The ecosystem functioning dimension in conservation insights from remote sensing
An important goal of conservation biology is the maintenance of ecosystem processes. Incorporating quantitative measurements of ecosystem functions into conservation practice is important given that it provides not only proxies for biodiversity patterns, but also new tools and criteria for managemen...
Guardado en:
| Otros Autores: | , , , , , , , |
|---|---|
| Formato: | Artículo |
| Lenguaje: | Inglés |
| Materias: | |
| Acceso en línea: | http://ri.agro.uba.ar/files/intranet/articulo/2012Cabello.pdf LINK AL EDITOR |
| Aporte de: | Registro referencial: Solicitar el recurso aquí |
| LEADER | 08576cab a22013817a 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | AR-BaUFA000178 | ||
| 003 | AR-BaUFA | ||
| 005 | 20220714150408.0 | ||
| 008 | 181208t2012 |||||o|||||00||||eng d | ||
| 999 | |c 46612 |d 46612 | ||
| 022 | |a 0960-3115 | ||
| 024 | |a 10.1007/s10531-012-0370-7 | ||
| 040 | |a AR-BaUFA |c AR-BaUFA | ||
| 245 | 1 | 0 | |a The ecosystem functioning dimension in conservation |b insights from remote sensing |
| 520 | |a An important goal of conservation biology is the maintenance of ecosystem processes. Incorporating quantitative measurements of ecosystem functions into conservation practice is important given that it provides not only proxies for biodiversity patterns, but also new tools and criteria for management. In the satellite era, the translation of spectral information into ecosystem functional variables expands and complements the more traditional use of satellite imagery in conservation biology. Remote sensing scientists have generated accurate techniques to quantify ecosystem processes and properties of key importance for conservation planning such as primary production, ecosystem carbon gains, surface temperature, albedo, evapotranspiration, and precipitation use efficiency; however, these techniques are still unfamiliar to conservation biologists. In this article, we identify specific fields where a remotely-sensed characterization of ecosystem functioning may aid conservation science and practice. Such fields include the management and monitoring of species and populations of conservation concern; the assessment of ecosystem representativeness and singularity; the use of protected areas as reference sites to assess global change effects; the implementation of monitoring and warning systems to guide adaptive management; the direct evaluation of supporting ecosystem services; and the planning and monitoring of ecological restorations. The approaches presented here illustrate feasible ways to incorporate the ecosystem functioning dimension into conservation through the use of satellite-derived information. | ||
| 653 | 0 | |a CONSERVATION PLANNING | |
| 653 | 0 | |a ECOSYSTEM FUNCTIONING DESCRIPTORS | |
| 653 | 0 | |a ECOSYSTEM MONITORING | |
| 653 | 0 | |a ENVIRONMENTAL CHANGE | |
| 653 | 0 | |a PROTECTED AREAS | |
| 653 | 0 | |a RESTORATION ECOLOGY | |
| 653 | 0 | |a SPECIES-ENVIRONMENT RELATIONSHIPS | |
| 653 | 0 | |a BIODIVERSITY | |
| 653 | 0 | |a ECOSYSTEM FUNCTION | |
| 653 | 0 | |a EVAPOTRANSPIRATION | |
| 653 | 0 | |a GLOBAL CHANGE | |
| 653 | 0 | |a HABITAT CONSERVATION | |
| 653 | 0 | |a PROTECTED AREA | |
| 653 | 0 | |a REMOTE SENSING | |
| 653 | 0 | |a RESTORATION ECOLOGY | |
| 653 | 0 | |a SATELLITE IMAGERY | |
| 653 | 0 | |a SPECIES-AREA RELATIONSHIP | |
| 700 | |9 50022 |a Cabello, Javier | ||
| 700 | |9 20790 |a Fernández, Néstor Antonio | ||
| 700 | 1 | |9 47964 |a Alcaraz Segura, Domingo | |
| 700 | 1 | |9 50021 |a Oyonarte, Cecilio | |
| 700 | 1 | |9 22554 |a Piñeiro, Gervasio | |
| 700 | 1 | |9 67488 |a Altesor, Alice | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Delibes, Miguel |9 69857 | |
| 700 | 1 | |9 788 |a Paruelo, José María | |
| 773 | |t Biodiversity and Conservation |g Vol.21, no.13 (2012), p.3287-3305 | ||
| 856 | |u http://ri.agro.uba.ar/files/intranet/articulo/2012Cabello.pdf |i En reservorio |q application/pdf |f 2012Cabello |x MIGRADOS2018 | ||
| 856 | |u http://link.springer.com/ |x MIGRADOS2018 |z LINK AL EDITOR | ||
| 900 | |a as | ||
| 900 | |a 20131220 | ||
| 900 | |a N | ||
| 900 | |a SCOPUS | ||
| 900 | |a a | ||
| 900 | |a s | ||
| 900 | |a ARTICULO | ||
| 900 | |a EN LINEA | ||
| 900 | |a 09603115 | ||
| 900 | |a 10.1007/s10531-012-0370-7 | ||
| 900 | |a ^tThe ecosystem functioning dimension in conservation^sinsights from remote sensing | ||
| 900 | |a ^aCabello^bJ. | ||
| 900 | |a ^aFernández^bN. | ||
| 900 | |a ^aAlcaraz-Segura^bD. | ||
| 900 | |a ^aOyonarte^bC. | ||
| 900 | |a ^aPiñeiro^bG. | ||
| 900 | |a ^aAltesor^bA. | ||
| 900 | |a ^aDelibes^bM. | ||
| 900 | |a ^aParuelo^bJ.M. | ||
| 900 | |a ^aCabello^bJ. | ||
| 900 | |a ^aFernández^bN. | ||
| 900 | |a ^aAlcaraz Segura^bD. | ||
| 900 | |a ^aOyonarte^bC. | ||
| 900 | |a ^aPiñeiro^bG. | ||
| 900 | |a ^aAltesor^bA. | ||
| 900 | |a ^aDelibes^bM. | ||
| 900 | |a ^aParuelo^bJ. M. | ||
| 900 | |a ^aCabello^bJ.^tDepartamento BiologÃa Vegetal y EcologÃa, Centro Andaluz para la Evaluación y Seguimiento del Cambio Global, Universidad de AlmerÃa, Ctra. Sacramento s/n La Cañada de San Urbano, 04120 AlmerÃa, Spain | ||
| 900 | |a ^aFernández^bN.^tDepartment of Conservation Biology, Estación Biológica de Doñana, Spanish Council for Scientific Research-CSIC, Av. Américo Vespucio s/n, 41092 Sevilla, Spain | ||
| 900 | |a ^aAlcaraz-Segura^bD.^tEnvironmental Sciences Department, University of Virginia, 291 McCormick Road, Charlottesville, VA 22904, United States | ||
| 900 | |a ^aOyonarte^bC.^tDepartamento de Botánica. Facultad de Ciencias, Campus Universitario de Fuentenueva, Universidad de Granada, 18071 Granada, Spain | ||
| 900 | |a ^aPiñeiro^bG.^tLaboratorio de Análisis Regional y Teledetección, IFEVA-Facultad de AgronomÃa, Universidad de Buenos Aires y CONICET, Av. San MartÃn, 4453, 1417 Buenos Aires, Argentina | ||
| 900 | |a ^aAltesor^bA.^tDepartamento de EdafologÃa y QuÃmica AgrÃcola, Centro Andaluz para la Evaluación y Seguimiento del Cambio Global, Universidad de AlmerÃa, Ctra. Sacramento s/n, La Cañada de San Urbano, 04120 AlmerÃa, Spain | ||
| 900 | |a ^aDelibes^bM.^tDepartamento de EcologÃa, Facultad de Ciencias, Universidad de la República, Iguá 4225, Montevideo, Uruguay | ||
| 900 | |a ^aParuelo^bJ.M. | ||
| 900 | |a ^tBiodiversity and Conservation^cBiodiversity Conserv. | ||
| 900 | |a en | ||
| 900 | |a 3287 | ||
| 900 | |a ^i | ||
| 900 | |a Vol. 21, no. 13 | ||
| 900 | |a 3305 | ||
| 900 | |a CONSERVATION PLANNING | ||
| 900 | |a ECOSYSTEM FUNCTIONING DESCRIPTORS | ||
| 900 | |a ECOSYSTEM MONITORING | ||
| 900 | |a ENVIRONMENTAL CHANGE | ||
| 900 | |a PROTECTED AREAS | ||
| 900 | |a RESTORATION ECOLOGY | ||
| 900 | |a SPECIES-ENVIRONMENT RELATIONSHIPS | ||
| 900 | |a BIODIVERSITY | ||
| 900 | |a ECOSYSTEM FUNCTION | ||
| 900 | |a EVAPOTRANSPIRATION | ||
| 900 | |a GLOBAL CHANGE | ||
| 900 | |a HABITAT CONSERVATION | ||
| 900 | |a PROTECTED AREA | ||
| 900 | |a REMOTE SENSING | ||
| 900 | |a RESTORATION ECOLOGY | ||
| 900 | |a SATELLITE IMAGERY | ||
| 900 | |a SPECIES-AREA RELATIONSHIP | ||
| 900 | |a An important goal of conservation biology is the maintenance of ecosystem processes. Incorporating quantitative measurements of ecosystem functions into conservation practice is important given that it provides not only proxies for biodiversity patterns, but also new tools and criteria for management. In the satellite era, the translation of spectral information into ecosystem functional variables expands and complements the more traditional use of satellite imagery in conservation biology. Remote sensing scientists have generated accurate techniques to quantify ecosystem processes and properties of key importance for conservation planning such as primary production, ecosystem carbon gains, surface temperature, albedo, evapotranspiration, and precipitation use efficiency; however, these techniques are still unfamiliar to conservation biologists. In this article, we identify specific fields where a remotely-sensed characterization of ecosystem functioning may aid conservation science and practice. Such fields include the management and monitoring of species and populations of conservation concern; the assessment of ecosystem representativeness and singularity; the use of protected areas as reference sites to assess global change effects; the implementation of monitoring and warning systems to guide adaptive management; the direct evaluation of supporting ecosystem services; and the planning and monitoring of ecological restorations. The approaches presented here illustrate feasible ways to incorporate the ecosystem functioning dimension into conservation through the use of satellite-derived information. | ||
| 900 | |a 21 | ||
| 900 | |a 13 | ||
| 900 | |a 2012 | ||
| 900 | |a ^cH | ||
| 900 | |a AAG | ||
| 900 | |a AGROVOC | ||
| 900 | |a 2012Cabello | ||
| 900 | |a AAG | ||
| 900 | |a http://ri.agro.uba.ar/files/intranet/articulo/2012Cabello.pdf | ||
| 900 | |a 2012Cabello.pdf | ||
| 900 | |a http://link.springer.com/ | ||
| 900 | |a http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?eid=2-s2.0-84868588753&partnerID=40&md5=7d946bc960823a3e1ab768c1c1e529ae | ||
| 900 | |a ^a^b^c^d^e^f^g^h^i | ||
| 900 | |a OS | ||
| 942 | 0 | 0 | |c ARTICULO |2 udc |
| 942 | 0 | 0 | |c ENLINEA |2 udc |