Implementing meta - analysis from genome - wide association studies for pork quality traits

Pork quality plays an important role in the meat processing industry. Thus, different methodologies have been implemented to elucidate the genetic architecture of traits affecting meat quality. One of the most common and widely used approaches is to perform genome-wide association (GWA) studies. How...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Otros Autores: Bernal Rubio, Yeni Liliana, Gualdrón Duarte, José Luis, Bates, R. O., Ernst, C. W., Nonneman, D., Rohrer, G. A., King, D. A., Shackelford, S. D., Wheeler, T. L., Cantet, Rodolfo Juan Carlos, Steibel, Juan Pedro
Formato: Artículo
Lenguaje:Inglés
Materias:
Acceso en línea:http://ri.agro.uba.ar/files/intranet/articulo/2015bernalrubio.pdf
LINK AL EDITOR
Aporte de:Registro referencial: Solicitar el recurso aquí
LEADER 04515nab a22005177 4500
001 20190506095731.0
003 AR-BaUFA
005 20220413095955.0
008 190506t2015 xxu|||||o|||| 00| | eng d
999 |c 46307  |d 46307 
999 |d 46307 
999 |d 46307 
999 |d 46307 
999 |d 46307 
999 |d 46307 
999 |d 46307 
999 |d 46307 
999 |d 46307 
022 |a 0021-8812 
024 |a 10.2527/jas2015-9502 
040 |a AR-BaUFA  |c AR-BaUFA 
245 1 |a Implementing meta - analysis from genome - wide association studies for pork quality traits 
520 |a Pork quality plays an important role in the meat processing industry. Thus, different methodologies have been implemented to elucidate the genetic architecture of traits affecting meat quality. One of the most common and widely used approaches is to perform genome-wide association (GWA) studies. However, a limitation of many GWA in animal breeding is the limited power due to small sample sizes in animal populations. One alternative is to implement a metaanalysis of GWA (MA-GWA) combining results from independent association studies. The objective of this study was to identify significant genomic regions associated with meat quality traits by performing MA-GWA for 8 different traits in 3 independent pig populations. Results from MA-GWA were used to search for genes possibly associated with the set of evaluated traits. Data from 3 pig data sets (U.S. Meat Animal Research Center, commercial, and Michigan State University Pig Resource Population) were used. A MA was implemented by combining z-scores derived for each SNP in every population and then weighting them using the inverse of estimated variance of SNP effects. A search for annotated genes retrieved genes previously reported as candidates for shear force (calpain-1 catalytic subunit [CAPN1] and calpastatin [CAST]), as well as for ultimate pH, purge loss, and cook loss (protein kinase, AMP-activated, γ 3 noncatalytic subunit [PRKAG3]). In addition, novel candidate genes were identified for intramuscular fat and cook loss (acyl-CoA synthetase family member 3 mitochondrial [ACSF3]) and for the objective measure of muscle redness, CIE a* (glycogen synthase 1, muscle [GYS1] and ferritin, light polypeptide [FTL]). Thus, implementation of MA GWA allowed integration of results for economically relevant traits and identified novel genes to be tested as candidates for meat quality traits in pig populations. 
650 |2 Agrovoc  |9 26 
653 |a CANDIDATE GENES 
653 |a GENOME - WIDE ASSOCIATION 
653 |a MEAT QUALITY 
653 |a META - ANALYSIS 
653 |a PIGS 
700 1 |a Bernal Rubio, Yeni Liliana  |u Universidad de Buenos Aires. Facultad de Agronomía. Departamento de Producción Animal. Buenos Aires, Argentina.  |u Michigan State University. Department of Animal Science. USA.  |9 35471 
700 1 |a Gualdrón Duarte, José Luis  |u Universidad de Buenos Aires. Facultad de Agronomía. Departamento de Producción Animal. Buenos Aires, Argentina.  |9 45707 
700 1 |a Bates, R. O.  |u Michigan State University. Department of Animal Science. USA.  |9 67472 
700 1 |a Ernst, C. W.  |u Michigan State University. Department of Animal Science. USA.  |9 67473 
700 1 |a Nonneman, D.  |u USDA/ARS. U.S. Meat Animal Research Center. Clay Center, USA.  |9 68573 
700 1 |a Rohrer, G. A.  |u USDA/ARS. U.S. Meat Animal Research Center. Clay Center, USA.  |9 68574 
700 1 |a King, D. A.  |u USDA/ARS. U.S. Meat Animal Research Center. Clay Center, USA.  |9 68603 
700 1 |a Shackelford, S. D.  |u USDA/ARS. U.S. Meat Animal Research Center. Clay Center, USA.  |9 68597 
700 1 |a Wheeler, T. L.  |u USDA/ARS. U.S. Meat Animal Research Center. Clay Center, USA.  |9 68622 
700 1 |a Cantet, Rodolfo Juan Carlos  |u Universidad de Buenos Aires. Facultad de Agronomía. Departamento de Producción Animal. Buenos Aires, Argentina.  |u CONICET. Buenos Aires, Argentina.  |9 12817 
700 1 |a Steibel, Juan Pedro  |u Michigan State University. Department of Animal Science. USA.  |u Michigan State University. Department of Fisheries and Wildlife. East Lansing. USA.  |9 13048 
773 0 |t Journal of animal science  |w (AR-BaUFA)SECS000110  |g vol.93 (2015), p.5607–5617, tbls., grafs. 
856 |f 2015bernalrubio  |i en reservorio  |q application/pdf  |u http://ri.agro.uba.ar/files/intranet/articulo/2015bernalrubio.pdf  |x ARTI201904 
856 |z LINK AL EDITOR  |u https://www.asas.org 
942 |c ARTICULO 
942 |c ENLINEA 
976 |a AAG