Phenotypic variations between non - transgenic and transgenic maize hybrids
The use of transgenic maize [Zea mays L.] hybrids [Bt, RR, Bt-RR] has simplified crop husbandry, mainly due to a more effective control of pests and weeds. The effects of transgenes insertion on phenotypic traits of maize hybrids are not fully documented, especially without the incidence of pests an...
Guardado en:
| Autor principal: | |
|---|---|
| Otros Autores: | , |
| Formato: | Artículo |
| Lenguaje: | Inglés |
| Materias: | |
| Acceso en línea: | http://ri.agro.uba.ar/files/intranet/articulo/2012Laserna.pdf LINK AL EDITOR |
| Aporte de: | Registro referencial: Solicitar el recurso aquí |
| LEADER | 07896cab a22012017a 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | AR-BaUFA000383 | ||
| 003 | AR-BaUFA | ||
| 005 | 20220524102529.0 | ||
| 008 | 181208t2012 |||||o|||||00||||eng d | ||
| 999 | |c 46817 |d 46817 | ||
| 022 | |a 0378-4290 | ||
| 024 | |a 10.1016/j.fcr.2012.06.005 | ||
| 040 | |a AR-BaUFA |c AR-BaUFA | ||
| 100 | 1 | |a Laserna, M. P. |9 71592 | |
| 245 | 0 | 0 | |a Phenotypic variations between non - transgenic and transgenic maize hybrids |
| 520 | |a The use of transgenic maize [Zea mays L.] hybrids [Bt, RR, Bt-RR] has simplified crop husbandry, mainly due to a more effective control of pests and weeds. The effects of transgenes insertion on phenotypic traits of maize hybrids are not fully documented, especially without the incidence of pests and weeds. The objectives of this work were [i] to establish phenotypic differences in terms of phenology, growth and yield among a non-transgenic maize hybrid and their transgenic versions [Bt hybrid, RR hybrid and Bt-RR hybrid] and among the transgenic versions of other genetic background and [ii] to analyze the impact of crowding stress on inter-plant variability of the different traits under study. Field experiments were conducted in Buenos Aires [34°36'S, 58°26'W], Argentina during 2008-2009 [Exp 1], 2009-2010 [Exp 2] and 2010-2011 [Exp 3]. Genotypes were cultivated at contrasting plant densities [6 and 12plm -2 in Exp 1 and Exp 2] and with contrasting inter-plant spaces within the row [Exp 3], irrigated, without nutrient limitations, and with chemical and mechanical controls of weed and animal pests. At both plant densities, phenotypic variability of several traits among versions within each group was recorded. For example, the RR version of DK747 group had the shortest thermal time to flowering. The stacked transgenic hybrids DK747MGRR and DK190MGRR, exhibited the highest ear growth rate [EGR CP] during the critical period for kernel set. However, both genotypes had the lowest reproductive efficiency [i.e. kernel number per unit of EGR CP], that counterbalanced their higher EGR CP. Only the Bt-RR version of DK747 showed a higher inter-plant variability [CV] of EGR CP at low mean EGR CP values a symptom of the intolerance of this genotype to crowing stress. Consequently, the different versions of each group of hybrids had a similar kernel number per plant and grain yield. We conclude that the introduction of transgenes may alter in some way, the behavior of plants in different eco-physiological aspects in the absence of pests and weeds. | ||
| 653 | 0 | |a MAIZE | |
| 653 | 0 | |a NON-TRANSGENIC HYBRID | |
| 653 | 0 | |a PHENOTYPIC VARIATION | |
| 653 | 0 | |a TRANSGENIC HYBRID | |
| 653 | 0 | |a ZEA MAYS | |
| 653 | 0 | |a BIOCONTROL AGENT | |
| 653 | 0 | |a BIOLOGICAL CONTROL | |
| 653 | 0 | |a CROP YIELD | |
| 653 | 0 | |a ECOPHYSIOLOGY | |
| 653 | 0 | |a GENOTYPE | |
| 653 | 0 | |a GROWTH RATE | |
| 653 | 0 | |a HYBRID | |
| 653 | 0 | |a NUTRIENT LIMITATION | |
| 653 | 0 | |a PHENOLOGY | |
| 653 | 0 | |a SYMPTOM | |
| 653 | 0 | |a TRANSGENIC PLANT | |
| 653 | 0 | |a WEED CONTROL | |
| 653 | 0 | |a ARGENTINA | |
| 653 | 0 | |a BUENOS AIRES [ARGENTINA] | |
| 653 | 0 | |a ANIMALIA | |
| 700 | 1 | |9 7271 |a Maddonni, Gustavo Angel | |
| 700 | 1 | |9 44389 |a López, César G. | |
| 773 | |t Field Crops Research |g Vol.134 (2012), p.175-184 | ||
| 856 | |u http://ri.agro.uba.ar/files/intranet/articulo/2012Laserna.pdf |i En reservorio |q application/pdf |f 2012Laserna |x MIGRADOS2018 | ||
| 856 | |u http://www.elsevier.com/ |x MIGRADOS2018 |z LINK AL EDITOR | ||
| 900 | |a as | ||
| 900 | |a 20131220 | ||
| 900 | |a N | ||
| 900 | |a SCOPUS | ||
| 900 | |a a | ||
| 900 | |a s | ||
| 900 | |a ARTICULO | ||
| 900 | |a EN LINEA | ||
| 900 | |a 03784290 | ||
| 900 | |a 10.1016/j.fcr.2012.06.005 | ||
| 900 | |a ^tPhenotypic variations between non-transgenic and transgenic maize hybrids | ||
| 900 | |a ^aLaserna^bM.P. | ||
| 900 | |a ^aMaddonni^bG.A. | ||
| 900 | |a ^aLópez^bC.G. | ||
| 900 | |a ^aLaserna^bM. P. | ||
| 900 | |a ^aMaddonni^bG. A. | ||
| 900 | |a ^aLópez^bC. G. | ||
| 900 | |a ^aLaserna^bM.P.^tInstituto de Investigaciones Fisiologicas y Ecologicas Vinculadas a la Agricultura [IFEVA], Departamento de Producción Vegetal, Facultad de AgronomÃa, Universidad de Buenos Aires, Av. San MartÃn 4453, Ciudad de Buenos Aires [C1417DSE], Argentina | ||
| 900 | |a ^aMaddonni^bG.A.^tCátedra de Mejoramiento Genético, Facultad de Ciencias Agrarias, Universidad Nacional de Lomas de Zamora, Ruta 4 km 2, Lomas de Zamora [CP1836], Argentina | ||
| 900 | |a ^aLópez^bC.G. | ||
| 900 | |a ^tField Crops Research^cField Crops Res. | ||
| 900 | |a en | ||
| 900 | |a 175 | ||
| 900 | |a ^i | ||
| 900 | |a Vol. 134 | ||
| 900 | |a 184 | ||
| 900 | |a MAIZE | ||
| 900 | |a NON-TRANSGENIC HYBRID | ||
| 900 | |a PHENOTYPIC VARIATION | ||
| 900 | |a TRANSGENIC HYBRID | ||
| 900 | |a ZEA MAYS | ||
| 900 | |a BIOCONTROL AGENT | ||
| 900 | |a BIOLOGICAL CONTROL | ||
| 900 | |a CROP YIELD | ||
| 900 | |a ECOPHYSIOLOGY | ||
| 900 | |a GENOTYPE | ||
| 900 | |a GROWTH RATE | ||
| 900 | |a HYBRID | ||
| 900 | |a NUTRIENT LIMITATION | ||
| 900 | |a PHENOLOGY | ||
| 900 | |a SYMPTOM | ||
| 900 | |a TRANSGENIC PLANT | ||
| 900 | |a WEED CONTROL | ||
| 900 | |a ARGENTINA | ||
| 900 | |a BUENOS AIRES [ARGENTINA] | ||
| 900 | |a ANIMALIA | ||
| 900 | |a The use of transgenic maize [Zea mays L.] hybrids [Bt, RR, Bt-RR] has simplified crop husbandry, mainly due to a more effective control of pests and weeds. The effects of transgenes insertion on phenotypic traits of maize hybrids are not fully documented, especially without the incidence of pests and weeds. The objectives of this work were [i] to establish phenotypic differences in terms of phenology, growth and yield among a non-transgenic maize hybrid and their transgenic versions [Bt hybrid, RR hybrid and Bt-RR hybrid] and among the transgenic versions of other genetic background and [ii] to analyze the impact of crowding stress on inter-plant variability of the different traits under study. Field experiments were conducted in Buenos Aires [34°36'S, 58°26'W], Argentina during 2008-2009 [Exp 1], 2009-2010 [Exp 2] and 2010-2011 [Exp 3]. Genotypes were cultivated at contrasting plant densities [6 and 12plm -2 in Exp 1 and Exp 2] and with contrasting inter-plant spaces within the row [Exp 3], irrigated, without nutrient limitations, and with chemical and mechanical controls of weed and animal pests. At both plant densities, phenotypic variability of several traits among versions within each group was recorded. For example, the RR version of DK747 group had the shortest thermal time to flowering. The stacked transgenic hybrids DK747MGRR and DK190MGRR, exhibited the highest ear growth rate [EGR CP] during the critical period for kernel set. However, both genotypes had the lowest reproductive efficiency [i.e. kernel number per unit of EGR CP], that counterbalanced their higher EGR CP. Only the Bt-RR version of DK747 showed a higher inter-plant variability [CV] of EGR CP at low mean EGR CP values a symptom of the intolerance of this genotype to crowing stress. Consequently, the different versions of each group of hybrids had a similar kernel number per plant and grain yield. We conclude that the introduction of transgenes may alter in some way, the behavior of plants in different eco-physiological aspects in the absence of pests and weeds. | ||
| 900 | |a 134 | ||
| 900 | |a 2012 | ||
| 900 | |a ^cH | ||
| 900 | |a AAG | ||
| 900 | |a AGROVOC | ||
| 900 | |a 2012Laserna | ||
| 900 | |a AAG | ||
| 900 | |a http://ri.agro.uba.ar/files/intranet/articulo/2012Laserna.pdf | ||
| 900 | |a 2012Laserna.pdf | ||
| 900 | |a http://www.elsevier.com/ | ||
| 900 | |a http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?eid=2-s2.0-84863186886&partnerID=40&md5=64ca2911c6e9c831be14521e9dbca0e6 | ||
| 900 | |a ^a^b^c^d^e^f^g^h^i | ||
| 900 | |a OS | ||
| 942 | 0 | 0 | |c ARTICULO |2 udc |
| 942 | 0 | 0 | |c ENLINEA |2 udc |