The reception of Condillac in Argentina From the nineteenth-century professors of idéologie to José Ingenieros /

Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autor principal: Manzo, Silvia
Formato: Capítulo de libro
Lenguaje:Inglés
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.memoria.fahce.unlp.edu.ar/libros/pm.7179/pm.7179.pdf
Recurso relacionado
Aporte de:Registro referencial: Solicitar el recurso aquí
LEADER 02703naa a22002653a 4500
001 koha113127
003 AR-EnULPH
005 20250707182944.0
007 cr |||||||||||
008 250506s2023 us g 000 0 eng d
040 |a AR-EnULPH  |b spa  |c AR-EnULPH 
100 |a Manzo, Silvia  |0 (AR-EnULPH)0844ManzoS  |9 4198  |5 IDIHCS 
245 1 0 |a The reception of Condillac in Argentina  |h [recurso electrónico] :  |b From the nineteenth-century professors of idéologie to José Ingenieros /  |c Silvia Manzo 
300 |a p. 190-212 
540 |a Esta obra está bajo una licencia Creative Commons Atribución-NoComercial-CompartirIgual 4.0 Internacional  |u https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/ 
592 |a This chapter will explore the reception of Condillac in Argentina from the nineteenth century to the early twentieth century, focusing on two cases. First, the reception by nineteenth-century professors of idéologie (Juan Crisóstomo Lafinur, Juan Manuel Fernández de Agüero, Luis José de la Peña, and Diego Alcorta) that was mediated by the interpretations of Antoine Destutt de Tracy, Pierre Jean Cabanis, and Pierre Laromiguière. Second, the reception in the early twentieth century by José Ingenieros, whose narrative was conditioned by his own political and philosophical agenda. In each case, we can identify different receptions that must be interpreted not only in light of the philosophical concerns of the authors who made them but also in light of the wider cultural and political context in which they emerged. In the first half of the nineteenth century, Condillac was received as a philosopher who integrated the new philosophical canon that would replace the Scholastic canon that had been imposed by the colonial regime. In the early twentieth century, Ingenieros inserted Condillac into a narrative that, starting with Bacon and Locke, culminated in positivism, a current that, in his view, offered the best framework to make Argentina shine in the concert of civilized nations.   |l eng 
600 0 |a Ingenieros, José  |9 16633 
600 0 |a Condillac, Étienne Bonnot de  |9 67315 
690 1 4 |a Filosofía  |9 72 
773 |d Routledge, 2023  |t Condillac and His Reception: On the Nature and Origin of Human Abilities.  |z 9781032369785  |a A. Waldow, D. Antoine-Mahut (Eds.)   |w 0 
856 4 0 |u https://www.memoria.fahce.unlp.edu.ar/libros/pm.7179/pm.7179.pdf  |x MA 
856 4 2 |u https://philpapers.org/rec/MANTRO-40  |z Recurso relacionado 
942 |c CA  |2 udc 
952 |0 0  |1 0  |2 udc  |4 0  |6 PM7179  |7 3  |9 147059  |a MA  |d 2025-05-06  |l 0  |o pm.7179  |p pm.7179  |r 2025-05-06 09:14:40  |u https://www.memoria.fahce.unlp.edu.ar/libros/pm.7179/pm.7179.pdf  |w 2025-05-06  |y CA  |k 14  |b MEMORIA ACADEMICA 
999 |c 113127  |d 113126