A sensory additive alters grazing behavior and increases milk response to concentrate supplementation in dairy cows

The aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of a sensory additive, incorporated into a starch - based concentrate, on milk production and composition and grazing behavior in pasture - fed dairy cows. Forty - five Holstein cows were used in 15 incomplete 3×2 Latin squares conducted concurrently...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Otros Autores: Nannig, P., Pulido, R. G., Ruiz Albarrán, M., Bargo, Fernando, Tedó, Gemma, Palladino, Rafael Alejandro, Cussen, R., Acuña, J., Sheahan, A. J., Roche, J. R., Ipharraguerre, Ignacio Rodolfo
Formato: Artículo
Lenguaje:Inglés
Materias:
Acceso en línea:http://ri.agro.uba.ar/files/intranet/articulo/2018nannig.pdf
LINK AL EDITOR
Aporte de:Registro referencial: Solicitar el recurso aquí
LEADER 04668cab a22004697a 4500
001 20180815122442.0
003 AR-BaUFA
005 20230405114146.0
008 180815t2018 ne |||||o|||| 00| | eng d
999 |c 45829  |d 45829 
999 |d 45829 
999 |d 45829 
999 |d 45829 
999 |d 45829 
999 |d 45829 
022 |a 1871-1413 
024 |a 10.1016/j.livsci.2018.04.014 
040 |a AR-BaUFA  |c AR-BaUFA 
245 1 0 |a A sensory additive alters grazing behavior and increases milk response to concentrate supplementation in dairy cows 
520 |a The aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of a sensory additive, incorporated into a starch - based concentrate, on milk production and composition and grazing behavior in pasture - fed dairy cows. Forty - five Holstein cows were used in 15 incomplete 3×2 Latin squares conducted concurrently with 3 treatments and 2 periods of 28 d At the beginning of the study, cows averaged 60 ± 17.1 d in milk, 2.2 ± 1.51 parity, 27.5 ± 4.52 kg/d of milk, and 504 kg ± 61.9 of BW (mean ± SD). Cows were assigned to the 15 squares by parity, milk yield, d in milk, and BW and within squares randomly assigned to 3 concentrate treatments that were 1 kg/d of a mineral concentrate (MC), 7 kg/d of a starch - based concentrate (CC), and 7 kg/d of CC supplemented with 30 g/d of a sensory additive (PEC; ProEfficient, Lucta SA, Barcelona, Spain). Cows grazed a perennial ryegrass pasture (Lolium perenne L.) offered at a daily allowance of 30 kg of DM per cow. Supplementation with the starch-based concentrate increased (P less than 0.05) milk yield 4.4 kg/d compared with MC (24.3 .vs. 28.7 kg/d), whereas cows supplemented with PEC produced more (P less than 0.05) milk and energy - corrected milk than CC cows (0.6 and 1.6 kg/d, respectively). As a result, milk response to concentrate supplementation (kg milk/kg concentrate) was improved by PEC. Additionally, PEC increased (Pless than 0.05) milk protein percentage (3.74 vs. 3.43%) and yield (1.08 vs. 0.98 kg/d) compared with CC. Concentrate supplementation increased (P less than 0.05) total DMI, but reduced (P less than 0.05) total daily grazing time (GT) and biting rate (BR) in the evening. Compared with CC, PEC did not affect (P greater than 0.05) total and pasture DMI but increased (P less than 0.05) GT during the first 2 h after the a.m. milking as well as BR and ruminating time during the diurnal hours. The plasma concentration of active ghrelin was similarly reduced (P ess than 0.05) by CC and PEC after 2 h of grazing. In summary, supplementation of a starch - based concentrate with a sensory additive improved milk and protein responses of dairy cows grazing a ryegrass pasture. 
650 |2 Agrovoc  |9 26 
653 |a DAIRY COWS 
653 |a GRAZING BEHAVIOR 
653 |a SUPPLEMENTATION 
653 |a SENSORY ADDITIVE 
700 1 |a Nannig, P.  |u Universidad Austral de Chile. Instituto de Ciencia Animal. Valdivia, Chile.  |9 67735 
700 1 |a Pulido, R. G.  |u Universidad Austral de Chile. Instituto de Ciencia Animal. Valdivia, Chile.  |9 67736 
700 1 |a Ruiz Albarrán, M.  |u Universidad Austral de Chile. Instituto de Ciencia Animal. Valdivia, Chile.  |9 67737 
700 1 |a Bargo, Fernando  |u Universidad de Buenos Aires. Facultad de Agronomía. Escuela para Graduados Ing. Agr. Alberto Soriano (EPG). Buenos Aires, Argentina.  |u Lucta SA. Barcelona, Spain.  |9 10622 
700 1 |a Tedó, Gemma  |u Lucta SA. Barcelona, Spain.  |9 70268 
700 1 |9 51111  |a Palladino, Rafael Alejandro  |u Universidad de Buenos Aires. Facultad de Ciencias Veterinarias. Instituto de Investigaciones en Producción Animal (INPA). Buenos Aires, Argentina.  |u CONICET - Universidad de Buenos Aires. Instituto de Investigaciones en Producción Animal (INPA). Buenos Aires, Argentina.  |u Universidad de Buenos Aires. Facultad de Agronomía. Buenos Aires, Argentina. 
700 1 |a Cussen, R.  |u BestFed. Osorno, Chile.  |9 67739 
700 1 |a Acuña, J.  |u BestFed. Osorno, Chile.  |9 67746 
700 1 |a Sheahan, A. J.   |u DairyNZ Ltd. Hamilton, New Zealand  |9 67807 
700 1 |a Roche, J. R.  |u Universidad Austral de Chile. Instituto de Ciencia Animal. Valdivia, Chile.  |9 41896 
700 1 |9 10603  |a Ipharraguerre, Ignacio Rodolfo  |u Lucta SA. Barcelona, Spain.  |u University of Kiel. Institute of Human Nutrition and Food Science. Kiel, Germany 
773 0 |t Livestock Science  |g Vol.214 (2018), p.106-111, tbls. 
856 |f 2018nannig  |i en reservorio  |q application/pdf  |u http://ri.agro.uba.ar/files/intranet/articulo/2018nannig.pdf  |x ARTI201808 
856 |z LINK AL EDITOR  |u http://www.elsevier.com 
942 |c ARTICULO 
942 |c ENLINEA 
976 |a AAG