A comparison of methods for the detection of Ascochyta rabiei in chickpea seeds

Mostrar otras versiones (2)

Seed health is one of the most important factors affecting the quality of chickpea (Cicer arietinum) seeds. The present study aimed to compare and identify the best incubation methods for detecting Ascochyta rabiei associated with chickpea seeds. Four protocols were compared for their sensitivity in...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Otros Autores: Sautua, Francisco José, Casey, Santiago Agustín, Zapata, Raúl Lorenzo, Scandiani, María Mercedes, Carmona, Marcelo Aníbal
Formato: Artículo
Lenguaje:Inglés
Materias:
ASCOCHYTA BLIGHT
CICER ARIETINUM
STANDARD BLOTTER TEST
PDA PLATE TEST
Acceso en línea:http://ri.agro.uba.ar/files/download/articulo/2019sautua2.pdf
LINK AL EDITOR
Aporte de:Registro referencial: Solicitar el recurso aquí
Biblioteca Central (FAUBA) de Universidad de Buenos Aires
LEADER 03112nab a22003857a 4500
001 20200303151825.0
003 AR-BaUFA
005 20220621123926.0
008 200303t2019 bl |||||o|||| 00| 0 eng d
999 |c 47866  |d 47866 
999 |d 47866 
999 |d 47866 
999 |d 47866 
999 |d 47866 
022 |a 1980-5454 
024 |a 10.1590/0100-5405/185396 
040 |a AR-BaUFA 
245 1 0 |a A comparison of methods for the detection of Ascochyta rabiei in chickpea seeds 
246 0 0 |a Comparação de métodos para detecção de Ascochyta rabiei em sementes de grão - de - bico 
520 |a Seed health is one of the most important factors affecting the quality of chickpea (Cicer arietinum) seeds. The present study aimed to compare and identify the best incubation methods for detecting Ascochyta rabiei associated with chickpea seeds. Four protocols were compared for their sensitivity in detecting A. rabiei: T1) Incubation on paper substrate or filter paper method (blotter test) without surface disinfection, T2) Blotter test through the water restriction technique, T3) PDA plate test, and T4) MEA plate test. Four independent chickpea seed lots, naturally infected with A. rabiei, were sampled from Córdoba Province and other four were sampled from Buenos Aires Province, Argentina. Each treatment was applied to a total of 400 seeds from each locality for the methods to be comparable. T2 and T3 were statistically more sensitive in detecting A. rabiei-infected seeds from Córdoba. Only these two treatments were repeated for seeds from Buenos Aires Province, and T3 proved to be more sensitive; thus, it is recommended for routine sanitary analysis of chickpea seeds. 
653 |a ASCOCHYTA BLIGHT 
653 |a CICER ARIETINUM 
653 |a STANDARD BLOTTER TEST 
653 |a PDA PLATE TEST 
700 1 |9 22833  |a Sautua, Francisco José  |u Universidad de Buenos Aires. Facultad de Agronomía. Departamento de Producción Vegetal. Cátedra de Fitopatología. Buenos Aires, Argentina. 
700 1 |a Casey, Santiago Agustín  |u Universidad de Buenos Aires. Facultad de Agronomía. Departamento de Producción Vegetal. Cátedra de Fitopatología. Buenos Aires, Argentina.  |9 37614 
700 1 |9 28761  |a Zapata, Raúl Lorenzo  |u Universidad de Buenos Aires. Facultad de Agronomía. Departamento de Producción Vegetal. Cátedra de Fitopatología. Buenos Aires, Argentina. 
700 1 |9 32186  |a Scandiani, María Mercedes  |u Universidad Nacional de Rosario. Centro de Referencia de Micología (CEREMIC). Facultad de Ciencias Bioquímicas y Farmacéuticas. Rosario, Argentina. 
700 1 |9 3109  |a Carmona, Marcelo Aníbal  |u Universidad de Buenos Aires. Facultad de Agronomía. Departamento de Producción Vegetal. Cátedra de Fitopatología. Buenos Aires, Argentina. 
773 |g vol.45, no.2 (2019), p.197-199, tbls.  |t Summa Phytopathologica 
856 |f 2019sautua2  |i en Internet  |q application/pdf  |u http://ri.agro.uba.ar/files/download/articulo/2019sautua2.pdf  |x ARTI202003 
856 |u http://www.scielo.br/  |z LINK AL EDITOR 
942 |c ENLINEA 
942 |c ARTICULO 
976 |a AAG 

Ejemplares similares