, F., Morning and evening peaks of activity rely on different clock neurons of the Drosophila brain (2004) Nature, 431, pp. 869-873 
504 |a Gromko, M.H., Newport, M.E.A., Genetics basis for remating in Drosophila melanogaster. II. Response to selection based on the behavior of one sex (1988) Behavior Genetics, 18, pp. 621-632 
504 |a Haerty, W., Jagadeeshan, S., Kulathinal, R.J., Wong, A., Ravi Ram, K., Sirot, L.K., Levesque, L., Singh, R.S., Evolution in the fast lane: rapidly evolving sex-related genes in Drosophila (2007) Genetics, 177, pp. 1321-1335 
504 |a Hamasaka, Y., Suzuki, T., Hanai, S., Ishida, N., Evening circadian oscillator as the primary determinant of rhythmic motivation for Drosophila courtship behavior (2010) Genes to Cells, 15, pp. 1240-1248 
504 |a Hardeland, R., Species differences in the diurnal rhythmicity of courtship behavior within the melanogaster group of the genus Drosophila (1972) Animal Behaviour, 20, pp. 170-174 
504 |a Hasson, E., Soto, I.M., Carreira, V.P., Corio, C., Soto, E.M., Betti, M.I., Host plants, fitness and developmental instability in a guild of cactophilic species of the genus Drosophila (2009) Ecotoxicology Research Developments, pp. 89-109. , Nova Science Publishers, Hauppauge, E.B. Santos (Ed.) 
504 |a Klarsfeld, A., Leloup, J.C., Rouyer, F., Circadian rhythms of locomotor activity in Drosophila (2003) Behavioural Processes, 64 (2), pp. 161-175 
504 |a Kuo, T.-H., Yew, J.Y., Fedina, T.Y., Dreisewerd, K., Dierick, H.A., Pletcher, S.D., Aging modulates cuticular hydrocarbons and sexual attractiveness in Drosophila melanogaster (2012) The Journal of Experimental Biology, 215, pp. 814-821 
504 |a Lefevre, G.J., Jonsson, U.B., Sperm transfer, storage, displacement, and utilization in Drosophila melanogaster (1962) Genetics, 47, pp. 1719-1736 
504 |a Manning, A., The control of sexual receptivity in female Drosophila (1967) Animal Behaviour, 15, pp. 239-250 
504 |a Markow, T.A., A comparative investigation of the mating system of Drosophila hydei (1985) Animal Behaviour, 33, pp. 775-781 
504 |a Markow, T.A., Evolution of Drosophila mating systems (1996) Evolutionary Biology, 29, pp. 73-106 
504 |a Markow, T.A., Perspective: female remating, operational sex ratio, and the arena of sexual selection in Drosophila species (2002) Evolution, 56, pp. 1725-1734 
504 |a McRobert, S.P., Adams, C.R., Wutjke, M., Frank, J., Jackson, L.L., A comparison of female post-copulatory behaviour in Drosophila melanogaster and Drosophila biarmipes (1997) Journal of Insect Behavior, 10, pp. 761-770 
504 |a Parker, G.A., Sperm competition and its evolutionary consequences in the insects (1970) Biological Reviews, 45, pp. 525-568 
504 |a Patterson, J.T., Fate of the sperm in the productive tract of the Drosophila female in homogamic matings (1954) University of Texas Publication, 5422. , pp. 19-37 
504 |a Pinheiro, J., Bates, D., DebRoy, S., Sarkar, D., (2012) Nlme: Linear and Nonlinear Mixed Effects Models. R Package Version 3.1-104, , The R Development Core Team, R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna 
504 |a Pitnick, S., Markow, T., Spicer, G.S., Evolution of multiple kinds of female sperm-storage organs in Drosophila (1999) Evolution, 53, pp. 1804-1822 
504 |a (2012) R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing, , R Development Core Team, R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna 
504 |a Rice, W.R., Dangerous liaisons (2000) Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 97, pp. 12953-12955 
504 |a Rice, W.R., Holland, B., The enemies within: inter-genomic conflict, inter-locus contest evolution (ICE), and the intra-specific red queen (1997) Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology, 41, pp. 1-10 
504 |a Rowe, L., Arqvist, G., Sexual selection and the evolution of genital shape and complexity in water striders (2011) Evolution, pp. 40-54 
504 |a Sakai, T., Ishida, N., Circadian rhythms of female mating activity governed by clock genes in Drosophila (2001) Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 98, pp. 9221-9225 
504 |a Soto, I.M., Carreira, V.P., Fanara, J.J., Hasson, E., Evolution of male genitalia: environmental and genetic factors affect genital morphology in two Drosophila sibling species and their hybrids (2007) BMC Evolutionary Biology, 7, p. 77 
504 |a Swanson, W.J., Vacquier, V.D., Rapid evolution of reproductive proteins (2002) Nature Reviews Genetics, 3, pp. 137-144 
504 |a Tompkins, L., Genetic analysis of sex appeal in Drosophila (1984) Behavior Genetics, 14, pp. 411-440 
504 |a Tram, U., Wolfner, M.F., Seminal fluid regulation of female sexual attractiveness in Drosophila melanogaster (1998) Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 95, pp. 4051-4054 
504 |a Venables, W.N., Ripley, B.D., (2002) Modern Applied Statistics with S, , Springer, New York 
504 |a Wolfner, M.F., Tokens of love: functions and regulation of Drosophila male accessory gland products (1997) Insect Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, 27, pp. 179-192 
504 |a Wolfner, M.F., The gifts that keep on giving: physiological functions and evolutionary dynamics of male seminal proteins in Drosophila (2002) Heredity, 88, pp. 85-93 
504 |a Wolfner, M.F., Applebaum, S., Heifetz, Y., Insect gonadal glands and their gene products (2005) Comprehensive Insect Physiology, Biochemistry, Pharmacology and Molecular Biology, pp. 179-212. , Elsevier, Amsterdam, L. Gilbert, K. Iatrau, S. Gill (Eds.) 
520 3 |a Post-mating sexual selection by means of sperm competition or cryptic female choice occurs in species in which females remate before exhausting sperm supplied by previous mates. Thus, sperm competition is expected to be stronger when inseminated females remate more frequently or take longer to deplete sperm load. Previous studies comparing oviposition behavior in the pair of closely related species Drosophila buzzatii and Drosophila koepferae suggest that inseminated females of the latter deplete sperm load more rapidly. Here, we investigate female remating in D. buzzatii and D. koepferae by studying how female remating propensity changes after mating. Our study reveals that, after mating, female D. buzzatii recovers receptivity 14 times faster and remate more frequently than D. koepferae. Thus, we argue that D. buzzatii exhibits greater chances that sperm from different mates meet inside the same female suggesting more complex post-mating interactions than in its sibling. In addition, our results show that there is intraspecific genetic variation for the duration of female refractory period in both species. © 2013 Elsevier Ltd.  |l eng 
536 |a Detalles de la financiación: Universidad de Buenos Aires 
536 |a Detalles de la financiación: Agencia Nacional de Promoción Científica y Tecnológica 
536 |a Detalles de la financiación: Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas 
536 |a Detalles de la financiación: The authors wish to thank R. Sampayo and members of the lab for comments that helped in different stages of the work reported herein. We thank T.A. Markow for critical remarks and advice on earlier versions of this paper. We are also grateful to two anonymous reviewers for thoughtful comments and suggestions. This work was supported with ANPCyT, CONICET and UBA grants. Juan Hurtado is recipient of scholarships awarded by CONICET and Esteban Hasson is member of Carrera del Investigador Científico of CONICET (Argentina). 
593 |a Instituto de Ecología Genética y Evolución de la ciudad de Buenos Aires, CONICET-Universidad de Buenos Aires (UBA), Buenos Aires, Argentina 
593 |a Departamento de Ecología, Genética y Evolución, Facultad de Ciencias Exactas y Naturales, UBA, Ciudad Universitaria, Pabellón II, C1428EGA Buenos Aires, Argentina 
690 1 0 |a FEMALE RECEPTIVITY 
690 1 0 |a FEMALE REFRACTORY PERIOD 
690 1 0 |a FEMALE REMATING 
690 1 0 |a SEXUAL SELECTION 
690 1 0 |a SPERM COMPETITION 
690 1 0 |a FEMALE 
690 1 0 |a FLY 
690 1 0 |a GENETIC VARIATION 
690 1 0 |a INTERSPECIFIC VARIATION 
690 1 0 |a INTRASPECIFIC VARIATION 
690 1 0 |a MATE CHOICE 
690 1 0 |a OVIPOSITION 
690 1 0 |a SEXUAL SELECTION 
690 1 0 |a SIBLING 
690 1 0 |a SPERM COMPETITION 
690 1 0 |a ANIMAL 
690 1 0 |a ARTICLE 
690 1 0 |a CACTACEAE 
690 1 0 |a COMPARATIVE STUDY 
690 1 0 |a DROSOPHILA 
690 1 0 |a FEMALE 
690 1 0 |a GENETICS 
690 1 0 |a MALE 
690 1 0 |a SEXUAL BEHAVIOR 
690 1 0 |a SPECIES DIFFERENCE 
690 1 0 |a TIME 
690 1 0 |a ANIMALS 
690 1 0 |a CACTACEAE 
690 1 0 |a DROSOPHILA 
690 1 0 |a FEMALE 
690 1 0 |a MALE 
690 1 0 |a SEXUAL BEHAVIOR, ANIMAL 
690 1 0 |a SPECIES SPECIFICITY 
690 1 0 |a TIME FACTORS 
690 1 0 |a DROSOPHILA BUZZATII 
690 1 0 |a DROSOPHILA KOEPFERAE 
700 1 |a Hasson, E. 
773 0 |d 2013  |g v. 59  |h pp. 569-576  |k n. 5  |p J. Insect Physiol.  |x 00221910  |w (AR-BaUEN)CENRE-668  |t Journal of Insect Physiology 
856 4 1 |u https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-84876422560&doi=10.1016%2fj.jinsphys.2013.03.007&partnerID=40&md5=1af4ff8fc74acd6969b2849443a9c03a  |y Registro en Scopus 
856 4 0 |u https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jinsphys.2013.03.007  |y DOI 
856 4 0 |u https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12110/paper_00221910_v59_n5_p569_Hurtado  |y Handle 
856 4 0 |u https://bibliotecadigital.exactas.uba.ar/collection/paper/document/paper_00221910_v59_n5_p569_Hurtado  |y Registro en la Biblioteca Digital 
961 |a paper_00221910_v59_n5_p569_Hurtado  |b paper  |c PE 
962 |a info:eu-repo/semantics/article  |a info:ar-repo/semantics/artículo  |b info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion 
963 |a VARI 
999 |c 72530