Comparative behavior of wheat and barley associated with field release and grain weight determination

Double-cropping using the wheat-soybean sequence is a common practice in Argentina to promote the intensification of crops within rotations. However, the late release of the fields by a delayed harvest time in wheat determines soybean yield penalizations. In this context, barley could represent a be...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Otros Autores: Alvarez Prado, Santiago, Gallardo, José María, Serrago, Román Augusto, Kruk, Betina Claudia, Miralles, Daniel Julio
Formato: Artículo
Lenguaje:Inglés
Materias:
Acceso en línea:http://ri.agro.uba.ar/files/intranet/articulo/2013alvarezprado.pdf
LINK AL EDITOR
Aporte de:Registro referencial: Solicitar el recurso aquí
LEADER 08633cab a22013817a 4500
001 AR-BaUFA000534
003 AR-BaUFA
005 20250804150907.0
008 181208t2013 |||||o|||||00||||eng d
999 |c 46968  |d 46968 
022 |a 0378-4290 
024 |a 10.1016/j.fcr.2012.12.018 
040 |a AR-BaUFA  |c AR-BaUFA 
245 1 0 |a Comparative behavior of wheat and barley associated with field release and grain weight determination 
520 |a Double-cropping using the wheat-soybean sequence is a common practice in Argentina to promote the intensification of crops within rotations. However, the late release of the fields by a delayed harvest time in wheat determines soybean yield penalizations. In this context, barley could represent a better option than wheat preceding soybean in the crop rotation since there is some evidence that finishes its cycle earlier than wheat. However, it is not clear which period of barley shortens crop cycle allowing an earlier field release than wheat. The objectives of this study were to compare wheat and barley in terms of [i] field release and [ii] grain weight determination through the analysis of their physiological mechanisms. Field experiments during two consecutive growing seasons testing five different environments [three sowing dates in 2007 and two in 2008] were carried out to analyze the duration of different ontogenic periods and the attributes [dry matter and water dynamics] determining grain weight during the grain-filling period in wheat and barley. Early flowering time was the main cause of the early field release by barley as the grain filling and drying period were similar in both species. A strong relationship was found between dry matter and water dynamics in both species. Barley reached a higher maximum water content than wheat and also achieved physiological maturity with higher moisture concentration than wheat [48 and 39 percent, respectively]. Barley showed a slight increase in grain weight, respect to wheat, due to a source:sink ratio enhancement [4 percent and 9 percent for wheat and barley, respectively]. These data show an opposite response to that of Mediterranean, Australian and UK environments, where barley was under stronger sink limitation than wheat during the grain-filling period. 
653 0 |a FLOWERING TIME 
653 0 |a GRAIN-FILLING DURATION 
653 0 |a MAXIMUM WATER CONTENT 
653 0 |a MOISTURE CONCENTRATION 
653 0 |a SOURCE:SINK RATIO 
653 0 |a AGRICULTURAL INTENSIFICATION 
653 0 |a BARLEY 
653 0 |a COMPARATIVE STUDY 
653 0 |a CROP ROTATION 
653 0 |a CROP YIELD 
653 0 |a DATA PROCESSING 
653 0 |a DRY MATTER 
653 0 |a EXPERIMENTAL STUDY 
653 0 |a FIELD METHOD 
653 0 |a GRAIN SIZE 
653 0 |a GROWING SEASON 
653 0 |a MOISTURE CONTENT 
653 0 |a ONTOGENY 
653 0 |a PHYSIOLOGY 
653 0 |a WEIGHT 
653 0 |a WHEAT 
653 0 |a ARGENTINA 
700 1 |9 29122  |a Alvarez Prado, Santiago 
700 1 |a Gallardo, José María  |9 30052 
700 1 |9 12536  |a Serrago, Román Augusto 
700 1 |9 9684  |a Kruk, Betina Claudia 
700 1 |9 6438  |a Miralles, Daniel Julio 
773 |t Field Crops Research  |g vol.144 (2013), p.28-33 
856 |u http://ri.agro.uba.ar/files/intranet/articulo/2013alvarezprado.pdf  |i En reservorio  |q application/pdf  |f 2013alvarezprado  |x MIGRADOS2018 
856 |u http://www.elsevier.com/  |x MIGRADOS2018  |z LINK AL EDITOR 
900 |a as 
900 |a 20141009 
900 |a N13 
900 |a SCOPUS 
900 |a N13SCOPUS 
900 |a a 
900 |a s 
900 |a ARTICULO 
900 |a EN LINEA 
900 |a 03784290 
900 |a 10.1016/j.fcr.2012.12.018 
900 |a ^tComparative behavior of wheat and barley associated with field release and grain weight determination 
900 |a ^aAlvarez Prado^bS. 
900 |a ^aGallardo^bJ.M. 
900 |a ^aSerrago^bR.A. 
900 |a ^aKruk^bB.C. 
900 |a ^aMiralles^bD.J. 
900 |a ^aAlvarez Prado^bS. 
900 |a ^aGallardo^bJ. M. 
900 |a ^aSerrago^bR. A. 
900 |a ^aKruk^bB. C. 
900 |a ^aMiralles^bD. J. 
900 |a ^aAlvarez Prado, S.^tCátedra de Cerealicultura, Departamento de Producción Vegetal, Universidad de Buenos Aires, Av. San Martín 4453 (C 1417 DSE), Ciudad de Buenos Aires, Argentina 
900 |a ^aGallardo, J.M.^tCátedra de Cerealicultura, Departamento de Producción Vegetal, Universidad de Buenos Aires, Av. San Martín 4453 (C 1417 DSE), Ciudad de Buenos Aires, Argentina 
900 |a ^aSerrago, R.A.^tCátedra de Cerealicultura, Departamento de Producción Vegetal, Universidad de Buenos Aires, Av. San Martín 4453 (C 1417 DSE), Ciudad de Buenos Aires, Argentina 
900 |a ^aSerrago, R.A.^tIFEVA, CONICET, Av. San Martín 4453 (C 1417 DSE), Ciudad de Buenos Aires, Argentina 
900 |a ^aKruk, B.C.^tCátedra de Cerealicultura, Departamento de Producción Vegetal, Universidad de Buenos Aires, Av. San Martín 4453 (C 1417 DSE), Ciudad de Buenos Aires, Argentina 
900 |a ^aMiralles, D.J.^tCátedra de Cerealicultura, Departamento de Producción Vegetal, Universidad de Buenos Aires, Av. San Martín 4453 (C 1417 DSE), Ciudad de Buenos Aires, Argentina 
900 |a ^aMiralles, D.J.^tIFEVA, CONICET, Av. San Martín 4453 (C 1417 DSE), Ciudad de Buenos Aires, Argentina 
900 |a ^tField Crops Research^cField Crops Res. 
900 |a en 
900 |a 28 
900 |a ^i 
900 |a Vol. 144 
900 |a 33 
900 |a FLOWERING TIME 
900 |a GRAIN-FILLING DURATION 
900 |a MAXIMUM WATER CONTENT 
900 |a MOISTURE CONCENTRATION 
900 |a SOURCE:SINK RATIO 
900 |a AGRICULTURAL INTENSIFICATION 
900 |a BARLEY 
900 |a COMPARATIVE STUDY 
900 |a CROP ROTATION 
900 |a CROP YIELD 
900 |a DATA PROCESSING 
900 |a DRY MATTER 
900 |a EXPERIMENTAL STUDY 
900 |a FIELD METHOD 
900 |a GRAIN SIZE 
900 |a GROWING SEASON 
900 |a MOISTURE CONTENT 
900 |a ONTOGENY 
900 |a PHYSIOLOGY 
900 |a WEIGHT 
900 |a WHEAT 
900 |a ARGENTINA 
900 |a Double-cropping using the wheat-soybean sequence is a common practice in Argentina to promote the intensification of crops within rotations. However, the late release of the fields by a delayed harvest time in wheat determines soybean yield penalizations. In this context, barley could represent a better option than wheat preceding soybean in the crop rotation since there is some evidence that finishes its cycle earlier than wheat. However, it is not clear which period of barley shortens crop cycle allowing an earlier field release than wheat. The objectives of this study were to compare wheat and barley in terms of [i] field release and [ii] grain weight determination through the analysis of their physiological mechanisms. Field experiments during two consecutive growing seasons testing five different environments [three sowing dates in 2007 and two in 2008] were carried out to analyze the duration of different ontogenic periods and the attributes [dry matter and water dynamics] determining grain weight during the grain-filling period in wheat and barley. Early flowering time was the main cause of the early field release by barley as the grain filling and drying period were similar in both species. A strong relationship was found between dry matter and water dynamics in both species. Barley reached a higher maximum water content than wheat and also achieved physiological maturity with higher moisture concentration than wheat [48 and 39 percent, respectively]. Barley showed a slight increase in grain weight, respect to wheat, due to a source:sink ratio enhancement [4 percent and 9 percent for wheat and barley, respectively]. These data show an opposite response to that of Mediterranean, Australian and UK environments, where barley was under stronger sink limitation than wheat during the grain-filling period. 
900 |a 144 
900 |a 2013 
900 |a ^cH 
900 |a AAG 
900 |a AGROVOC 
900 |a 2013alvarezprado 
900 |a AAG 
900 |a http://ri.agro.uba.ar/files/intranet/articulo/2013alvarezprado.pdf 
900 |a 2013alvarezprado.pdf 
900 |a http://www.elsevier.com/ 
900 |a http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?eid=2-s2.0-84874581635&partnerID=40&md5=bf8294c7f34aa60891b467cddf1449f6 
900 |a ^a^b^c^d^e^f^g^h^i 
900 |a OS 
942 0 0 |c ARTICULO  |2 udc 
942 0 0 |c ENLINEA  |2 udc