Fruiting efficiency an alternative trait to further rise wheat yield

Further improvements in wheat yields are critical, for which increases in grain number would be required. In the recent past, higher grain number was achieved through increased growth of the juvenile spikes before anthesis, due to the r eduction in stem growth. As current cultivars have already an o...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Otros Autores: Slafer, Gustavo Ariel, Elia, Mónica, Savin, Roxana, García, Guillermo Ariel, Terrile, Ignacio Ismael, Ferrante, Ariel, Miralles, Daniel Julio, González, Fernanda Gabriela
Formato: Artículo
Lenguaje:Inglés
Materias:
Acceso en línea:http://ri.agro.uba.ar/files/download/articulo/2015slafer.pdf
LINK AL EDITOR
Aporte de:Registro referencial: Solicitar el recurso aquí
LEADER 04746nab a22004457a 4500
001 20190318151247.0
003 AR-BaUFA
005 20220915101511.0
008 190318t2015 xxud||||o|||| 00| 0 eng d
999 |c 46189  |d 46189 
999 |d 46189 
999 |d 46189 
999 |d 46189 
999 |d 46189 
022 |a 2048-3694 
024 |a 10.1002/fes3.59 
040 |a AR-BaUFA 
245 1 |a Fruiting efficiency  |b an alternative trait to further rise wheat yield 
520 |a Further improvements in wheat yields are critical, for which increases in grain number would be required. In the recent past, higher grain number was achieved through increased growth of the juvenile spikes before anthesis, due to the r eduction in stem growth. As current cultivars have already an optimum height, alternatives must be identifi ed for further increasing grain number. One of them is increasing fruiting efficiency (grains set per unit of spike dry weight at anthesis). Fruiting efficiency is the final outcome of the fate of fl oret development and differences in this trait within modern cultivars would be related to higher survival of fl oret primordia. Then there are two alternative physiological pathways to improve fruiting efficiency by allowing a normal development of most vulnerable fl oret primordia: an increased allocation of assimilates for the developing florets before anthesis, or reduced demand of the fl orets for maintaining their normal development. Both alternatives may be possible, and it might be critical to recognize which of them is the actual cause of differences in fruiting effi ciency. When considering this trait in breeding we must be aware of potential trade-o ffs and therefore it must be avoided that increases in fruiting effi ciency be constitutively related to decreases in either spike dry weight at anthesis or grain weight. In this review we described fruiting effi ciency and its physiological bases, analyzing genetic variation and considering potential drawbacks that must be taken into account to avoid increases in fruiting effi ciency being compensated by other traits. 
653 |a FLORET DEVELOPMENT 
653 |a GRAIN NUMBER 
653 |a PARTITIONING 
653 |a SPIKE DRY WEIGHT 
653 |a TRITICUM AESTIVUM 
653 |a TRITICUM DURUM 
653 |a YIELD COMPONENT 
700 1 |9 9842  |a Slafer, Gustavo Ariel  |u University of Lleida. Department of Crop and Forest Sciences and AGROTECNIO (Center for Research in Agrotechnology). Lleida, Spain.  |u Catalonian Institution for Research and Advanced Studies ( ICREA).Barcelona, Spain. 
700 1 |a Elia, Mónica  |u University of Lleida. Department of Crop and Forest Sciences and AGROTECNIO (Center for Research in Agrotechnology). Lleida, Spain.  |9 68417 
700 1 |9 6313  |a Savin, Roxana  |u University of Lleida. Department of Crop and Forest Sciences and AGROTECNIO (Center for Research in Agrotechnology). Lleida, Spain. 
700 1 |9 29116  |a García, Guillermo Ariel  |u Universidad de Buenos Aires. Facultad de Agronomía. Instituto de Investigaciones Fisiológicas y Ecológicas Vinculadas a la Agricultura (IFEVA). Buenos Aires, Argentina.  |u CONICET – Universidad de Buenos Aires. Instituto de Investigaciones Fisiológicas y Ecológicas Vinculadas a la Agricultura (IFEVA). Buenos Aires, Argentina. 
700 1 |9 31115  |a Terrile, Ignacio Ismael  |u Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria (INTA). Estación Experimental Agropecuaria Pergamino (EEA Pergamino). Buenos Aires, Argentina. 
700 1 |a Ferrante, Ariel  |u University of Queensland. Queensland Alliance for Agriculture and Food Innovation (QAAFI). Queensland, Australia.   |9 20915 
700 1 |9 6438  |a Miralles, Daniel Julio  |u CONICET – Universidad de Buenos Aires. Instituto de Investigaciones Fisiológicas y Ecológicas Vinculadas a la Agricultura (IFEVA). Buenos Aires, Argentina. 
700 1 |9 11379  |a González, Fernanda Gabriela  |u Universidad de Buenos Aires. Facultad de Agronomía. Instituto de Investigaciones Fisiológicas y Ecológicas Vinculadas a la Agricultura (IFEVA). Buenos Aires, Argentina.  |u CONICET – Universidad de Buenos Aires. Instituto de Investigaciones Fisiológicas y Ecológicas Vinculadas a la Agricultura (IFEVA). Buenos Aires, Argentina.  |u Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria (INTA). Estación Experimental Agropecuaria Pergamino (EEA Pergamino). Buenos Aires, Argentina. 
773 |g vol.4, no.2 (2015), p.92–109, grafs., tbls.  |t Food and Energy Security 
856 |f 2015slafer  |i en Internet  |q application/pdf  |u http://ri.agro.uba.ar/files/download/articulo/2015slafer.pdf  |x ARTI201904 
856 |u https://www.wiley.com  |z LINK AL EDITOR 
942 |c ARTICULO 
942 |c ENLINEA 
976 |a AAG