Pedotransfer functions to estimate Proctor test parameters under different tillage systems

The Proctor test is time-consuming and requires sampling of several kilograms of soil. Proctor test parameters were predicted in Mollisols, Entisols and Vertisols of the Pampean region of Argentina under different management systems. They were estimated from a minimum number of readily available soi...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Otros Autores: Alvarez, Carina Rosa, Micucci, Federico Guillermo, Bustingorri, Carolina, Taboada, Miguel Angel
Formato: Artículo
Lenguaje:Inglés
Materias:
Acceso en línea:http://ri.agro.uba.ar/files/download/articulo/2010Alvarez.pdf
LINK AL EDITOR
Aporte de:Registro referencial: Solicitar el recurso aquí
LEADER 05573cab a22008777a 4500
001 AR-BaUFA000164
003 AR-BaUFA
005 20220920131048.0
008 181208t2010 |||||o|||||00||||eng d
999 |c 46598  |d 46598 
022 |a 0100-0683 
024 |a 10.1590/S0100-06832010000600002 
040 |a AR-BaUFA  |c AR-BaUFA 
245 1 0 |a Pedotransfer functions to estimate Proctor test parameters under different tillage systems 
246 0 0 |a Funções de pedotransferência para estimar parâmetros da prova de Proctor sob diferentes sistemas de preparo de solo 
520 |a The Proctor test is time-consuming and requires sampling of several kilograms of soil. Proctor test parameters were predicted in Mollisols, Entisols and Vertisols of the Pampean region of Argentina under different management systems. They were estimated from a minimum number of readily available soil properties [soil texture, total organic C] and management [training data set; n = 73]. The results were used to generate a soil compaction susceptibility model, which was subsequently validated using a second group of independent data [test data set; n = 24]. Soil maximum bulk density was estimated as follows: Maximum bulk density [Mg m-3] = 1.4756 - 0.00599 total organic C [g kg-1] + 0.0000275 sand [g kg-1] + 0.0539 management. Management was equal to 0 for uncropped and untilled soils and 1 for conventionally tilled soils. The established models predicted the Proctor test parameters reasonably well, based on readily available soil properties. Tillage systems induced changes in the maximum bulk density regardless of total organic matter content or soil texture. The lower maximum apparent bulk density values under no-tillage require a revision of the relative compaction thresholds for different no-tillage crops. 
653 0 |a SOIL COMPACTION 
653 0 |a SOIL ORGANIC CARBON 
653 0 |a SOIL TEXTURE 
700 1 |9 7471  |a Alvarez, Carina Rosa 
700 1 |a Micucci, Federico Guillermo  |9 9708 
700 1 |9 22246  |a Bustingorri, Carolina 
700 1 |9 9839  |a Taboada, Miguel Angel 
773 |t Revista Brasileira de Ciencia do Solo  |g Vol.34, no.6 (2010), p.1787-1793 
856 |u http://ri.agro.uba.ar/files/download/articulo/2010Alvarez.pdf  |i En internet  |q application/pdf  |f 2010Alvarez  |x MIGRADOS2018 
856 |u http://www.sbcs.org.br/  |x MIGRADOS2018  |z LINK AL EDITOR 
900 |a as 
900 |a 20131220 
900 |a N 
900 |a SCOPUS 
900 |a a 
900 |a s 
900 |a ARTICULO 
900 |a EN LINEA 
900 |a 01000683 
900 |a 10.1590/S0100-06832010000600002 
900 |a ^tPedotransfer functions to estimate Proctor test parameters under different tillage systems 
900 |a ^tFunções de pedotransferência para estimar parâmetros da prova de Proctor sob diferentes sistemas de preparo de solo 
900 |a ^aAlvarez^bC.R. 
900 |a ^aMicucci^bF.G. 
900 |a ^aBustingorri^bC. 
900 |a ^aTaboada^bM.A. 
900 |a ^aAlvarez^bC. R. 
900 |a ^aMicucci^bF. G. 
900 |a ^aBustingorri^bC. 
900 |a ^aTaboada^bM. A. 
900 |a ^aÃ_lvarez^bC.R.^tFacultad de Agronomía, Universidad de Buenos Aires, Av. San Martín 4453, C1417DSE; Ciudad Autónoma de Buenos Aires, Argentina 
900 |a ^aMicucci^bF.G.^tMerk Crop Bioscience Argentina S.A, Argentina 
900 |a ^aBustingorri^bC.^tInstituto de Suelos, INTA, Castelar, CONICET, Argentina 
900 |a ^aTaboada^bM.A. 
900 |a ^tRevista Brasileira de Ciencia do Solo^cRev. Bras. Cienc. Solo 
900 |a en 
900 |a 1787 
900 |a ^i 
900 |a Vol. 34, no. 6 
900 |a 1793 
900 |a SOIL COMPACTION 
900 |a SOIL ORGANIC CARBON 
900 |a SOIL TEXTURE 
900 |a The Proctor test is time-consuming and requires sampling of several kilograms of soil. Proctor test parameters were predicted in Mollisols, Entisols and Vertisols of the Pampean region of Argentina under different management systems. They were estimated from a minimum number of readily available soil properties [soil texture, total organic C] and management [training data set; n = 73]. The results were used to generate a soil compaction susceptibility model, which was subsequently validated using a second group of independent data [test data set; n = 24]. Soil maximum bulk density was estimated as follows: Maximum bulk density [Mg m-3] = 1.4756 - 0.00599 total organic C [g kg-1] + 0.0000275 sand [g kg-1] + 0.0539 management. Management was equal to 0 for uncropped and untilled soils and 1 for conventionally tilled soils. The established models predicted the Proctor test parameters reasonably well, based on readily available soil properties. Tillage systems induced changes in the maximum bulk density regardless of total organic matter content or soil texture. The lower maximum apparent bulk density values under no-tillage require a revision of the relative compaction thresholds for different no-tillage crops. 
900 |a 34 
900 |a 6 
900 |a 2010 
900 |a ^cH 
900 |a AAG 
900 |a AGROVOC 
900 |a 2010Alvarez 
900 |a AAG 
900 |a http://ri.agro.uba.ar/files/download/articulo/2010Alvarez.pdf 
900 |a 2010Alvarez.pdf 
900 |a http://www.sbcs.org.br/ 
900 |a http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?eid=2-s2.0-79951710361&partnerID=40&md5=4e377d6a67bc41ad23a1db67a9c1274c 
900 |a ^a^b^c^d^e^f^g^h^i 
900 |a OS 
942 0 0 |c ARTICULO  |2 udc 
942 0 0 |c ENLINEA  |2 udc