Heat stress in temperate and tropical maize hybrids differences in crop growth, biomass partitioning and reserves use

Maize [Zea mays L.] hybrids with tropical genetic background are a promising source of heat stress tolerance, but their performance in high yielding environments remains poorly understood. Our objective was to assess [i] genotypic differences in the ecophysiological determinants of grain yield; i.e....

Descripción completa

Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autor principal: Rattalino Edreira, Juan Ignacio
Otros Autores: Otegui, María Elena
Formato: Artículo
Lenguaje:Inglés
Materias:
Acceso en línea:http://ri.agro.uba.ar/files/intranet/articulo/2012RattalinoEdreira.pdf
LINK AL EDITOR
Aporte de:Registro referencial: Solicitar el recurso aquí
LEADER 07853cab a22010817a 4500
001 AR-BaUFA000118
003 AR-BaUFA
005 20220309113209.0
008 181208t2012 |||||o|||||00||||eng d
999 |c 46552  |d 46552 
022 |a 0378-4290 
024 |a 10.1016/j.fcr.2012.02.009 
040 |a AR-BaUFA  |c AR-BaUFA 
100 1 |9 34831  |a Rattalino Edreira, Juan Ignacio 
245 0 0 |a Heat stress in temperate and tropical maize hybrids   |b differences in crop growth, biomass partitioning and reserves use 
520 |a Maize [Zea mays L.] hybrids with tropical genetic background are a promising source of heat stress tolerance, but their performance in high yielding environments remains poorly understood. Our objective was to assess [i] genotypic differences in the ecophysiological determinants of grain yield; i.e., fraction of light intercepted by crop [fIPAR], radiation use efficiency for biomass production [RUE], and harvest index [HI], and [ii] the responses of mentioned traits to brief episodes of high temperature. The contribution of stored reserves to grain yield was also analyzed. Field experiments included three contrasting maize hybrids [Te: temperate; Tr: tropical; TeTr: Te×Tr] grown under two temperature regimes [control and heated] during daytime hours. We tested heating [ca. 33-40°C at ear level] along three 15-d periods [GS 1: pre-silking; GS 2: from silking onwards: GS 3: active grain filling]. Heat stress had no effect on leaf area and fIPAR, but heating during grain filling affected light capture through reduced cycle duration, especially for the Te hybrid [average of -16.5 d]. Heating caused a large reduction in RUE, but this trait had a rapid recovery after heat removal and final shoot biomass was not much affected [between -3 percent and -33 percent]. HI was markedly reduced by heating and its variation was associated with changes in reserves use [r 2=0.61]. Grain yield in heated plots was better explained [r 2 greater than or equal to 0.92] by the variation in HI than by the variation in final shoot biomass [r 2 greater than or equal to 0.59]. Heat effects on grain yield were larger [i] when they occurred around flowering [-527gm -2 for GS 1 and -545gm -2 for GS 2] than during grain filling [-352gm -2 for GS 3], and [ii] for the Te hybrid [-599gm -2] than for the TeTr [-440gm -2] and the Tr hybrids [-384gm -2]. Heating around silking [GS 1 and GS 2] caused apparent accumulation of reserves during the effective grain-filling period. The opposite trend was detected among plots heated during active grain formation [GS 3]. The tropical genetic background did not penalize yield potential and conferred an enhanced capacity for enduring heat effects. 
653 0 |a BIOMASS PRODUCTION 
653 0 |a GRAIN YIELD 
653 0 |a HEAT EFFECTS 
653 0 |a HYBRIDS 
653 0 |a MAIZE 
653 0 |a ZEA MAYS L. 
653 0 |a BIOMASS ALLOCATION 
653 0 |a CROP PRODUCTION 
653 0 |a CROP YIELD 
653 0 |a ECOPHYSIOLOGY 
653 0 |a GROWTH RATE 
653 0 |a HIGH TEMPERATURE 
653 0 |a LEAF AREA 
653 0 |a TEMPERATE ENVIRONMENT 
653 0 |a TEMPERATURE TOLERANCE 
653 0 |a TROPICAL ENVIRONMENT 
653 0 |a ZEA MAYS 
700 1 |9 5930  |a Otegui, María Elena 
773 |t Field Crops Research  |g Vol.130 (2012), p.87-98 
856 |u http://ri.agro.uba.ar/files/intranet/articulo/2012RattalinoEdreira.pdf  |i En reservorio  |q application/pdf  |f 2012RattalinoEdreira  |x MIGRADOS2018 
856 |u http://www.elsevier.com/  |x MIGRADOS2018  |z LINK AL EDITOR 
900 |a as 
900 |a 20131220 
900 |a N 
900 |a SCOPUS 
900 |a a 
900 |a s 
900 |a ARTICULO 
900 |a EN LINEA 
900 |a 03784290 
900 |a 10.1016/j.fcr.2012.02.009 
900 |a ^tHeat stress in temperate and tropical maize hybrids^sdifferences in crop growth, biomass partitioning and reserves use 
900 |a ^aRattalino Edreira^bJ.I. 
900 |a ^aOtegui^bM.E. 
900 |a ^aRattalino Edreira^bJ. I. 
900 |a ^aOtegui^bM. E. 
900 |a ^aRattalino Edreira^bJ.I.^tInstituto de Fisiología y Ecología Vinculado a la Agricultura del Consejo, Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Tecnológicas [IFEVA-CONICET], Facultad de Agronomía Universidad de Buenos Aires [FAUBA], Av. San Martín 4453, Buenos Aires, Argentina 
900 |a ^aOtegui^bM.E. 
900 |a ^tField Crops Research^cField Crops Res. 
900 |a en 
900 |a 87 
900 |a ^i 
900 |a Vol. 130 
900 |a 98 
900 |a BIOMASS PRODUCTION 
900 |a GRAIN YIELD 
900 |a HEAT EFFECTS 
900 |a HYBRIDS 
900 |a MAIZE 
900 |a ZEA MAYS L. 
900 |a BIOMASS ALLOCATION 
900 |a CROP PRODUCTION 
900 |a CROP YIELD 
900 |a ECOPHYSIOLOGY 
900 |a GROWTH RATE 
900 |a HIGH TEMPERATURE 
900 |a LEAF AREA 
900 |a TEMPERATE ENVIRONMENT 
900 |a TEMPERATURE TOLERANCE 
900 |a TROPICAL ENVIRONMENT 
900 |a ZEA MAYS 
900 |a Maize [Zea mays L.] hybrids with tropical genetic background are a promising source of heat stress tolerance, but their performance in high yielding environments remains poorly understood. Our objective was to assess [i] genotypic differences in the ecophysiological determinants of grain yield; i.e., fraction of light intercepted by crop [fIPAR], radiation use efficiency for biomass production [RUE], and harvest index [HI], and [ii] the responses of mentioned traits to brief episodes of high temperature. The contribution of stored reserves to grain yield was also analyzed. Field experiments included three contrasting maize hybrids [Te: temperate; Tr: tropical; TeTr: Te×Tr] grown under two temperature regimes [control and heated] during daytime hours. We tested heating [ca. 33-40°C at ear level] along three 15-d periods [GS 1: pre-silking; GS 2: from silking onwards: GS 3: active grain filling]. Heat stress had no effect on leaf area and fIPAR, but heating during grain filling affected light capture through reduced cycle duration, especially for the Te hybrid [average of -16.5 d]. Heating caused a large reduction in RUE, but this trait had a rapid recovery after heat removal and final shoot biomass was not much affected [between -3 percent and -33 percent]. HI was markedly reduced by heating and its variation was associated with changes in reserves use [r 2=0.61]. Grain yield in heated plots was better explained [r 2 greater than or equal to 0.92] by the variation in HI than by the variation in final shoot biomass [r 2 greater than or equal to 0.59]. Heat effects on grain yield were larger [i] when they occurred around flowering [-527gm -2 for GS 1 and -545gm -2 for GS 2] than during grain filling [-352gm -2 for GS 3], and [ii] for the Te hybrid [-599gm -2] than for the TeTr [-440gm -2] and the Tr hybrids [-384gm -2]. Heating around silking [GS 1 and GS 2] caused apparent accumulation of reserves during the effective grain-filling period. The opposite trend was detected among plots heated during active grain formation [GS 3]. The tropical genetic background did not penalize yield potential and conferred an enhanced capacity for enduring heat effects. 
900 |a 130 
900 |a 2012 
900 |a ^cH 
900 |a AAG 
900 |a AGROVOC 
900 |a 2012RattalinoEdreira 
900 |a AAG 
900 |a http://ri.agro.uba.ar/files/intranet/articulo/2012RattalinoEdreira.pdf 
900 |a 2012RattalinoEdreira.pdf 
900 |a http://www.elsevier.com/ 
900 |a http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?eid=2-s2.0-84858725387&partnerID=40&md5=64f7527328d6ebe8356875f0e1e6d1ab 
900 |a ^a^b^c^d^e^f^g^h^i 
900 |a OS 
942 0 0 |c ARTICULO  |2 udc 
942 0 0 |c ENLINEA  |2 udc