Quantifying edge effects: The role of habitat contrast and species specialization
Edge effect is a key process influencing populations and communities, particularly in fragmented landscapes. A general analytical framework has been proposed to quantify the strength of the edge effects (extent and magnitude); however, factors determining the later remain poorly explored. Using a co...
Guardado en:
| Autor principal: | |
|---|---|
| Otros Autores: | , , |
| Formato: | Capítulo de libro |
| Lenguaje: | Inglés |
| Publicado: |
2013
|
| Materias: | |
| Acceso en línea: | Registro en Scopus DOI Handle Registro en la Biblioteca Digital |
| Aporte de: | Registro referencial: Solicitar el recurso aquí |
| LEADER | 15370caa a22012017a 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | PAPER-11364 | ||
| 003 | AR-BaUEN | ||
| 005 | 20230518204130.0 | ||
| 008 | 190411s2013 xx ||||fo|||| 00| 0 eng|d | ||
| 024 | 7 | |2 scopus |a 2-s2.0-84880510346 | |
| 040 | |a Scopus |b spa |c AR-BaUEN |d AR-BaUEN | ||
| 100 | 1 | |a Peyras, M. | |
| 245 | 1 | 0 | |a Quantifying edge effects: The role of habitat contrast and species specialization |
| 260 | |c 2013 | ||
| 270 | 1 | 0 | |m Zurita, G. A.; CONICET, Facultad de Ciencias Forestales, Instituto de Biología Subtropical, Universidad Nacional de Misiones, Andresito 21, 3370 Puerto Iguazú, Misiones, Argentina; email: gazurita@ege.fcen.uba.ar |
| 506 | |2 openaire |e Política editorial | ||
| 504 | |a Baker, S.C., Barmuta, L.A., Evaluation spatial autocorrelation and depletion in pitfall-traps studies of environmental gradients (2006) J Insect Conserv, 10, pp. 269-276 | ||
| 504 | |a Banks Leite, C., Ewers, R.M., Metzger, J.P., Edge effects as the principal cause of area effects on birds in fragmented secondary forest (2010) Oikos, 119, pp. 918-926 | ||
| 504 | |a Barragán, F., Moreno, C.E., Escobar, F., Halffter, G., Navarrete, D., Negative impacts of human land use on dung beetle functional diversity (2011) PLoS ONE, 6, pp. e17976 | ||
| 504 | |a Campbell, R.E., Harding, J.S., Ewers, R.M., Thorpe, S., Didham, R.K., Production land use alters edge response functions in remnant forest invertebrate communities (2011) Ecol Appl, 21, pp. 3147-3161 | ||
| 504 | |a Colles, A., Liow, L.H., Prinzing, A., Are specialists at risk under environmental change? Neoecological, paleoecological and phylogenetic approaches (2009) Ecol Lett, 12, pp. 849-863 | ||
| 504 | |a Devictor, V., Julliard, R., Jiguet, F., Distribution of specialist and generalist species along spatial gradients of habitat disturbance and fragmentation (2008) Oikos, 117, pp. 507-514 | ||
| 504 | |a Didham, R.K., Lawton, J.H., Edge structure determines the magnitude of changes in microclimate and vegetation structure in tropical forest fragments (1999) Biotropica, 31, pp. 17-30 | ||
| 504 | |a Ewers, R.M., Didham, R.K., Continuous response functions for quantifying the strength of edge effects (2006) J Appl Ecol, 43, pp. 527-536 | ||
| 504 | |a Fagan, W.F., Cantrell, R.S., Cosner, C., How habitat edges change species interactions (1999) Am Nat, 153, pp. 165-182 | ||
| 504 | |a Fonseca, C.R., Joner, F., Two sided edge effect studies and the restoration of endangered ecosystems (2007) Restor Ecol, 15, pp. 613-619 | ||
| 504 | |a Gardner, T.A., Hernandez, M.I.M., Barlow, J., Peres, C.A., Understanding the biodiversity consequences of habitat change: the value of secondary and plantation forests for neotropical dung beetles (2008) J Appl Ecol, 45, pp. 883-893 | ||
| 504 | |a Hansbauer, M.M., Storch, I., Knauer, F., Pilz, S., Küchenhoff, H., Végvári, Z., Pimentel, R.G., Metzger, J.P., Landscape perception by forest understory birds in the Atlantic Rainforest: black-and-white versus shades of grey (2010) Land Ecol, 25, pp. 407-417 | ||
| 504 | |a Harper, K.A., Macdonald, S.E., Burton, P.J., Chen, J., Brosofske, K.D., Saunders, S.C., Euskirchen, E.S., Esseen, P.E.R.A., Edge influence on forest structure and composition in fragmented landscapes (2005) Conserv Biol, 19, pp. 768-782 | ||
| 504 | |a Julliard, R., Clavel, J., Devictor, V., Jiguet, F., Couvet, D., Spatial segregation of specialists and generalists in bird communities (2006) Ecol Lett, 9, pp. 1237-1244 | ||
| 504 | |a Klein, B.C., Effects of forest fragmentation on dung and carrion beetle communities in central Amazonia (1989) Ecology, 70, pp. 1715-1725 | ||
| 504 | |a Koh, L.P., Lee, T.M., Sodhi, N.S., Ghazoul, J., An overhaul of the speciesûarea approach for predicting biodiversity loss: incorporating matrix and edge effects (2010) J Appl Ecol, 47, pp. 1063-1070 | ||
| 504 | |a Kotze, D.J., Lehvävirta, S., Koivula, M., O'Hara, R.B., Spence, J.R., Effects of habitat edges and trampling on the distribution of ground beetles (Coleoptera, Carabaidae) in urban forests (2012) J Insect Conserv, , doi:10.1007/s1084101294752 | ||
| 504 | |a Kraft, N.J.B., Valencia, R., Ackerly, D.D., Functional traits and niche-based tree community assembly in an Amazonian forest (2008) Science, 322, pp. 580-582 | ||
| 504 | |a Lacerda, A.C.R., Tomas, W.M., Marinho-Filho, J., Domestic dogs as an edge effect in the Brasília National Park, Brazil: interactions with native mammals (2009) Animal Conserv, 12, pp. 477-487 | ||
| 504 | |a Larsen, T.H., Forsyth, A., Trap spacing and transect design for dung beetle biodiversity studies (2005) Biotropica, 37, pp. 322-325 | ||
| 504 | |a Lopes, J., Korasaki, V., Catelli, L.L., Marcal, V.V.M., Nunes, M.P.B.P., A comparison of dung beetle assemblage structure (Coleoptera: Scarabaeidae: Scarabaeinae) between an Atlantic forest fragment and adjacent abandoned pasture in Paraná (2011) Brazil. Zoologia, 28, pp. 72-79 | ||
| 504 | |a Murcia, C., Edge effects in fragmented forests: implications for conservation (1995) Trends Ecol Evol, 10, pp. 58-62 | ||
| 504 | |a Myers, N., Mittermeier, R.A., Mittermeier, C.G., da Fonseca, G.A.B., Kent, J., Biodiversity hotspots for conservation priorities (2000) Nature, 403, pp. 853-858 | ||
| 504 | |a Navarrete, D., Halffter, G., Dung beetle (Coleoptera: Scarabaeidae: Scarabaeinae) diversity in continuous forest, forest fragments and cattle pastures in a landscape of Chiapas, Mexico: the effects of anthropogenic changes (2008) Biodivers Conserv, 17, pp. 2869-2898 | ||
| 504 | |a Nichols, E., Larsen, T., Spector, S., Davis, A.L., Escobar, F., Favila, M., Vulinec, K., Global dung beetle response to tropical forest modification and fragmentation: a quantitative literature review and meta-analysis (2007) Biol Conserv, 137, pp. 1-19 | ||
| 504 | |a Nichols, E., Spector, S., Louzada, J., Larsen, T., Amezquita, S., Favila, M.E., Ecological functions and ecosystem services provided by Scarabaeinae dung beetles (2008) Biol Conserv, 141, pp. 1461-1474 | ||
| 504 | |a Pawson, S.M., Brockerhoff, E.G., Meenken, E.D., Didham, R.K., Non-native plantation forests as alternative habitat for native forest beetles in a heavily modified landscape (2008) Biodivers Conserv, 17, pp. 1127-1148 | ||
| 504 | |a Pe'er, G., Henle, K., Dislich, C., Frank, K., Breaking functional connectivity into components: a novel approach using an individual-based model, and first outcomes (2011) PLoS ONE, 6, pp. e22355 | ||
| 504 | |a Porensky, L.M., When edges meet: interacting edge effects in an African savanna (2011) J Ecol, 99, pp. 923-934 | ||
| 504 | |a Prevedello, J.A., Figueiredo, M.S.L., Grelle, C.E.V., Vieira, M.V., Rethinking edge effects: the unaccounted role of geometric constraints (2012) Ecography, , doi:10.1111/j.1600-0587.2012.07820.x | ||
| 504 | |a Qie, L., Lee, T.M., Sodhi, N.S., Lim, S.L.H., Dung beetle assemblages on tropical land bridge islands: small island effect and vulnerable species (2010) J Biogeogr, 38, pp. 792-804 | ||
| 504 | |a Reino, L., Beja, P., Osborne, P.E., Morgado, R., Fabipo, A., Rotenberry, J.T., Distance to edges, edge contrast and landscape fragmentation: Interactions affecting farmland birds around forest plantations (2009) Biol Conserv, 142, pp. 824-838 | ||
| 504 | |a Ries, L., Sisk, T.D., A predictive model of edge effects (2004) Ecology, 85, pp. 2917-2926 | ||
| 504 | |a Ries, L., Sisk, T.D., What is an edge species? The implications of sensitivity to habitat edges (2010) Oikos, 119, pp. 1636-1642 | ||
| 504 | |a Ries, L., Fletcher Jr., R.J., Battin, J., Sisk, T.D., Ecological responses to habitat edges: mechanisms, models, and variability explained (2004) Annu Rev Ecol Evol Syst, 35, pp. 491-522 | ||
| 504 | |a Rös, M., Escobar, F., Halffter, G., How dung beetles respond to a human modified variegated landscape in Mexican cloud forest: a study of biodiversity integrating ecological and biogeographical perspectives (2012) Divers Distrib, 18, pp. 377-389 | ||
| 504 | |a Scheffler, P.Y., Dung beetle (Coleoptera: Scarabaeidae) diversity and community structure across three disturbance regimes in eastern Amazonia (2005) J Trop Ecol, 21, pp. 9-19 | ||
| 504 | |a Silva, F.A.B., Costa, C.M.Q., Moura, R.C., Farias, A.I., Study of the dung beetle (Coleoptera: Scarabaeidae) community at two sites: Atlantic Forest and Clear-Cut, Pernambuco, Brazil (2010) Environ Entomol, 39, pp. 359-367 | ||
| 504 | |a Simmons, L.W., Ridsdill-Smith, T.J., (2011) Ecology and Evolution of Dung Beetles, , Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell | ||
| 504 | |a Soga, M., Kanno, N., Yamura, Y., Koike, S., Patch size determines the strength of edge effects on carabid beetle assemblages in urban remnant forest (2012) J Insect Conserv, , doi:10.1007/s108410129524x | ||
| 504 | |a Spector, S., Scarabaeine dung beetles (Coleoptera: Scarabaeidae: Scarabaeinae): an invertebrate focal taxon for biodiversity research and conservation (2006) Coleopt Bull, 60, pp. 71-83 | ||
| 504 | |a Spector, S., Ayzama, S., Rapid turnover and edge effects in dung beetle assemblages (Scarabaeidae) at a Bolivian neotropical forest savanna ecotone (2003) Biotropica, 35, pp. 394-404 | ||
| 504 | |a van Halder, I., Barbaro, L., Jactel, H., Conserving butterflies in fragmented plantation forests: are edge and interior habitats equally important (2011) J Insect Conserv, 15, pp. 591-601 | ||
| 504 | |a Vaz-De-Mello, F.Z., Edmonds, W.D., Ocampo, F.C., Schoolmeesters, P., A multilingual key to the genera and subgenera of the subfamily Scarabaeinae of the New World (Coleoptera: Scarabaeidae) (2011) Zootaxa, 2854, pp. 1-73 | ||
| 504 | |a Vázquez, D.P., Simberloff, D., Ecological specialization and susceptibility to disturbance: conjectures and refutations (2002) Am Nat, 159, pp. 606-623 | ||
| 504 | |a Verdú, J.R., Arellano, L., Numa, C., Micó, E., Roles of endothermy in niche differentiation for ball rolling dung beetles (Coleoptera: Scarabaeidae) along an altitudinal gradient (2007) Ecol Entomol, 32, pp. 544-551 | ||
| 504 | |a Wimp, G.M., Murphy, S.M., Lewis, D., Ries, L., Do edge responses cascade up or down a multi-trophic food web? (2011) Ecol Lett, 14, pp. 863-870 | ||
| 504 | |a Zurita, G.A., Bellocq, M.I., Spatial patterns of bird community similarity: bird responses to landscape composition and configuration in the Atlantic forest (2010) Landsc Ecol, 25, pp. 147-158 | ||
| 504 | |a Zurita, G.A., Bellocq, M.I., Bird assemblages in anthropogenic habitats: identifying a suitability gradient for native species in the Atlantic forest (2012) Biotropica, 44, pp. 412-419 | ||
| 504 | |a Zurita, G.A., Pe'er, G., Bellocq, M.I., Hansbauer, M.M., Edge effects and their influence on habitat suitability calculations: a continuous approach applied to birds of the Atlantic forest (2012) J Appl Ecol, 49, pp. 503-512 | ||
| 520 | 3 | |a Edge effect is a key process influencing populations and communities, particularly in fragmented landscapes. A general analytical framework has been proposed to quantify the strength of the edge effects (extent and magnitude); however, factors determining the later remain poorly explored. Using a continuous approach we explore the response of dung beetle species and assemblages to ecotones which differ in environmental dissimilarity in the Southern Atlantic forest of Argentina. Using baited pitfall traps and automatic sensors, we estimated dung beetle abundance, microclimatic conditions and vegetation structure along five different forest-plantations transects. At the assemblages level, the majority of species showed either edge avoidance or preference; however, the response depended on the environmental dissimilarity between habitats (plantation and native forest) and varied from a neutral response on mature plantations (low contrast ecotone) to edge avoidance on recent ones (high contrast ecotone). At the species level, the degree of habitat specialization explains the differential response of species to edge effects; more specialized species showed stronger edge response while generalist species showed softer or neutral responses. Environmental dissimilarity between confronted habitats and species specialization explain the quantitative component of edge effects on species and assemblages. Functional groups (rollers and tunnellers) often showed opposite responses to edge effects. At the landscape level, functional connectivity of forest fragments is probably drastically reduced by high contrasts matrices (such as recent plantations) for native forest species, whereas soft ecotones (such as native forest-mature plantations) maintained functional connectivity. These results are particularly relevant on highly fragmented landscapes, such as the Atlantic forest, where edge effect is probably one the most important mechanisms affecting native species and communities. © 2013 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht. |l eng | |
| 536 | |a Detalles de la financiación: Universidad de Buenos Aires | ||
| 536 | |a Detalles de la financiación: Agencia Nacional de Promoción Científica y Tecnológica, PICT | ||
| 536 | |a Detalles de la financiación: Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas | ||
| 536 | |a Detalles de la financiación: Acknowledgments Misiones provincial government (MERNyT of Misiones) and Alto Paraná S.A. gave the appropriate permissions for collecting dung-bettles. This project was funded by the Agencia Nacional de Promoción Científica y Tecnologica (PICT), CONICET and the Universidad de Buenos Aires. Federico Ocampo provided assistance on species identification. | ||
| 593 | |a CONICET, Departamento de Ecología, Genética y Evolución, FCEN, Universidad de Buenos Aires, Ciudad Universitaria, Pab. 2, Piso 4, C1428EHA Buenos Aires, Argentina | ||
| 593 | |a CONICET, Facultad de Ciencias Forestales, Instituto de Biología Subtropical, Universidad Nacional de Misiones, Andresito 21, 3370 Puerto Iguazú, Misiones, Argentina | ||
| 690 | 1 | 0 | |a ATLANTIC FOREST |
| 690 | 1 | 0 | |a DUNG BEETLES |
| 690 | 1 | 0 | |a EDGE EFFECT |
| 690 | 1 | 0 | |a QUANTITATIVE RESPONSE |
| 690 | 1 | 0 | |a SIGMOID RESPONSE |
| 690 | 1 | 0 | |a UNIMODAL RESPONSE |
| 690 | 1 | 0 | |a ABUNDANCE |
| 690 | 1 | 0 | |a BEETLE |
| 690 | 1 | 0 | |a ECOTONE |
| 690 | 1 | 0 | |a EDGE EFFECT |
| 690 | 1 | 0 | |a FOREST COVER |
| 690 | 1 | 0 | |a FUNCTIONAL GROUP |
| 690 | 1 | 0 | |a MICROCLIMATE |
| 690 | 1 | 0 | |a PREFERENCE BEHAVIOR |
| 690 | 1 | 0 | |a QUANTITATIVE ANALYSIS |
| 690 | 1 | 0 | |a SPECIALIST |
| 690 | 1 | 0 | |a SPECIALIZATION |
| 690 | 1 | 0 | |a COLEOPTERA |
| 651 | 4 | |a ARGENTINA | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Vespa, N.I. | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Bellocq, M.I. | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Zurita, G.A. | |
| 773 | 0 | |d 2013 |g v. 17 |h pp. 807-820 |k n. 4 |p J. Insect Conserv. |x 1366638X |t Journal of Insect Conservation | |
| 856 | 4 | 1 | |u https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-84880510346&doi=10.1007%2fs10841-013-9563-y&partnerID=40&md5=d34df52c7f694c73d8bb176e671d8afc |y Registro en Scopus |
| 856 | 4 | 0 | |u https://doi.org/10.1007/s10841-013-9563-y |y DOI |
| 856 | 4 | 0 | |u https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12110/paper_1366638X_v17_n4_p807_Peyras |y Handle |
| 856 | 4 | 0 | |u https://bibliotecadigital.exactas.uba.ar/collection/paper/document/paper_1366638X_v17_n4_p807_Peyras |y Registro en la Biblioteca Digital |
| 961 | |a paper_1366638X_v17_n4_p807_Peyras |b paper |c PE | ||
| 962 | |a info:eu-repo/semantics/article |a info:ar-repo/semantics/artículo |b info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion | ||
| 999 | |c 72317 | ||