Pan-Americanism in dispute. U.S. leaders, Bolívar, and San Martín in the centenaries of the Monroe Doctrine and the Amphictyonic Congress of Panama (1923-1926)

This paper analyzes the representations of U.S. statesmen, Bolívar, and San Martín during the centenaries of the Monroe Doctrine (1923) and the Congress of Panama (1926). On the one hand, it examines the characterizations of U.S. leaders and Bolívar, as well as the connections established between th...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autor principal: Amorebieta y Vera, María Laura
Formato: Artículo
Lenguaje:Inglés
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.memoria.fahce.unlp.edu.ar/art_revistas/pr.17557/pr.17557.pdf
https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/14701847.2024.2325292?scroll0top&needAccess=true
10.1080/14701847.2024.2325292
Aporte de:Registro referencial: Solicitar el recurso aquí
LEADER 02596nab a2200229 a 4500
001 ARTI17458
008 230422s2024####|||#####|#########0#####d
100 |a Amorebieta y Vera, María Laura 
245 1 0 |a Pan-Americanism in dispute. U.S. leaders, Bolívar, and San Martín in the centenaries of the Monroe Doctrine and the Amphictyonic Congress of Panama (1923-1926) 
041 7 |2 ISO 639-1  |a en 
300 |a  p.55-76 
520 3 |a This paper analyzes the representations of U.S. statesmen, Bolívar, and San Martín during the centenaries of the Monroe Doctrine (1923) and the Congress of Panama (1926). On the one hand, it examines the characterizations of U.S. leaders and Bolívar, as well as the connections established between them, in the public interventions of various agents and articulators of U.S. Pan-American policy in the Americas during both commemorations. On the other hand, it explores the tensions and exchanges that these operations generated with "Bolivarian" political and literary referents, who insisted on presenting the Liberator as the unique father of Pan-Americanism. Finally, this article focuses on the efforts of some important politicians and intellectuals of Argentine and Chilean origin who tried to attribute to San Martín and other historical figures of the time a significant role in the birth of continental solidarity and cooperation. Ultimately, I argue that these centenaries triggered a series of complex political-ideological interactions among numerous diplomats, politicians, and intellectuals from across the continent, proving that the 1920s was a time of strong hegemonic expectations in which history became a powerful and effective resource in the attempt to reorganize and/or secure the hierarchies of the inter-American order. 
653 |a Pan-Americanism 
653 |a Monroe Doctrine 
653 |a Congress of Panama 
653 |a Centenaries 
856 4 0 |u https://www.memoria.fahce.unlp.edu.ar/art_revistas/pr.17557/pr.17557.pdf 
856 4 1 |u https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/14701847.2024.2325292?scroll0top&needAccess=true 
856 |u 10.1080/14701847.2024.2325292 
952 |u https://www.memoria.fahce.unlp.edu.ar/art_revistas/pr.17557/pr.17557.pdf  |a MEMORIA ACADEMICA  |b MEMORIA ACADEMICA 
773 0 |7 nnas  |t Journal of Iberian and Latin American Studies.   |g Vol. 30 No. 1 (2024),55-76  |v 30  |l 1  |q 55-76  |d  : Taylor & Francis, 2024  |x ISSN 1326-0219  |k Research Article 
542 1 |f Esta obra está bajo una licencia Creative Commons Atribución-NoComercial-CompartirIgual 4.0 Internacional  |u https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/