Blue light attenuation mediates morphological and architectural acclimation of Vitis vinifera cv. Malbec to shade and increases light capture

Grapevine is one of the most important fruit crops worldwide. Vineyard management practices affect light interception and spectral characteristics inside the canopy. Plant photoreceptors drive shade acclimation responses after the perception of light signals such as low photosynthetic active radiati...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Otros Autores: González, Carina Verónica, Jeréz, Damián Nicolás, Jofré, María Florencia, Guevara, Aranzazú, Prieto, Jorge A., Mazza, Carlos, Williams, Larry E., Giordano, Carla V.
Formato: Artículo
Lenguaje:Inglés
Materias:
Acceso en línea:http://ri.agro.uba.ar/files/intranet/articulo/2019gonzalez.pdf
LINK AL EDITOR
Aporte de:Registro referencial: Solicitar el recurso aquí
LEADER 05293nab a22004937a 4500
001 20181220110258.0
003 AR-BaUFA
005 20220714133747.0
008 181220t2019 ne ado||o|||| 00| | eng d
999 |c 46078  |d 46078 
999 |d 46078 
999 |d 46078 
999 |d 46078 
999 |d 46078 
999 |d 46078 
999 |d 46078 
999 |d 46078 
999 |d 46078 
022 |a 0098-8472 
024 |a 10.1016/j.envexpbot.2018.09.023 
040 |a AR-BaUFA 
245 1 0 |a Blue light attenuation mediates morphological and architectural acclimation of Vitis vinifera cv. Malbec to shade and increases light capture 
520 |a Grapevine is one of the most important fruit crops worldwide. Vineyard management practices affect light interception and spectral characteristics inside the canopy. Plant photoreceptors drive shade acclimation responses after the perception of light signals such as low photosynthetic active radiation (PAR), low blue light (BL) levels and low red-to-far red ratios (R:FR). Grapevine plants effectively acclimate to shade but are irresponsive to variations in R:FR perceived by phytochromes. To determine if BL attenuation mediate shade acclimation in this species, we manipulated sunlight reaching the plants by filtering. Vitis vinifera cv. Malbec plants were grown under low (LOW PAR) and high (HIGH PAR) neutral light environments, and under high light but attenuating the BL component of the spectrum (-BLUE). We evaluated morphological, biochemical and architectural responses to shade, and modelled light interception (LIE) and absorption (Ea) efficiencies. We found that plants grown under –BLUE mimicked morphological and architectural responses of plants cultivated under LOW PAR. In addition, LIE and Ea were higher in plants grown under –BLUE and LOW PAR than in HIGH PAR. Our findings suggest that morphological and architectural responses to shade are under the control of BL-photoreceptors in grapevine. However, BL attenuation failed to induce the accumulation of photosynthetic pigments in leaves observed under LOW PAR. Unchanged biomass accumulation across light treatments suggests that improved light capture counterbalanced irradiance reduction. These results might help in the design of practices that manipulate irradiance in the field, and that are increasingly being used as environment-friendly management tools to improve crop performance. 
653 |a GRAPEVINE 
653 |a BLUE LIGHT 
653 |a PHOTOSYNTHETIC PHOTON FLUX DENSITY 
653 |a PLANT ARCHITECTURE 
653 |a YPLANTQMC 
653 |a LIGHT ABSORPTION EFFICIENCY 
653 |a LIGHT INTERCEPTION EFFICIENCY 
700 1 |9 68220  |a González, Carina Verónica  |u Universidad Nacional de Cuyo. Instituto de Biología Agrícola de Mendoza (IBAM). Luján de Cuyo, Mendoza, Argentina.  |u CONICET - Universidad Nacional de Cuyo. Instituto de Biología Agrícola de Mendoza (IBAM). Luján de Cuyo, Mendoza, Argentina.  |u Universidad Nacional de Cuyo. Facultad de Ciencias Exactas y Naturales. Luján de Cuyo, Mendoza, Argentina. 
700 1 |9 68222  |a Jeréz, Damián Nicolás  |u Universidad Nacional de Cuyo. Facultad de Ciencias Exactas y Naturales. Mendoza, Argentina. 
700 1 |9 68223  |a Jofré, María Florencia  |u Universidad Nacional de Cuyo. Instituto de Biología Agrícola de Mendoza (IBAM). Luján de Cuyo, Mendoza, Argentina.  |u CONICET - Universidad Nacional de Cuyo. Instituto de Biología Agrícola de Mendoza (IBAM). Luján de Cuyo, Mendoza, Argentina. 
700 1 |a Guevara, Aranzazú  |u Universidad Nacional de Cuyo. Instituto de Biología Agrícola de Mendoza (IBAM). Luján de Cuyo, Mendoza, Argentina.  |u CONICET - Universidad Nacional de Cuyo. Instituto de Biología Agrícola de Mendoza (IBAM). Luján de Cuyo, Mendoza, Argentina.  |9 47409 
700 1 |9 68224  |a Prieto, Jorge A.  |u Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria (INTA). Estación Experimental Agropecuaria Mendoza. Estación Experimental Agropecuaria Mendoza (EEA Mendoza). Luján de Cuyo, Mendoza, Argentina. 
700 1 |9 12962  |a Mazza, Carlos  |u Universidad de Buenos Aires. Facultad de Agronomía. Instituto de Investigaciones Fisiológicas y Ecológicas Vinculadas a la Agricultura (IFEVA). Buenos Aires, Argentina.  |u CONICET – Universidad de Buenos Aires. Instituto de Investigaciones Fisiológicas y Ecológicas Vinculadas a la Agricultura (IFEVA). Buenos Aires, Argentina. 
700 1 |a Williams, Larry E.  |u University of California. Kearney Agricultural Research and Extension Center. Department of Viticulture and Enology. Parlier, CA, United States.  |9 41170 
700 1 |9 68225  |a Giordano, Carla V.  |u Universidad Nacional de Cuyo. Instituto Argentino de Investigaciones en Zonas Áridas (IADIZA). Luján de Cuyo, Mendoza, Argentina.  |u CONICET - Universidad Nacional de Cuyo. Instituto Argentino de Investigaciones en Zonas Áridas (IADIZA. Luján de Cuyo, Mendoza, Argentina. 
773 0 |t Environmental and experimental botany  |w SECS000526  |g vol.157 (2019) , p.112-120, tbls., grafs., il., fot. 
856 |f 2019gonzalez  |i en reservorio  |q application/pdf  |u http://ri.agro.uba.ar/files/intranet/articulo/2019gonzalez.pdf  |x ARTI201902 
856 |z LINK AL EDITOR  |u http://www.elsevier.com 
942 0 |c ARTICULO 
942 0 |c ENLINEA 
976 |a AAG