Changes in topsoil bulk density after grazing crop residues under no - till farming

The grazing of crop residues during the winter in integrated crop–livestock systems can either increase soil bulk density (BD) by compaction or decrease BD by swelling, as a function of gravimetric soil water content (GW) during grazing. A field experiment was conducted from 2005 to 2008 to evaluate...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Otros Autores: Fernández, Patricia Lilia, Alvarez, Carina Rosa, Schindler, Valeria, Taboada, Miguel Angel
Formato: Artículo
Lenguaje:Inglés
Materias:
Acceso en línea:http://ri.agro.uba.ar/files/intranet/articulo/2010fernandez3.pdf
LINK AL EDITOR
Aporte de:Registro referencial: Solicitar el recurso aquí
LEADER 03693nab a22003737a 4500
001 20191104122454.0
003 AR-BaUFA
005 20220920131050.0
008 191104t2010 ne d||||o|||| 00| 0 eng d
999 |c 47689  |d 47689 
999 |d 47689 
999 |d 47689 
999 |d 47689 
999 |d 47689 
999 |d 47689 
022 |a 0016-7061 
024 |a 10.1016/j.geoderma.2010.06.010 
040 |a AR-BaUFA  |c AR-BaUFA 
245 1 |a Changes in topsoil bulk density after grazing crop residues under no - till farming 
520 |a The grazing of crop residues during the winter in integrated crop–livestock systems can either increase soil bulk density (BD) by compaction or decrease BD by swelling, as a function of gravimetric soil water content (GW) during grazing. A field experiment was conducted from 2005 to 2008 to evaluate the BD response to grazing in a no-till silty loam soil (Typic Argiudoll) of the Pampas region of Argentina. Soil BD (core method), GW data and the calculated air volume (AV) were obtained from the 0–50 mm and 50–100 mm layers at different sampling times from ungrazed and grazed treatments. Over most of the study period (2006 through 2008) soil BD showed little impact from grazing, with minimal temporal variation (1.32–1.46 Mg m−3). This stable behavior was ascribed to low rainfall and relatively low GW values at the time when soil was trampled by livestock and routinely trafficked by machinery. Soil BD in the upper (0–50 mm) layer was significantly (pb0.001) lower at the beginning of the study (2005 to early 2006), when the rainfall was higher (as was soil GW) during transit periods. Lower BD was not due to soil swelling but to air that was trapped by kneading in response to transit of livestock and machinery. Fitted straight lines indicated that this process became particularly prominent when GW was N330 g kg−1 in the ungrazed treatment and GW was N240 g kg−1 in the grazed treatments. Grazing accentuated the soil kneading process that promoted air entrapment. Our results suggest in this no-tilled silt loam soil that winter grazing of crop residues caused no deterioration of topsoil porosity in the no-tilled silty loam soil. 
653 |a SOIL SWELLING 
653 |a VOLUMETRIC ANALYSIS 
653 |a WATER REGIMES 
653 |a SOIL DYNAMICS 
700 1 |9 33912  |a Fernández, Patricia Lilia  |u Universidad de Buenos Aires. Facultad de Agronomía. Departamento de Ingeniería Agrícola y Uso de la Tierra. Cátedra de Fertilidad y Fertilizantes. Buenos Aires, Argentina. 
700 1 |9 7471  |a Alvarez, Carina Rosa  |u Universidad de Buenos Aires. Facultad de Agronomía. Departamento de Ingeniería Agrícola y Uso de la Tierra. Cátedra de Fertilidad y Fertilizantes. Buenos Aires, Argentina. 
700 1 |9 6444  |a Schindler, Valeria  |u Universidad de Buenos Aires. Facultad de Agronomía. Departamento de Producción Animal. Cátedra de Mejoramiento Genético Animal. Buenos Aires, Argentina. 
700 1 |9 9839  |a Taboada, Miguel Angel  |u Universidad de Buenos Aires. Facultad de Agronomía. Departamento de Ingeniería Agrícola y Uso de la Tierra. Cátedra de Fertilidad y Fertilizantes. Buenos Aires, Argentina.  |u Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria (INTA). Instituto de Suelos Castelar. Hurlingham, Buenos Aires, Argentina.  |u CONICET. Buenos Aires, Argentina. 
773 0 |t Geoderma  |g vol.159, no.1-2 (2010), p.24-30, grafs.  |w (AR-BaUFA)SECS000095 
856 |f 2010fernandez3  |i En Reservorio:  |q application/pdf  |u http://ri.agro.uba.ar/files/intranet/articulo/2010fernandez3.pdf  |x ARTI201911 
856 |u https://www.elsevier.com  |z LINK AL EDITOR 
942 |c ARTICULO 
942 |c ENLINEA 
976 |a AAG