|
|
|
|
| LEADER |
04457cam a2200553Ia 4500 |
| 001 |
990000656650204151 |
| 005 |
20241112145332.0 |
| 006 |
m o d |
| 007 |
cr#cn||||||||| |
| 008 |
110606s2008 enk ob 001 0 eng d |
| 019 |
|
|
|a 741453238
|a 752875903
|a 762699701
|a 816843994
|a 819503711
|a 821637076
|
| 020 |
|
|
|a 9780199709472 (electronic bk.)
|
| 020 |
|
|
|a 0199709475 (electronic bk.)
|
| 020 |
|
|
|a 9780195368574 (cloth : alk. paper)
|
| 020 |
|
|
|a 0195368576 (cloth : alk. paper)
|
| 020 |
|
|
|a 9781283130073
|
| 020 |
|
|
|a 1283130076
|
| 020 |
|
|
|a 0195368576
|
| 035 |
|
|
|a (OCoLC)000065665
|
| 035 |
|
|
|a (udesa)000065665USA01
|
| 035 |
|
|
|a (OCoLC)729244824
|z (OCoLC)741453238
|z (OCoLC)752875903
|z (OCoLC)762699701
|z (OCoLC)816843994
|z (OCoLC)819503711
|z (OCoLC)821637076
|
| 035 |
|
|
|a (OCoLC)990000656650204151
|
| 040 |
|
|
|a N$T
|c N$T
|d E7B
|d YDXCP
|d OCLCQ
|d OCLCE
|d EBLCP
|d OCLCQ
|d DEBSZ
|d OCLCO
|d OCLCQ
|d OCLCO
|d OCLCQ
|d NLGGC
|d OCLCQ
|d IDEBK
|d OCLCQ
|d U@S
|
| 042 |
|
|
|a dlr
|
| 043 |
|
|
|a n-us---
|
| 049 |
|
|
|a U@SA
|
| 050 |
|
4 |
|a HD3616.U47
|b R48 2008eb
|
| 082 |
0 |
4 |
|a 320.60973
|2 22
|
| 099 |
|
|
|a Recurso electrónico en INTERNET
|
| 100 |
1 |
|
|a Revesz, Richard L.,
|d 1958-
|
| 245 |
1 |
0 |
|a Retaking rationality
|h [recurso electrónico] :
|b how cost-benefit analysis can better protect the environment and our health /
|c Richard L. Revesz, Michael A. Livermore.
|
| 260 |
|
|
|a Oxford ;
|a New York :
|b Oxford University Press,
|c 2008.
|
| 300 |
|
|
|a 1 recurso en línea (viii, 254 p.).
|
| 516 |
|
|
|a Libro electrónico.
|
| 500 |
|
|
|a Título tomado de la pantalla de presentación (visto 2 de mayo de 2016)
|
| 538 |
|
|
|a Modo de acceso: a través de Internet.
|
| 504 |
|
|
|a Incluye referencias bibliográficas (p. 197-236) e índice.
|
| 505 |
0 |
|
|a Decisions are made by those who show up -- Eight fallacies of cost-benefit analysis -- Instituting regulatory rationality -- Self-fulfilling prophecies.
|
| 520 |
|
|
|a That America's natural environment has been degraded and despoiled over the past 25 years is beyond dispute. Nor has there been any shortage of reasons why-short-sighted politicians, a society built on over-consumption, and the dramatic weakening of environmental regulations. In Retaking Rationality, Richard Revesz and Michael Livermore argue convincingly that one of the least understood-and most important-causes of our failure to protect the environment has been a misguided rejection of reason. The authors show that environmentalists, labor unions, and other progressive groups have declined to participate in the key governmental proceedings concerning the cost-benefit analysis of federal regulations. As a result of this vacuum, industry groups have captured cost-benefit analysis and used it to further their anti-regulatory ends. Beginning in 1981, the federal Office of Management and Budget and the federal courts have used cost-benefit analysis extensively to determine which environmental, health, and safety regulations are approved and which are sent back to the drawing board. The resulting imbalance in political participation has profoundly affected the nation's regulatory and legal landscape. But Revesz and Livermore contend that economic analysis of regulations is necessary and that it needn't conflict with-and can in fact support-a more compassionate approach to environmental policy. Indeed, they show that we cannot give up on rationality if we truly want to protect our natural environment. Retaking Rationality makes clear that by embracing and reforming cost-benefit analysis, and by joining reason and compassion, progressive groups can help enact strong environmental and public health regulation.
|
| 650 |
|
0 |
|a Trade regulation
|z United States
|x Cost effectiveness.
|
| 650 |
|
0 |
|a Environmental law
|z United States
|x Cost effectiveness.
|
| 650 |
|
0 |
|a Public health laws
|z United States
|x Cost effectiveness.
|
| 650 |
|
0 |
|a Administrative agencies
|z United States
|x Decision making.
|
| 650 |
|
7 |
|a Comercio
|x Control
|z Estados Unidos
|x Efectividad en costos.
|2 UDESA
|
| 650 |
|
7 |
|a Derecho ambiental
|z Estados Unidos
|x Efectividad en costos.
|2 UDESA
|
| 650 |
|
7 |
|a Salud pública
|x Legislación
|z Estados Unidos
|x Efectividad en costos.
|2 UDESA
|
| 650 |
|
7 |
|a Agencias gubernamentales
|z Estados Unidos
|x Toma de decisiones.
|2 UDESA
|
| 700 |
1 |
|
|a Livermore, Michael A.
|
| 856 |
4 |
0 |
|z Solo para usuarios autorizados, varios accesos simultáneos
|u https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/sanandres/detail.action?docID=728789
|