Runoff estimation in small rural watersheds using DEMS in North West of Argentina

Basic information from analytical-descriptive methodologies on the relief of watersheds provides the necessary physical parameters for studying natural resources for, e.g., integrated management of watersheds, environmental impact, soil degradation, deforestation, conservation of water resources, an...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Otros Autores: Rosatto, Héctor Gustavo, Tolón Becerra, Alfredo, Botta, Guido Fernando, Presutti, Miriam Elisabeth
Formato: Artículo
Lenguaje:Inglés
Materias:
GIS
Acceso en línea:http://ri.agro.uba.ar/files/intranet/articulo/2011Rosatto2.pdf
LINK AL EDITOR
Aporte de:Registro referencial: Solicitar el recurso aquí
LEADER 09232nab a22018377a 4500
001 AR-BaUFA000245
003 AR-BaUFA
005 20220218160612.0
008 181208t2011 |||||o|||||00||||eng d
999 |c 46679  |d 46679 
022 |a 0167-1987 
024 |a 10.1016/j.still.2010.10.010 
040 |a AR-BaUFA  |c AR-BaUFA 
245 1 0 |a Runoff estimation in small rural watersheds using DEMS in North West of Argentina 
520 |a Basic information from analytical-descriptive methodologies on the relief of watersheds provides the necessary physical parameters for studying natural resources for, e.g., integrated management of watersheds, environmental impact, soil degradation, deforestation, conservation of water resources, and so forth. Geographic information systems can be used for all of these processes, which are linked to a strong spatial component. Digital elevation models [DEM] and their derivatives are a relevant component of these data sources. The parameters found from these models, such as the slope, are used directly or indirectly [as a component of these factors] in many surface runoff estimation equations. In Latin America, the Rational Method has been and continues to be one of the most widely used for the study of microdrainage in small watersheds. The experiment was conducted in the Yatasto district of the Province of Salta, North West Argentina and has an approximate surface of 270 hectares. This zone is located on the piedmont plain of the Metán sierra, where crops are grown, with relatively high slopes and high potential of soil erosion. In this area were studied five small rural watersheds all of them within the total DEM study area and none of them over 81 hectares. This work studied whether potential surface runoff found from the Rational Method [RAMSER] in small rural watersheds shows significant differences depending on whether the mean slopes are found from the DEM derived model or by the usual field methodology. We found that the small-sized grids increase the average slope [between 045 percent and 0.79 percent] found over those found from field data. The differences observed in volume of the peak runoff [between 0.003m3s-1 and 0.062m3s-1] were not significant. The results assure that there are no differences in the parameter evaluated [average slope] under the studied methodology and conditions. 
653 0 |a AVERAGE SLOPE 
653 0 |a BASIS 
653 0 |a LEVEL 
653 0 |a TOPOGRAPHIC PARAMETERS 
653 0 |a DATA SOURCE 
653 0 |a DIGITAL ELEVATION MODEL 
653 0 |a FIELD DATA 
653 0 |a HIGH POTENTIAL 
653 0 |a HIGH SLOPES 
653 0 |a INTEGRATED MANAGEMENT 
653 0 |a LATIN AMERICA 
653 0 |a PHYSICAL PARAMETERS 
653 0 |a POTENTIAL SURFACES 
653 0 |a RATIONAL METHODS 
653 0 |a RELEVANT COMPONENTS 
653 0 |a RUNOFF ESTIMATION 
653 0 |a RURAL WATERSHEDS 
653 0 |a SMALL WATERSHEDS 
653 0 |a SOIL DEGRADATION 
653 0 |a SOIL EROSION 
653 0 |a STUDY AREAS 
653 0 |a SURFACE RUNOFFS 
653 0 |a TOPOGRAPHIC PARAMETERS 
653 0 |a DEFORESTATION 
653 0 |a ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT 
653 0 |a GEOGRAPHIC INFORMATION SYSTEMS 
653 0 |a NATURAL RESOURCES MANAGEMENT 
653 0 |a RUNOFF 
653 0 |a SOIL CONSERVATION 
653 0 |a SOILS 
653 0 |a SURVEYING 
653 0 |a WATER CONSERVATION 
653 0 |a WATER RESOURCES 
653 0 |a WATERSHEDS 
653 0 |a LANDFORMS 
653 0 |a DRAINAGE 
653 0 |a EXPERIMENTAL STUDY 
653 0 |a GIS 
653 0 |a PHYSICAL PROPERTY 
653 0 |a PIEDMONT 
653 0 |a RURAL AREA 
653 0 |a SOIL EROSION 
653 0 |a TOPOGRAPHY 
653 0 |a ARGENTINA 
700 1 |9 42921  |a Rosatto, Héctor Gustavo 
700 1 |9 48401  |a Tolón Becerra, Alfredo 
700 1 |9 26142  |a Botta, Guido Fernando 
700 1 |9 46561  |a Presutti, Miriam Elisabeth 
773 |t Soil and Tillage Research  |g Vol.112, no.1 (2011), p.8-17 
856 |u http://ri.agro.uba.ar/files/intranet/articulo/2011Rosatto2.pdf  |i En reservorio  |q application/pdf  |f 2011Rosatto2  |x MIGRADOS2018 
856 |u http://www.elsevier.com/  |x MIGRADOS2018  |z LINK AL EDITOR 
900 |a as 
900 |a 20131220 
900 |a N 
900 |a SCOPUS 
900 |a a 
900 |a s 
900 |a ARTICULO 
900 |a EN LINEA 
900 |a 01671987 
900 |a 10.1016/j.still.2010.10.010 
900 |a ^tRunoff estimation in small rural watersheds using DEMS in North West of Argentina 
900 |a ^aRosatto^bH.G. 
900 |a ^aTolón Becerra^bA. 
900 |a ^aBotta^bG. 
900 |a ^aPresutti^bM.E. 
900 |a ^aRosatto^bH. G. 
900 |a ^aTolón Becerra^bA. 
900 |a ^aBotta^bG. F. 
900 |a ^aPresutti^bM. E. 
900 |a ^aRosatto^bH.G.^tUniversity of Buenos Aires, Agronomy Faculty, Av. San Martín 4453, Buenos Aires, Argentina 
900 |a ^aTolon-Becerra^bA.^tUniversity of Almería, Ctra Sacramento s/n, La Cañada de San Urbano 04120, Almería, Spain 
900 |a ^aBotta^bG.^tNational University of La Plata, Agronomy Faculty, 1900, La Plata, Argentina 
900 |a ^aPresutti^bM.E. 
900 |a ^tSoil and Tillage Research^cSoil Tillage Res. 
900 |a en 
900 |a 8 
900 |a ^i 
900 |a Vol. 112, no. 1 
900 |a 17 
900 |a AVERAGE SLOPE 
900 |a BASIS 
900 |a LEVEL 
900 |a TOPOGRAPHIC PARAMETERS 
900 |a DATA SOURCE 
900 |a DIGITAL ELEVATION MODEL 
900 |a FIELD DATA 
900 |a HIGH POTENTIAL 
900 |a HIGH SLOPES 
900 |a INTEGRATED MANAGEMENT 
900 |a LATIN AMERICA 
900 |a PHYSICAL PARAMETERS 
900 |a POTENTIAL SURFACES 
900 |a RATIONAL METHODS 
900 |a RELEVANT COMPONENTS 
900 |a RUNOFF ESTIMATION 
900 |a RURAL WATERSHEDS 
900 |a SMALL WATERSHEDS 
900 |a SOIL DEGRADATION 
900 |a SOIL EROSION 
900 |a STUDY AREAS 
900 |a SURFACE RUNOFFS 
900 |a TOPOGRAPHIC PARAMETERS 
900 |a DEFORESTATION 
900 |a ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT 
900 |a GEOGRAPHIC INFORMATION SYSTEMS 
900 |a NATURAL RESOURCES MANAGEMENT 
900 |a RUNOFF 
900 |a SOIL CONSERVATION 
900 |a SOILS 
900 |a SURVEYING 
900 |a WATER CONSERVATION 
900 |a WATER RESOURCES 
900 |a WATERSHEDS 
900 |a LANDFORMS 
900 |a DRAINAGE 
900 |a EXPERIMENTAL STUDY 
900 |a GIS 
900 |a PHYSICAL PROPERTY 
900 |a PIEDMONT 
900 |a RURAL AREA 
900 |a SOIL EROSION 
900 |a TOPOGRAPHY 
900 |a ARGENTINA 
900 |a Basic information from analytical-descriptive methodologies on the relief of watersheds provides the necessary physical parameters for studying natural resources for, e.g., integrated management of watersheds, environmental impact, soil degradation, deforestation, conservation of water resources, and so forth. Geographic information systems can be used for all of these processes, which are linked to a strong spatial component. Digital elevation models [DEM] and their derivatives are a relevant component of these data sources. The parameters found from these models, such as the slope, are used directly or indirectly [as a component of these factors] in many surface runoff estimation equations. In Latin America, the Rational Method has been and continues to be one of the most widely used for the study of microdrainage in small watersheds. The experiment was conducted in the Yatasto district of the Province of Salta, North West Argentina and has an approximate surface of 270 hectares. This zone is located on the piedmont plain of the Metán sierra, where crops are grown, with relatively high slopes and high potential of soil erosion. In this area were studied five small rural watersheds all of them within the total DEM study area and none of them over 81 hectares. This work studied whether potential surface runoff found from the Rational Method [RAMSER] in small rural watersheds shows significant differences depending on whether the mean slopes are found from the DEM derived model or by the usual field methodology. We found that the small-sized grids increase the average slope [between 045 percent and 0.79 percent] found over those found from field data. The differences observed in volume of the peak runoff [between 0.003m3s-1 and 0.062m3s-1] were not significant. The results assure that there are no differences in the parameter evaluated [average slope] under the studied methodology and conditions. 
900 |a 112 
900 |a 1 
900 |a 2011 
900 |a ^cH 
900 |a AAG 
900 |a AGROVOC 
900 |a 2011Rosatto2 
900 |a AAG 
900 |a http://ri.agro.uba.ar/files/intranet/articulo/2011Rosatto2.pdf 
900 |a 2011Rosatto2.pdf 
900 |a http://www.elsevier.com/ 
900 |a http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?eid=2-s2.0-78751585125&partnerID=40&md5=837b5dbdcd301bac2e4967105a94fa89 
900 |a ^a^b^c^d^e^f^g^h^i 
900 |a OS 
942 0 0 |c ARTICULO  |2 udc 
942 0 0 |c ENLINEA  |2 udc