Ecosystem services provided by agroecosystems a qualitative and quantitative assessment of this relationship in the Pampa Region, Argentina

The development of an analytical framework relating agricultural conditions and ecosystem services [ES] provision could be very useful for developing land-use systems which sustain natural resources for future use. According to this, a conceptual network was developed, based on literature review and...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autor principal: Rositano, Florencia
Otros Autores: Ferraro, Diego Omar
Formato: Artículo
Lenguaje:Español
Materias:
Acceso en línea:http://ri.agro.uba.ar/files/intranet/articulo/2014rositano.pdf
LINK AL EDITOR
Aporte de:Registro referencial: Solicitar el recurso aquí
LEADER 04438cab a22009857a 4500
001 AR-BaUFA000687
003 AR-BaUFA
005 20220223143413.0
008 181208t2014 |||||o|||||00||||spa d
999 |c 47083  |d 47083 
999 |d 47083 
022 |a 0364-152X 
024 |a 10.1007/s00267-013-0211-9 
040 |a AR-BaUFA 
100 1 |a Rositano, Florencia  |9 27337 
245 0 0 |a Ecosystem services provided by agroecosystems  |b a qualitative and quantitative assessment of this relationship in the Pampa Region, Argentina 
520 |a The development of an analytical framework relating agricultural conditions and ecosystem services [ES] provision could be very useful for developing land-use systems which sustain natural resources for future use. According to this, a conceptual network was developed, based on literature review and expert knowledge, about the functional relationships between agricultural management and ES provision in the Pampa region [Argentina]. We selected eight ES to develop this conceptual network: [1] carbon [C] balance, [2] nitrogen [N] balance, [3] groundwater contamination control, [4] soil water balance, [5] soil structural maintenance, [6] N2O emission control, [7] regulation of biotic adversities, and [8] biodiversity maintenance. This conceptual network revealed a high degree of interdependence among ES provided by Pampean agroecosystems, finding two trade-offs, and two synergies among them. Then, we analyzed the conceptual network structure, and found that both environmental and management variables influenced ES provision. Finally, we selected four ES to parameterize and quantify along 10 growing seasons [2000/2001-2009/2010] through a probabilistic methodology called Bayesian Networks. Only N balance was negatively impacted by agricultural management; while C balance, groundwater contamination control, and N2O emission control were not. Outcomes of our work emphasize the idea that qualitative and quantitative methodologies should be implemented together to assess ES provision in Pampean agroecosystems, as well as in other agricultural systems. 
650 |2 Agrovoc  |9 26 
653 0 |a AGRICULTURAL MANAGEMENT 
653 0 |a AGRICULTURE 
653 0 |a AGRO-ECOSYSTEMS 
653 0 |a AGROECOSYSTEM 
653 0 |a AIR POLLUTION CONTROL 
653 0 |a ARGENTINA 
653 0 |a BAYES THEOREM 
653 0 |a BAYESIAN NETWORKS 
653 0 |a BENEFICIAL ORGANISM 
653 0 |a BIODIVERSITY 
653 0 |a BIOLOGICAL MODEL 
653 0 |a CARBON 
653 0 |a CARBON BALANCE 
653 0 |a CHEMISTRY 
653 0 |a CONCEPTUAL NETWORK 
653 0 |a CONSERVATION OF NATURAL RESOURCES 
653 0 |a CONTAMINATION 
653 0 |a CONTROLLED STUDY 
653 0 |a CROP PRODUCTION 
653 0 |a DELPHI STUDY 
653 0 |a DENITRIFICATION 
653 0 |a ECOSYSTEM 
653 0 |a ECOSYSTEM SERVICES 
653 0 |a ECOSYSTEMS 
653 0 |a EMISSION CONTROL 
653 0 |a ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION 
653 0 |a EVAPORATION 
653 0 |a EXPERT ELICITATION 
653 0 |a GROUND WATER 
653 0 |a GROUNDWATER 
653 0 |a GROUNDWATER CONTAMINATION 
653 0 |a GROWING SEASON 
653 0 |a HARVEST 
653 0 |a LITERATURE REVIEW 
653 0 |a LITERATURE REVIEWS 
653 0 |a MAINTENANCE 
653 0 |a MAIZE 
653 0 |a METABOLISM 
653 0 |a MODELS, BIOLOGICAL 
653 0 |a NITROGEN 
653 0 |a NITROGEN 
653 0 |a NITROGEN BALANCE 
653 0 |a NITROGEN OXIDE 
653 0 |a NITROUS OXIDE 
653 0 |a NONHUMAN 
653 0 |a PAMPEAN AGROECOSYSTEMS 
653 0 |a PLANT RESIDUE 
653 0 |a PROBABILISTIC METHODOLOGY 
653 0 |a PROCEDURES 
653 0 |a QUALITATIVE ANALYSIS 
653 0 |a QUALITATIVE AND QUANTITATIVE ASSESSMENTS 
653 0 |a QUANTITATIVE ANALYSIS 
653 0 |a QUANTITATIVE METHODOLOGY 
653 0 |a SOIL 
653 0 |a SOIL FERTILIZATION 
653 0 |a SOIL TEMPERATURE 
653 0 |a SOIL WATER 
653 0 |a SOYBEAN 
653 0 |a SPECIES COMPOSITION 
653 0 |a WATER CONTAMINATION 
700 1 |9 11063  |a Ferraro, Diego Omar 
773 |t Environmental Management  |g vol.53, no.3 (2014), p.606-619 
856 |u http://ri.agro.uba.ar/files/intranet/articulo/2014rositano.pdf  |i En reservorio  |q application/pdf  |f 2014rositano  |x MIGRADOS2018 
856 |u http://www.springer.com/  |x MIGRADOS2018  |z LINK AL EDITOR 
942 0 0 |c ARTICULO 
942 0 0 |c ENLINEA 
976 |a AAG