Physiological maturity as a function of seed and pod water concentration in spring rapeseed (Brassica napus L.)

Mostrar otras versiones (1)

Determining the optimum time for rapeseed harvest is challenging due to non-uniform seed maturity resulting from asynchronous flowering and pod dehiscence from sequential racemes. Identifying physiological maturity (PM) by visual methods is subjective and results can be affected by environmental con...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Otros Autores: Menéndez, Yesica Cristina, Botto, Javier Francisco, Gómez, Nora Valentina, Miralles, Daniel Julio, Rondanini, Déborah Paola
Formato: Artículo
Lenguaje:Inglés
Materias:
OILSEED RAPE
CANOLA
SEED GROWTH
GRAIN MOISTURE
POD SHATTERING
SWATHING
Acceso en línea:http://ri.agro.uba.ar/files/intranet/articulo/2018menendez.pdf
LINK AL EDITOR
Aporte de:Registro referencial: Solicitar el recurso aquí
Biblioteca Central (FAUBA) de Universidad de Buenos Aires
LEADER 05256nab a22004337a 4500
001 20181228141238.0
003 AR-BaUFA
005 20220915101648.0
008 181228t2019 ne |||||o|||| 00| | eng d
999 |c 46095  |d 46095 
999 |d 46095 
999 |d 46095 
999 |d 46095 
999 |d 46095 
999 |d 46095 
999 |d 46095 
999 |d 46095 
022 |a 0378-4290 
024 |a 10.1016/j.fcr.2018.11.002 
040 |a AR-BaUFA 
245 1 |a Physiological maturity as a function of seed and pod water concentration in spring rapeseed (Brassica napus L.) 
520 |a Determining the optimum time for rapeseed harvest is challenging due to non-uniform seed maturity resulting from asynchronous flowering and pod dehiscence from sequential racemes. Identifying physiological maturity (PM) by visual methods is subjective and results can be affected by environmental conditions. PM can be determined using a quantitative model based on seed water concentration (SWC) as previously demonstrated for several other crops, although not yet developed for rapeseed crop. The objective of this work was to study the relationship between the dynamics of seed dry weight and water concentration in seven spring rapeseed cultivars grown at two contrasting densities (15 and 60 pl m−2) in three experiments at one location in Buenos Aires (Argentina). We evaluated the timing of PM on the basis of SWC in seeds located in the main raceme, second and fourth floral branches. The evolution of seed fresh and dry weight was followed bi-weekly from the beginning of flowering to harvest maturity. In Exp. 1, the grain-filling duration ranged from 39 to 57 days (700–1100 °C d) and the growth of seeds from floral branches finished 3–8 days later than those from the main raceme. Seed dry weight at PM ranged from 2.4 to 2.7 and from 3.0 to 3.2 mg for Lynx and Monty cultivars, respectively, without significant effects of floral position or plant density. Bi-linear functions were used to fit the relationship between relative seed dry weight (RSDW) and SWC relationships (R2 from 0.85 to 0.95). Across cultivars and floral positions, PM was attained when seeds exhibited 46.3 ± 0.7% SWC (R2=0.90, P < 0.001, n=441). This model was validated against independent data from Exps. 2 and 3, successfully simulating the dynamics of relative seed dry weight based on fruit WC (r=0.88; P < 0.001, n=275). At PM, the water content (WC) of whole pod was about 70% and the pod shattering began after this point, when the WC of the pod dropped drastically. We conclude that under non-stressful conditions, PM in rapeseed occurs at 46% SWC. Swathing can be conducted from SWC < 46%, instead of the currently recommended 35%, advancing the harvest and leaving the land available for sowing the next crop, which would represent an advantage for double cropping in intensified agricultural systems. 
653 |a OILSEED RAPE 
653 |a CANOLA 
653 |a SEED GROWTH 
653 |a GRAIN MOISTURE 
653 |a POD SHATTERING 
653 |a SWATHING 
700 1 |9 36636  |a Menéndez, Yesica Cristina  |u Universidad de Buenos Aires. Facultad de Agronomía. Buenos Aires, Argentina.  |u Universidad de Buenos Aires. Facultad de Agronomía. Instituto de Investigaciones Fisiológicas y Ecológicas Vinculadas a la Agricultura (IFEVA). Buenos Aires, Argentina.  |u CONICET – Universidad de Buenos Aires. Instituto de Investigaciones Fisiológicas y Ecológicas Vinculadas a la Agricultura (IFEVA). Buenos Aires, Argentina. 
700 1 |9 65609  |a Botto, Javier Francisco  |u Universidad de Buenos Aires. Facultad de Agronomía. Buenos Aires, Argentina.  |u Universidad de Buenos Aires. Facultad de Agronomía. Instituto de Investigaciones Fisiológicas y Ecológicas Vinculadas a la Agricultura (IFEVA). Buenos Aires, Argentina.  |u CONICET – Universidad de Buenos Aires. Instituto de Investigaciones Fisiológicas y Ecológicas Vinculadas a la Agricultura (IFEVA). Buenos Aires, Argentina. 
700 1 |9 26701  |a Gómez, Nora Valentina  |u Universidad de Buenos Aires. Facultad de Agronomía. Buenos Aires, Argentina. 
700 1 |9 6438  |a Miralles, Daniel Julio  |u Universidad de Buenos Aires. Facultad de Agronomía. Buenos Aires, Argentina.  |u Universidad de Buenos Aires. Facultad de Agronomía. Instituto de Investigaciones Fisiológicas y Ecológicas Vinculadas a la Agricultura (IFEVA). Buenos Aires, Argentina.  |u CONICET – Universidad de Buenos Aires. Instituto de Investigaciones Fisiológicas y Ecológicas Vinculadas a la Agricultura (IFEVA). Buenos Aires, Argentina. 
700 1 |9 11330  |a Rondanini, Déborah Paola  |u Universidad de Buenos Aires. Facultad de Agronomía. Buenos Aires, Argentina.  |u CONICET. Godoy Cruz, Mendoza, Argentina.  |u Universidad Nacional de Lomas de Zamora. Instituto de Investigación sobre Producción Agropecuaria, Ambiente y Salud (IIPAAS-CIC). Llavallol, Buenos Aires, Argentina. 
773 0 |t Field crops research  |w (AR-BaUFA)SECS000083  |g vol.231 (2019), p.1-9, grafs., tbls. 
856 |f 2018menendez  |i en reservorio  |q application/pdf  |u http://ri.agro.uba.ar/files/intranet/articulo/2018menendez.pdf  |x ARTI201902 
856 |z LINK AL EDITOR  |u http://www.elsevier.com 
942 0 |c ARTICULO 
942 0 |c ENLINEA 
976 |a AAG 

Ejemplares similares