Absorbed radiation and radiation use efficiency as affected by foliar diseases in relation to their vertical position into the canopy in wheat

The impact of foliar diseases on crop yield losses is better understood if considering ecophysiological variables together with pathological variables. Although wheat crop losses due to foliar diseases have already been studied with an ecophysiological approach, none of these studies analyzed the ve...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Otros Autores: Carretero, Ramiro, Serrago, Román Augusto, Bancal, Marie Odile, Perelló, Analía Edith, Miralles, Daniel Julio
Formato: Artículo
Lenguaje:Inglés
Materias:
Acceso en línea:http://ri.agro.uba.ar/files/intranet/articulo/2010Carretero.pdf
LINK AL EDITOR
Aporte de:Registro referencial: Solicitar el recurso aquí
LEADER 09790cab a22013337a 4500
001 AR-BaUFA000381
003 AR-BaUFA
005 20220915101515.0
008 181208t2010 |||||o|||||00||||eng d
999 |c 46815  |d 46815 
022 |a 0378-4290 
024 |a 10.1016/j.fcr.2009.12.009 
040 |a AR-BaUFA  |c AR-BaUFA 
245 1 0 |a Absorbed radiation and radiation use efficiency as affected by foliar diseases in relation to their vertical position into the canopy in wheat 
520 |a The impact of foliar diseases on crop yield losses is better understood if considering ecophysiological variables together with pathological variables. Although wheat crop losses due to foliar diseases have already been studied with an ecophysiological approach, none of these studies analyzed the vertical diseases distribution into the canopy leaf layers in relation to the canopy size [leaf area index-LAI] and its architecture [light extinction coefficient-k value]. Thus, the objectives of the present study were: [i] to understand the importance of the vertical distribution of the foliar diseases in relation to radiation absorption efficiency [RAE] for different LAI levels and canopy architectures and; [ii] to analyze and compare two ways of radiation capture estimations, considering LAI as a total or LAI of each leaf layer separately. The wheat cultivar Klein Pegaso was grown in plots under field conditions during three growing seasons using different nitrogen supply levels and a wide range of severity diseases by using protected and unprotected crops [applying or not fungicides, respectively]. Unprotected plots were inoculated with biotrophic and/or necrotrophic pathogens. Biotrophic [Puccinia triticina-leaf rust] and necrotrophic pathogens [Drechslera tritici-repentis-tan spot; Alternaria triticina-leaf blight] constituted the "diseases complex" with different levels and proportions depending on the year and N treatment. Results showed that foliar diseases reduced LAI and GLAI [green leaf area index]. GLAI was not only diminished by LAI reductions, but also by increases in NGLAI [non-green leaf area index] due to lesion coverage which reduced light absorption. In spite of the differences observed in LAI between protected and unprotected crops, radiation interception was not affected until LAI dropped down its critical value [i.e. when crop intercept 95 percent of the maximum radiation possible to be intercepted]. The results demonstrated that assuming a uniform distribution of the diseases, lead to underestimations of accumulated absorbed radiation up to 21 percent, and as a consequence to overestimations of radiation use efficiency [RUE] up to 29 percent when diseases were concentrated in the lower leaf layers into the canopy. Together with the severity of the pathogen, at the time to decide controlling diseases, farmers should take into account: [i] LAI level, mainly in those crop situations where, during the critical period for yield determination, the LAI is close to or below the critical value; [ii] canopy architecture [k] associated with light distribution into the canopy and [iii] vertical diseases distribution into the crop. 
653 0 |a CRITICAL LAI 
653 0 |a FOLIAR DISEASES 
653 0 |a LEAF LAYERS 
653 0 |a RADIATION INTERCEPTION AND ABSORPTION 
653 0 |a WHEAT [TRITICUM AESTIVUM L.] 
653 0 |a ABSORPTION 
653 0 |a CANOPY ARCHITECTURE 
653 0 |a CROP YIELD 
653 0 |a CULTIVAR 
653 0 |a DISEASE CONTROL 
653 0 |a DISEASE SEVERITY 
653 0 |a ECOPHYSIOLOGY 
653 0 |a GROWING SEASON 
653 0 |a LEAF AREA INDEX 
653 0 |a LIGHT USE EFFICIENCY 
653 0 |a WHEAT 
653 0 |a ALTERNARIA 
653 0 |a ALTERNARIA TRITICINA 
653 0 |a DRECHSLERA TRITICI-REPENTIS 
653 0 |a PUCCINIA TRITICINA 
653 0 |a TRITICUM AESTIVUM 
700 1 |9 12985  |a Carretero, Ramiro 
700 1 |9 12536  |a Serrago, Román Augusto 
700 1 |9 58095  |a Bancal, Marie Odile  
700 1 |a Perelló, Analía Edith   |9 58106 
700 1 |9 6438  |a Miralles, Daniel Julio 
773 |t Field Crops Research  |g Vol.116, no.1-2 (2010), p.184-195 
856 |u http://ri.agro.uba.ar/files/intranet/articulo/2010Carretero.pdf  |i En reservorio  |q application/pdf  |f 2010Carretero  |x MIGRADOS2018 
856 |u http://www.elsevier.com/  |x MIGRADOS2018  |z LINK AL EDITOR 
900 |a as 
900 |a 20131220 
900 |a N 
900 |a SCOPUS 
900 |a a 
900 |a s 
900 |a ARTICULO 
900 |a EN LINEA 
900 |a 03784290 
900 |a 10.1016/j.fcr.2009.12.009 
900 |a ^tAbsorbed radiation and radiation use efficiency as affected by foliar diseases in relation to their vertical position into the canopy in wheat 
900 |a ^aCarretero^bR. 
900 |a ^aSerrago^bR.A. 
900 |a ^aBancal^bM.O. 
900 |a ^aPerelló^bA.E. 
900 |a ^aMiralles^bD.J. 
900 |a ^aCarretero^bR. 
900 |a ^aSerrago^bR. A. 
900 |a ^aBancal^bM. O. 
900 |a ^aPerelló^bA. E. 
900 |a ^aMiralles^bD. J. 
900 |a ^aCarretero^bR.^tCátedra de Cerealicultura, Facultad de Agronomía, Universidad de Buenos Aires, Av. San Martin 4453, C1417DSE Buenos Aires, Argentina 
900 |a ^aSerrago^bR.A.^tIFEVA, Universidad de Buenos Aires, Av. San Martín 4453, C1417DSE Buenos Aires, Argentina 
900 |a ^aBancal^bM.O.^tCONICET, Argentina 
900 |a ^aPerelló^bA.E.^tEnvironnement et Grandes Cultures, INRA, F-78 850 Thiverval Grignon, France 
900 |a ^aMiralles^bD.J.^tCIDEFI, Universidad Nacional de La Plata, 60 and 119, 1900 La Plata, Argentina 
900 |a ^tField Crops Research^cField Crops Res. 
900 |a en 
900 |a 184 
900 |a ^i 
900 |a Vol. 116, no. 1-2 
900 |a 195 
900 |a CRITICAL LAI 
900 |a FOLIAR DISEASES 
900 |a LEAF LAYERS 
900 |a RADIATION INTERCEPTION AND ABSORPTION 
900 |a WHEAT [TRITICUM AESTIVUM L.] 
900 |a ABSORPTION 
900 |a CANOPY ARCHITECTURE 
900 |a CROP YIELD 
900 |a CULTIVAR 
900 |a DISEASE CONTROL 
900 |a DISEASE SEVERITY 
900 |a ECOPHYSIOLOGY 
900 |a GROWING SEASON 
900 |a LEAF AREA INDEX 
900 |a LIGHT USE EFFICIENCY 
900 |a WHEAT 
900 |a ALTERNARIA 
900 |a ALTERNARIA TRITICINA 
900 |a DRECHSLERA TRITICI-REPENTIS 
900 |a PUCCINIA TRITICINA 
900 |a TRITICUM AESTIVUM 
900 |a The impact of foliar diseases on crop yield losses is better understood if considering ecophysiological variables together with pathological variables. Although wheat crop losses due to foliar diseases have already been studied with an ecophysiological approach, none of these studies analyzed the vertical diseases distribution into the canopy leaf layers in relation to the canopy size [leaf area index-LAI] and its architecture [light extinction coefficient-k value]. Thus, the objectives of the present study were: [i] to understand the importance of the vertical distribution of the foliar diseases in relation to radiation absorption efficiency [RAE] for different LAI levels and canopy architectures and; [ii] to analyze and compare two ways of radiation capture estimations, considering LAI as a total or LAI of each leaf layer separately. The wheat cultivar Klein Pegaso was grown in plots under field conditions during three growing seasons using different nitrogen supply levels and a wide range of severity diseases by using protected and unprotected crops [applying or not fungicides, respectively]. Unprotected plots were inoculated with biotrophic and/or necrotrophic pathogens. Biotrophic [Puccinia triticina-leaf rust] and necrotrophic pathogens [Drechslera tritici-repentis-tan spot; Alternaria triticina-leaf blight] constituted the "diseases complex" with different levels and proportions depending on the year and N treatment. Results showed that foliar diseases reduced LAI and GLAI [green leaf area index]. GLAI was not only diminished by LAI reductions, but also by increases in NGLAI [non-green leaf area index] due to lesion coverage which reduced light absorption. In spite of the differences observed in LAI between protected and unprotected crops, radiation interception was not affected until LAI dropped down its critical value [i.e. when crop intercept 95 percent of the maximum radiation possible to be intercepted]. The results demonstrated that assuming a uniform distribution of the diseases, lead to underestimations of accumulated absorbed radiation up to 21 percent, and as a consequence to overestimations of radiation use efficiency [RUE] up to 29 percent when diseases were concentrated in the lower leaf layers into the canopy. Together with the severity of the pathogen, at the time to decide controlling diseases, farmers should take into account: [i] LAI level, mainly in those crop situations where, during the critical period for yield determination, the LAI is close to or below the critical value; [ii] canopy architecture [k] associated with light distribution into the canopy and [iii] vertical diseases distribution into the crop. 
900 |a 116 
900 |a 1-2 
900 |a 2010 
900 |a ^cH 
900 |a AAG 
900 |a AGROVOC 
900 |a 2010Carretero 
900 |a AAG 
900 |a http://ri.agro.uba.ar/files/intranet/articulo/2010Carretero.pdf 
900 |a 2010Carretero.pdf 
900 |a http://www.elsevier.com/ 
900 |a http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?eid=2-s2.0-75249105020&partnerID=40&md5=57da27005c4dc1f897ea1d603a8c4da5 
900 |a ^a^b^c^d^e^f^g^h^i 
900 |a OS 
942 0 0 |c ARTICULO  |2 udc 
942 0 0 |c ENLINEA  |2 udc