Discontinuities in quinoa biodiversity in the dry Andes an 18 - century perspective based on allelic genotyping

History and environment shape crop biodiversity, particularly in areas with vulnerable human communities and ecosystems. Tracing crop biodiversity over time helps understand how rural societies cope with anthropogenic or climatic changes. Exceptionally well preserved ancient DNA of quinoa (Chenopodi...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Otros Autores: Winkel, Thierry, Aguirre, María Gabriela, Arizio, Carla Marcela, Aschero, Carlos Alberto, Babot, María del Pilar, Benoit, Laure, Burgarella, Concetta, Bertero, Héctor Daniel
Formato: Artículo
Lenguaje:Inglés
Materias:
Acceso en línea:http://ri.agro.uba.ar/files/download/articulo/2018winkel.pdf
LINK AL EDITOR
Aporte de:Registro referencial: Solicitar el recurso aquí
LEADER 05157nab a22005777a 4500
001 20190212111656.0
003 AR-BaUFA
005 20230329125846.0
008 190212t2018 xxudbo||o|||| 00| | eng d
999 |c 46128  |d 46128 
999 |d 46128 
999 |d 46128 
999 |d 46128 
999 |d 46128 
999 |d 46128 
999 |d 46128 
999 |d 46128 
022 |a 1932-6203 
024 |a 10.1371/journal.pone.0207519 
040 |a AR-BaUFA  |c AR-BaUFA 
245 1 0 |a Discontinuities in quinoa biodiversity in the dry Andes  |b an 18 - century perspective based on allelic genotyping 
520 |a History and environment shape crop biodiversity, particularly in areas with vulnerable human communities and ecosystems. Tracing crop biodiversity over time helps understand how rural societies cope with anthropogenic or climatic changes. Exceptionally well preserved ancient DNA of quinoa (Chenopodium quinoa Willd.) from the cold and arid Andes of Argentina has allowed us to track changes and continuities in quinoa diversity over 18 centuries, by coupling genotyping of 157 ancient and modern seeds by 24 SSR markers with cluster and coalescence analyses. Cluster analyses revealed clear population patterns separating modern and ancient quinoas. Coalescence-based analyses revealed that genetic drift within a single population cannot explain genetic differentiation among ancient and modern quinoas. The hypothesis of a genetic bottleneck related to the Spanish Conquest also does not seem to apply at a local scale. Instead, the most likely scenario is the replacement of preexisting quinoa gene pools with new ones of lower genetic diversity. This process occurred at least twice in the last 18 centuries: first, between the 6th and 12th centuries— a time of agricultural intensification well before the Inka and Spanish conquests— and then between the 13th century and today—a period marked by farming marginalization in the late 19th century likely due to a severe multidecadal drought. While these processes of local gene pool replacement do not imply losses of genetic diversity at the metapopulation scale, they support the view that gene pool replacement linked to social and environmental changes can result from opposite agricultural trajectories. 
650 |2 Agrovoc  |9 26 
653 |a AGRICULTURAL LAND 
653 |a AGRICULTURAL WORKER 
653 |a ALLELE 
653 |a BIODIVERSITY 
653 |a BOTTLE NECK 
653 |a POPULATION 
653 |a CHENOPODIUM QUINOA 
653 |a DROUGHT 
653 |a GENETIC DRIFT 
653 |a GENETIC VARIABILITY 
653 |a GENETIC VARIATION 
653 |a GENOTYPE 
653 |a NON HUMAN 
653 |a PLANT GENE 
700 1 |a Winkel, Thierry  |u Université de Montpellier. Université Paul-Valéry Montpellier UPVM3. École Pratique des Hautes Études EPHE. Centre d’ Écologie Fonctionnelle et Évolutive CEFE. Institut de Recherche pour le Développement IRD, CNRS. Montpellier, France.  |9 68296 
700 1 |a Aguirre, María Gabriela  |u Universidad Nacional de Tucumán (FCN e IML, UNT). Facultad de Ciencias Naturales e Instituto Miguel Lillo. San Miguel de Tucumán, Argentina.  |9 68297 
700 1 |a Arizio, Carla Marcela  |u Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria (INTA). Instituto de Recursos Biológicos (CIRN). Hurlingham, Buenos Aires, Argentina.  |9 68298 
700 1 |a Aschero, Carlos Alberto  |u CONICET - Instituto Superior de Estudios Sociales (ISES). San Miguel de Tucumán, Argentina.  |u Universidad Nacional de Tucumán. Facultad de Ciencias Naturales e Instituto Miguel Lillo. Instituto de Arqueología y Museo. San Miguel de Tucumán, Argentina.  |9 68299 
700 1 |a Babot, María del Pilar  |u CONICET - Instituto Superior de Estudios Sociales (ISES). San Miguel de Tucumán, Argentina.  |u Universidad Nacional de Tucumán. Facultad de Ciencias Naturales e Instituto Miguel Lillo. Instituto de Arqueología y Museo. San Miguel de Tucumán, Argentina.  |9 68300 
700 1 |a Benoit, Laure  |u Université de Montpellier. Centre d’ Écologie Fonctionnelle et Évolutive (CEFE). CNRS. Montpellier, France.  |9 68301 
700 1 |a Burgarella, Concetta  |u UMR AGAP Amélioration Génétique et Adaptation des Plantes Méditerranéennes et Tropicales CIRAD, INRA. Montpellier, France.  |9 68302 
700 1 |9 8170  |a Bertero, Héctor Daniel  |u Universidad de Buenos Aires. Facultad de Agronomía. Departamento de Producción Vegetal. Cátedra de Producción Vegetal. Buenos Aires, Argentina.  |u Universidad de Buenos Aires. Facultad de Agronomía. Instituto de Investigaciones Fisiológicas y Ecológicas Vinculadas a la Agricultura (IFEVA). Buenos Aires, Argentina.  |u CONICET – Universidad de Buenos Aires. Instituto de Investigaciones Fisiológicas y Ecológicas Vinculadas a la Agricultura (IFEVA). Buenos Aires, Argentina. 
773 |t Plos One  |g vol.13, no.12 (2018), e0207519 13 p., mapas, grafs. 
856 |f 2018winkel  |i en internet  |q application/pdf  |u http://ri.agro.uba.ar/files/download/articulo/2018winkel.pdf  |x ARTI201902 
856 |z LINK AL EDITOR  |u https://journals.plos.org 
942 |c ARTICULO 
942 |c ENLINEA 
976 |a AAG