Climatic niche shift in the amphitropical disjunct grass Trichloris crinita

Plant species disjunctions have attracted the interest of ecologists for decades. We investigated Trichloris crinita, a native C4 perennial grass with disjunct distribution between subtropical regions of North and South America, testing the hypothesis that the species has a similar realized climatic...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autor principal: Quiroga, Raúl Emiliano
Otros Autores: Premoli, Andrea Cecilia, Fernández, Roberto Javier
Formato: Artículo
Lenguaje:Inglés
Materias:
Acceso en línea:http://ri.agro.uba.ar/files/download/articulo/2018quiroga.pdf
LINK AL EDITOR
Aporte de:Registro referencial: Solicitar el recurso aquí
LEADER 04162nab a22004097a 4500
001 20181017152017.0
003 AR-BaUFA
005 20221026120423.0
008 181017t2018 it d|||o |||| 00| 0 eng d
999 |c 45962  |d 45962 
999 |d 45962 
999 |d 45962 
999 |d 45962 
022 |a 1932-6203 
024 |a 10.1371/journal.pone.0199811 
040 |a AR-BaUFA 
100 1 |9 30497  |a Quiroga, Raúl Emiliano  |u Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria (INTA). Centro Regional Catamarca - La Rioja. Estación Experimental Agropecuaria Catamarca (EEA Catamarca). Sumalao, Valle Viejo, Catamarca, Argentina. 
245 0 |a Climatic niche shift in the amphitropical disjunct grass Trichloris crinita 
520 |a Plant species disjunctions have attracted the interest of ecologists for decades. We investigated Trichloris crinita, a native C4 perennial grass with disjunct distribution between subtropical regions of North and South America, testing the hypothesis that the species has a similar realized climatic niche in both subcontinents. The climatic niche of T. crinita in North and South America was characterized and compared using presence records and five uncorrelated bioclimatic variables selected according to their ecological importance for the species. We used reciprocal modeling to make geographic projections of the realized niche within each subcontinent. Niche overlap between T. crinita distributions in North and South America was intermediate for the individual climatic variables and the multivariate space. In all cases the test of equivalence between climates inhabited by T. crinita indicated that the realized niche of the species differ significantly between subcontinents. Also, the similarity test showed that in the majority of cases the realized niche in both subcontinents was significantly different than that expected by chance. T. crinita occupied a greater diversity of environments in South than in North America, while in the latter its distribution was displaced to drier and warmer environments. The modeled geographic distribution using the actual occurrences of the species in North America did not accurately predict the distribution in South America, and vice versa. Together, these results led us to reject the hypothesis of similar niche of T. crinita in both subcontinents. This information may be useful to manage restoration efforts by presenting the suitable areas and climates for the species, and suggesting that translocation of individuals between subcontinents could only be recommended with caution because introduced genotypes can be potentially maladaptive, and could colonize sites actually not occupied by the species within each subcontinent. 
653 |a ADULT 
653 |a ARTICLE 
653 |a CLIMATE 
653 |a GENOTYPE 
653 |a GEOGRAPHIC DISTRIBUTION 
653 |a GRASS 
653 |a HUMAN 
653 |a NONHUMAN 
653 |a NORTH AMERICA 
653 |a SOUTH AMERICA 
700 1 |9 49471  |a Premoli, Andrea Cecilia  |u Instituto de Investigaciones en Biodiversidad y Medioambiente (INIBIOMA). Río Negro, Argentina.  |u CONICET. Instituto de Investigaciones en Biodiversidad y Medioambiente (INIBIOMA). Río Negro, Argentina.  |u Universidad Nacional del Comahue. San Carlos de Bariloche, Argentina. 
700 |9 6385  |a Fernández, Roberto Javier  |u Universidad de Buenos Aires. Facultad de Agronomía. Instituto de Investigaciones Fisiológicas y Ecológicas Vinculadas a la Agricultura (IFEVA). Buenos Aires, Argentina.  |u CONICET – Universidad de Buenos Aires. Instituto de Investigaciones Fisiológicas y Ecológicas Vinculadas a la Agricultura (IFEVA). Buenos Aires, Argentina.  |u Universidad de Buenos Aires. Facultad de Agronomía. Departamento de Recursos Naturales y Ambiente. Cátedra de Ecología. Buenos Aires, Argentina. 
773 0 |t Plos One  |g Vol.13, no.6 (2018), e0199811, 16 p. grafs., tbls., mapas 
856 |f 2018quiroga  |i en internet  |q application/pdf  |u http://ri.agro.uba.ar/files/download/articulo/2018quiroga.pdf  |x ARTI201810 
856 |z LINK AL EDITOR  |u https://journals.plos.org 
942 0 0 |c ARTICULO 
942 |c ENLINEA 
976 |a AAG