Strains in sustainability debates traditional ecological knowledge and western science through the lens of extension agents in a pastoral region

Those involved in sustainability debates on developmental pathways concur in the synergistic potential of integrating traditional ecological knowledge (TEK) and Western scientific approaches. Transhumant pastoralism is a livelihood strategy adapted to spatiotemporal environmental variability in many...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autor principal: Easdale, Marcos H.
Otros Autores: Pérez León, Natalia, Aguiar, Martín Roberto
Formato: Artículo
Lenguaje:Inglés
Materias:
Acceso en línea:http://ri.agro.uba.ar/files/intranet/articulo/2019easdale.pdf
LINK AL EDITOR
Aporte de:Registro referencial: Solicitar el recurso aquí
LEADER 03954nab a22003737a 4500
001 20190405141949.0
003 AR-BaUFA
005 20220926163446.0
008 190405t2019 xxud|||oo|||| 00| 0 eng d
999 |c 46222  |d 46222 
999 |d 46222 
999 |d 46222 
999 |d 46222 
999 |d 46222 
999 |d 46222 
999 |d 46222 
022 |a 1549-0831 
024 |a 10.1111/ruso.12268 
040 |a AR-BaUFA  |c AR-BaUFA 
100 1 0 |9 30509  |a Easdale, Marcos H.  |u CONICET - Centro Científico Tecnológico CONICET Patagonia Norte. Instituto de Investigaciones Forestales y Agropecuarias Bariloche (IFAB). Bariloche, Argentina.  |u Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria (INTA). Centro Regional Patagonia Norte. Estación Experimental Agropecuaria Bariloche (EEA Bariloche). San Carlos de Bariloche, Río Negro, Argentina.  |u CONICET - INTA. San Carlos de Bariloche, Río Negro, Argentina. 
245 0 0 |a Strains in sustainability debates  |b traditional ecological knowledge and western science through the lens of extension agents in a pastoral region 
520 |a Those involved in sustainability debates on developmental pathways concur in the synergistic potential of integrating traditional ecological knowledge (TEK) and Western scientific approaches. Transhumant pastoralism is a livelihood strategy adapted to spatiotemporal environmental variability in many mountainous and arid regions worldwide. This form of livelihood is based on a mobile logic that is increasingly threatened by novel lifestyles promoted from a Western mind - set and by climate change. The aim of this article is to identify and characterize the different perspectives of environmental and social issues in a pastoral region and their association with labor collaboration among extension agents, framed in an institutional action. We tackled the inquiry about viewpoints with Q methodology and related it to regional problems, alternative solutions, and future development pathways for transhumant pastoralism and landscape management in northwest Patagonia. We identified six perspectives and characterized them with their topological position in the social network. Mediating positions registered the highest network centrality of labor collaborations among agents, whereas more dominant perspectives emphasizing TEK or scientific knowledge registered intermediate centrality. There was consensus on the need for sustainable developmental options, but the emphasis on combining knowledge still needs convergent solutions. 
650 |2 Agrovoc  |9 26 
653 |a METHODOLOGY 
653 |a Q-SORT 
653 |a Q METHODOLOGY 
700 1 |a Pérez León, Natalia  |u CONICET - Centro Científico Tecnológico CONICET Patagonia Norte. Instituto de Investigaciones Forestales y Agropecuarias Bariloche (IFAB). Bariloche, Argentina.  |u Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria (INTA). Centro Regional Patagonia Norte. Estación Experimental Agropecuaria Bariloche (EEA Bariloche). San Carlos de Bariloche, Río Negro, Argentina.  |u CONICET - INTA. San Carlos de Bariloche, Río Negro, Argentina.  |9 68456 
700 1 |9 12939  |a Aguiar, Martín Roberto  |u Universidad de Buenos Aires. Facultad de Agronomía. Departamento de Recursos Naturales y Ambiente. Cátedra de Ecología. Buenos Aires, Argentina.  |u Universidad de Buenos Aires. Facultad de Agronomía. Instituto de Investigaciones Fisiológicas y Ecológicas Vinculadas a la Agricultura (IFEVA). Buenos Aires, Argentina.  |u CONICET – Universidad de Buenos Aires. Instituto de Investigaciones Fisiológicas y Ecológicas Vinculadas a la Agricultura (IFEVA). Buenos Aires, Argentina. 
773 |t Rural Sociology  |g Vol.85, no.1 (2019), p.57-84, grafs., tbls. 
856 |f 2019easdale  |i En Reservorio  |q application/pdf  |u http://ri.agro.uba.ar/files/intranet/articulo/2019easdale.pdf  |x ARTI201904 
856 |u https://www.wiley.com  |z LINK AL EDITOR 
942 |c ARTICULO 
942 |c ENLINEA 
976 |a AAG