Canopy stay - green and yield in non - stressed sunflower

Delayed leaf senescence during the grain filling phase, or stay green [SG], may be functional or cosmetic; the first being considered a valuable trait in breeding of many crop species. To establish whether canopy senescence patterns exhibited by two sunflower [Helianthus annuus L.] hybrids visually...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Otros Autores: Vega, Abelardo Jorge de la, Cantore, Martín A., Sposaro, Mariano Martín, Trápani, Nora, López Pereira, Mónica, Hall, Antonio Juan
Formato: Artículo
Lenguaje:Inglés
Materias:
Acceso en línea:http://ri.agro.uba.ar/files/intranet/articulo/2011DelaVega.pdf
LINK AL EDITOR
Aporte de:Registro referencial: Solicitar el recurso aquí
LEADER 10725nab a22013337a 4500
001 AR-BaUFA000216
003 AR-BaUFA
005 20220217115704.0
008 181208t2011 |||||o|||||00||||eng d
999 |c 46650  |d 46650 
022 |a 0378-4290 
024 |a 10.1016/j.fcr.2010.12.015 
040 |a AR-BaUFA  |c AR-BaUFA 
245 1 0 |a Canopy stay - green and yield in non - stressed sunflower 
520 |a Delayed leaf senescence during the grain filling phase, or stay green [SG], may be functional or cosmetic; the first being considered a valuable trait in breeding of many crop species. To establish whether canopy senescence patterns exhibited by two sunflower [Helianthus annuus L.] hybrids visually selected for slow post-anthesis canopy leaf area index [LAI] loss reflected functional, rather than cosmetic, SG, LAI dynamics and total biomass increase between anthesis and physiological maturity were followed in three separate experiments in which the putative SG hybrids were compared with standard [i.e., non stay green, NSG] hybrids exhibiting normal rates of canopy senescence under non- or minimal-water stress conditions. In two experiments, pairwise [i.e., one SG vs. one NSG] comparisons were made at two crop population densities. In the third experiment, grown at a single crop population density, four NSG hybrids were contrasted with the two SG hybrids. Canopy senescence dynamics were well described by fitted bilinear functions which discriminated between an initial, slow phase of leaf area loss and a second phase of rapid canopy senescence. No differences between hybrids in the rate of senescence during the first phase were found, but the putative SG hybrids exhibited a significantly slower rate of senescence during the second phase and a significantly higher LAI at physiological maturity [as percent of LAI at anthesis]. One NSG hybrid showed a greater rate of second-phase senescence than the remaining three hybrids in this category. Across experiments, the anthesis-physiological maturity increment in total oil-corrected biomass and radiation use efficiency [RUE] were significantly greater in the SG hybrids. Cluster analysis based on these four attributes, using data from Exp. 3, clearly discriminated between SG and NSG hybrids. Examination of specific leaf N [SLN] dynamics suggests that the lower RUE values observed in one of the NSG hybrids could be attributable to lower SLN values, but this was not the case for the remaining NSG hybrids. It is also possible that very rapid canopy LAI loss in another NSG hybrid may underlie its lower RUE. The failure of SG hybrids to translate greater post-anthesis biomass increment into grain yield across experiments was associated with their slightly shorter times to anthesis and their significantly lower biomass at anthesis. Grain number, the component of yield most strongly associated with yield, was associated with biomass at anthesis. A further contributing factor was that the duration of grain-filling tended to be shorter in SG hybrids. In the one experiment in which this variable was measured, resistance to stalk breakage was greater in the SG hybrids than the NSG one to which they were compared. We conclude that the SG observed in the hybrids with slower canopy senescence is functional and not cosmetic, and that for this to be translated into a yield advantage all hybrids need to reach anthesis at the same time and grain-filling duration also has to be the same across hybrids. Stay green is an interesting secondary trait to select for and should lead to higher and more stable yields in environments in which stem breakage [lodging] is a problem. 
653 0 |a CANOPY DYNAMICS 
653 0 |a HELIANTHUS ANNUUS L. 
653 0 |a POST-ANTHESIS BIOMASS INCREASE 
653 0 |a SPECIFIC LEAF NITROGEN 
653 0 |a STAY GREEN 
653 0 |a YIELD 
653 0 |a BIOMASS 
653 0 |a BREEDING 
653 0 |a CLUSTER ANALYSIS 
653 0 |a CROP YIELD 
653 0 |a DICOTYLEDON 
653 0 |a HYBRID 
653 0 |a LEAF AREA INDEX 
653 0 |a LIGHT USE EFFICIENCY 
653 0 |a POPULATION DENSITY 
653 0 |a SENESCENCE 
653 0 |a WATER STRESS 
653 0 |a HELIANTHUS 
653 0 |a HELIANTHUS ANNUUS 
700 1 |9 8381  |a Vega, Abelardo Jorge de la 
700 1 |a Cantore, Martín A.  |9 12575 
700 1 |9 34184  |a Sposaro, Mariano Martín 
700 1 |a Trápani, Nora  |9 24421 
700 1 |9 7999  |a López Pereira, Mónica 
700 1 |9 24024  |a Hall, Antonio Juan 
773 |t Field Crops Research  |g Vol.121, no.1 (2011), p.175-185 
856 |u http://ri.agro.uba.ar/files/intranet/articulo/2011DelaVega.pdf  |i En reservorio  |q application/pdf  |f 2011DelaVega  |x MIGRADOS2018 
856 |u http://www.elsevier.com/  |x MIGRADOS2018  |z LINK AL EDITOR 
900 |a as 
900 |a 20131220 
900 |a N 
900 |a SCOPUS 
900 |a a 
900 |a s 
900 |a ARTICULO 
900 |a EN LINEA 
900 |a 03784290 
900 |a 10.1016/j.fcr.2010.12.015 
900 |a ^tCanopy stay-green and yield in non-stressed sunflower 
900 |a ^aDe la Vega^bA.J. 
900 |a ^aCantore^bM.A. 
900 |a ^aSposaro^bM.M. 
900 |a ^aTrápani^bN. 
900 |a ^aLópez Pereira^bM. 
900 |a ^aHall^bA.J. 
900 |a ^aDe la Vega^bA. J. 
900 |a ^aCantore^bM. A. 
900 |a ^aSposaro^bM. M. 
900 |a ^aTrápani^bN. 
900 |a ^aLópez Pereira^bM. 
900 |a ^aHall^bA. J. 
900 |a ^aDe la Vega^bA.J.^tAdvanta Semillas S.A.I.C., Ruta Nac. 33 Km 636, C.C. 559, 2600 Venado Tuerto, Santa Fe, Argentina 
900 |a ^aCantore^bM.A.^tDow AgroSciences Argentina S.A., Ruta 8 Km 264, 2720 Colón, Buenos Aires, Argentina 
900 |a ^aSposaro^bM.M.^tNidera S.A, C.C. 35, 6013 Baigorrita, Buenos Aires, Argentina 
900 |a ^aTrápani^bN.^tIFEVA, FAUBA/CONICET, Av. San Martín 4453, C1417DSE, Buenos Aires, Argentina 
900 |a ^aLópez Pereira^bM.^tDepto. Producción Vegetal, Facultad de Agronomía, Universidad de Buenos Aires, Av. San Martín 4453, C1417DSE, Buenos Aires, Argentina 
900 |a ^aHall^bA.J. 
900 |a ^tField Crops Research^cField Crops Res. 
900 |a en 
900 |a 175 
900 |a ^i 
900 |a Vol. 121, no. 1 
900 |a 185 
900 |a CANOPY DYNAMICS 
900 |a HELIANTHUS ANNUUS L. 
900 |a POST-ANTHESIS BIOMASS INCREASE 
900 |a SPECIFIC LEAF NITROGEN 
900 |a STAY GREEN 
900 |a YIELD 
900 |a BIOMASS 
900 |a BREEDING 
900 |a CLUSTER ANALYSIS 
900 |a CROP YIELD 
900 |a DICOTYLEDON 
900 |a HYBRID 
900 |a LEAF AREA INDEX 
900 |a LIGHT USE EFFICIENCY 
900 |a POPULATION DENSITY 
900 |a SENESCENCE 
900 |a WATER STRESS 
900 |a HELIANTHUS 
900 |a HELIANTHUS ANNUUS 
900 |a Delayed leaf senescence during the grain filling phase, or stay green [SG], may be functional or cosmetic; the first being considered a valuable trait in breeding of many crop species. To establish whether canopy senescence patterns exhibited by two sunflower [Helianthus annuus L.] hybrids visually selected for slow post-anthesis canopy leaf area index [LAI] loss reflected functional, rather than cosmetic, SG, LAI dynamics and total biomass increase between anthesis and physiological maturity were followed in three separate experiments in which the putative SG hybrids were compared with standard [i.e., non stay green, NSG] hybrids exhibiting normal rates of canopy senescence under non- or minimal-water stress conditions. In two experiments, pairwise [i.e., one SG vs. one NSG] comparisons were made at two crop population densities. In the third experiment, grown at a single crop population density, four NSG hybrids were contrasted with the two SG hybrids. Canopy senescence dynamics were well described by fitted bilinear functions which discriminated between an initial, slow phase of leaf area loss and a second phase of rapid canopy senescence. No differences between hybrids in the rate of senescence during the first phase were found, but the putative SG hybrids exhibited a significantly slower rate of senescence during the second phase and a significantly higher LAI at physiological maturity [as percent of LAI at anthesis]. One NSG hybrid showed a greater rate of second-phase senescence than the remaining three hybrids in this category. Across experiments, the anthesis-physiological maturity increment in total oil-corrected biomass and radiation use efficiency [RUE] were significantly greater in the SG hybrids. Cluster analysis based on these four attributes, using data from Exp. 3, clearly discriminated between SG and NSG hybrids. Examination of specific leaf N [SLN] dynamics suggests that the lower RUE values observed in one of the NSG hybrids could be attributable to lower SLN values, but this was not the case for the remaining NSG hybrids. It is also possible that very rapid canopy LAI loss in another NSG hybrid may underlie its lower RUE. The failure of SG hybrids to translate greater post-anthesis biomass increment into grain yield across experiments was associated with their slightly shorter times to anthesis and their significantly lower biomass at anthesis. Grain number, the component of yield most strongly associated with yield, was associated with biomass at anthesis. A further contributing factor was that the duration of grain-filling tended to be shorter in SG hybrids. In the one experiment in which this variable was measured, resistance to stalk breakage was greater in the SG hybrids than the NSG one to which they were compared. We conclude that the SG observed in the hybrids with slower canopy senescence is functional and not cosmetic, and that for this to be translated into a yield advantage all hybrids need to reach anthesis at the same time and grain-filling duration also has to be the same across hybrids. Stay green is an interesting secondary trait to select for and should lead to higher and more stable yields in environments in which stem breakage [lodging] is a problem. 
900 |a 121 
900 |a 1 
900 |a 2011 
900 |a ^cH 
900 |a AAG 
900 |a AGROVOC 
900 |a 2011DelaVega 
900 |a AAG 
900 |a http://ri.agro.uba.ar/files/intranet/articulo/2011DelaVega.pdf 
900 |a 2011DelaVega.pdf 
900 |a http://www.elsevier.com/ 
900 |a http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?eid=2-s2.0-79151483039&partnerID=40&md5=0cfe7d2b18db61ad9da8d00640a9e40d 
900 |a ^a^b^c^d^e^f^g^h^i 
900 |a OS 
942 0 0 |c ARTICULO  |2 udc 
942 0 0 |c ENLINEA  |2 udc