Effect of different lignocellulosic diets on bacterial microbiota and hydrolytic enzyme activities in the gut of the cotton boll weevil (Anthonomus grandis)

Cotton boll weevils, Anthonomus grandis, are omnivorous coleopteran that can feed on diets with different compositions, including recalcitrant lignocellulosic materials. We characterized the changes in the prokaryotic community structure and the hydrolytic activities of A. grandis larvae fed on diff...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Otros Autores: Ben Guerrero, Emiliano, Soria, Marcelo Abel, Salvador, Ricardo, Ceja Navarro, Javier A., Campos, Eleonora, Brodie, Eoin L., Talia, Paola
Formato: Artículo
Lenguaje:Inglés
Materias:
Acceso en línea:http://ri.agro.uba.ar/files/download/articulo/2016guerrero.pdf
LINK AL EDITOR
Aporte de:Registro referencial: Solicitar el recurso aquí
LEADER 05312nab a22004817a 4500
001 20180910171451.0
003 AR-BaUFA
005 20220421094029.0
008 180910t2016 xxu|||||o|||| 00| 0 eng d
999 |c 45879  |d 45879 
999 |d 45879 
999 |d 45879 
999 |d 45879 
999 |d 45879 
999 |d 45879 
999 |d 45879 
999 |d 45879 
999 |d 45879 
022 |a 1664-302X 
024 |a 10.3389/fmicb.2016.02093 
040 |a AR-BaUFA  |c AR-BaUFA 
245 1 0 |a Effect of different lignocellulosic diets on bacterial microbiota and hydrolytic enzyme activities in the gut of the cotton boll weevil (Anthonomus grandis) 
520 |a Cotton boll weevils, Anthonomus grandis, are omnivorous coleopteran that can feed on diets with different compositions, including recalcitrant lignocellulosic materials. We characterized the changes in the prokaryotic community structure and the hydrolytic activities of A. grandis larvae fed on different lignocellulosic diets. A. grandis larvae were fed on three different artificial diets: cottonseed meal (CM), Napier grass (NG) and corn stover (CS). Total DNA was extracted from the gut samples for amplification and sequencing of the V3-V4 hypervariable region of the 16S rRNA gene. Proteobacteria and Firmicutes dominated the gut microbiota followed by Actinobacteria, Spirochaetes and a small number of unclassified phyla in CM and NG microbiomes. In the CS feeding group, members of Spirochaetes were the most prevalent, followed by Proteobacteria and Firmicutes. Bray–Curtis distances showed that the samples from the CS community were clearly separated from those samples of the CM and NG diets. Gut extracts from all three diets exhibited endoglucanase, xylanase, ß-glucosidase and pectinase activities. These activities were significantly affected by pH and temperature across different diets. We observed that the larvae reared on a CM showed significantly higher activities than larvae reared on NG and CS. We demonstrated that the intestinal bacterial community structure varies depending on diet composition. Diets with more variable and complex compositions, such as CS, showed higher bacterial diversity and richness than the two other diets. In spite of the detected changes in composition and diversity, we identified a core microbiome shared between the three different lignocellulosic diets. These results suggest that feeding with diets of different lignocellulosic composition could be a viable strategy to discover variants of hemicellulose and cellulose breakdown systems. 
650 |2 Agrovoc  |9 26 
653 |a ANTHONOMUS GRANDIS 
653 |a GUT MICROBIOTA 
653 |a 16S RRNA GENE 
653 |a ILLUMINA AMPLICON SEQUENCING 
653 |a HYDROLYTIC ACTIVITIES 
653 |a LIGNOCELLULOSIC FEEDSTOCKS 
700 1 |a Ben Guerrero, Emiliano  |u Centro de Investigación en Ciencias Veterinarias y Agronómicas. Instituto de Biotecnología. Buenos Aires, Argentina.  |u Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria (INTA). Centro Nacional de Investigaciones Agropecuarias. Castelar, Buenos Aires, Argentina.  |9 72934 
700 1 |a Soria, Marcelo Abel  |u Universidad de Buenos Aires. Facultad de Agronomía. Departamento de Biología Aplicada y Alimentos. Cátedra de Microbiología Agrícola. Buenos Aires, Argentina.  |u Universidad de Buenos Aires. Facultad de Agronomía. Instituto de Investigaciones en Biociencias Agrícolas y Ambientales (INBA). Buenos Aires, Argentina.  |u CONICET – Universidad de Buenos Aires. Instituto de Investigaciones en Biociencias Agrícolas y Ambientales (INBA). Buenos Aires, Argentina.  |9 49057 
700 1 |a Salvador, Ricardo  |u Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria (INTA). Centro de Investigación en Ciencias Veterinarias y Agronómicas. Centro Nacional de Investigaciones Agropecuarias. Instituto de Investigación Microbiología y Zoología Agrícola (IMyZA). Hurlingham, Buenos Aires, Argentina.  |u Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria (INTA). Castelar, Buenos Aires, Argentina.  |9 67837 
700 1 |a Ceja Navarro, Javier A.  |u Earth and Environmental Sciences. Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, Berkeley, CA, USA.  |9 67838 
700 1 |a Campos, Eleonora  |u Centro de Investigación en Ciencias Veterinarias y Agronómicas. Instituto de Biotecnología. Buenos Aires, Argentina.  |u Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria (INTA). Centro Nacional de Investigaciones Agropecuarias. Castelar, Buenos Aires, Argentina.  |u CONICET. Buenos Aires, Argentina.  |9 67839 
700 1 |a Brodie, Eoin L.  |u Sciences. Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, Berkeley, CA, USA.  |9 67840 
700 1 |a Talia, Paola  |u Centro de Investigación en Ciencias Veterinarias y Agronómicas. Instituto de Biotecnología. Buenos Aires, Argentina.  |u Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria (INTA). Centro Nacional de Investigaciones Agropecuarias. Castelar, Buenos Aires, Argentina.  |u CONICET . Buenos Aires, Argentina.  |9 67841 
773 |g Vol.7 (2016), art.2093, 123 p., grafs., tbls.  |t Frontiers in Microbiology 
856 |f 2016guerrero  |i En Internet  |q application/pdf  |u http://ri.agro.uba.ar/files/download/articulo/2016guerrero.pdf  |x ARTI201809 
856 |u https://www.frontiersin.org/  |z LINK AL EDITOR 
942 |c ARTICULO 
942 |c ENLINEA 
976 |a AAG