Soil arthropod composition differs between old - fields dominated by exotic plant species and remnant native grasslands

Secondary succession after agriculture abandonment (old-fields) is mostly dominated by exotic grass species. Non - native plant invasions may alter soil fauna, potentially inducing plant - soil feedbacks. Despite their importance in nutrient cycling and plant - soil interactions, meso and macrofauna...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Otros Autores: Vilardo, Gimena, Tognetti, Pedro Maximiliano, González Arzac, Adelia, Yahdjian, María Laura
Formato: Artículo
Lenguaje:Inglés
Materias:
Acceso en línea:http://ri.agro.uba.ar/files/intranet/articulo/2018vilardo.pdf
LINK AL EDITOR
Aporte de:Registro referencial: Solicitar el recurso aquí
LEADER 04808nab a22003737a 4500
001 20180815114112.0
003 AR-BaUFA
005 20220310125019.0
008 180815t2018 ne |||||o|||| 00| | eng d
999 |c 45828  |d 45828 
999 |d 45828 
999 |d 45828 
999 |d 45828 
022 |a 1146-609X 
024 |a 10.1016/j.actao.2018.06.003 
040 |a AR-BaUFA 
245 1 0 |a Soil arthropod composition differs between old - fields dominated by exotic plant species and remnant native grasslands 
520 |a Secondary succession after agriculture abandonment (old-fields) is mostly dominated by exotic grass species. Non - native plant invasions may alter soil fauna, potentially inducing plant - soil feedbacks. Despite their importance in nutrient cycling and plant - soil interactions, meso and macrofauna received less attention than bacteria or fungi. Here we compared the composition of the soil arthropod community in native remnants and plant exotic - dominated old - fields grasslands in the Inland Pampa, Argentina. We sampled independent remnants and old - field grassland plots within a 100 km2 agricultural landscape to test the hypothesis that the abundance of soil arthropod organisms is related to the quality of the plant biomass, whereas the diversity of the soil biota is related to plant species richness, resulting in a different soil biota composition because of differing plant communities. When compared to non - invaded remnant grasslands, soil activity and soil food - web characteristics of the old - fields sites included: 1. Higher total arthropod abundance, particularly of Isopoda, Pseudoescorpionida and Blattaria; 2. Lower abundance of Hymenoptera and Enthomobryomorpha (Collembola); 3. Lower diversity, and evenness, but similar richness of soil organisms orders; 4. Higher soil respiration rates and soil temperature; and 5. Higher total soil N and K+content, but lower soil P content. These results illustrate that soil arthropod composition can vary widely within grasslands patches depending on plant species composition. Also, the more diverse plant community of remnant grasslands supports a more diverse soil biota, although soil activity is slower. Our results support the strong linkage between plant community and soil arthropod composition and suggest that changes in soil biota composition might promote plant - soil feedback interactions inducing the persistence of these alternative grassland states in new agricultural human - modified landscapes. 
653 |a PAMPA GRASSLANDS 
653 |a BIOLOGICAL INVASIONS 
653 |a SOIL INVERTEBRATE COMPOSITION 
653 |a ISOPODS 
653 |a HYMENOPTERA 
653 |a SOIL RESPIRATION 
700 1 |a Vilardo, Gimena  |u Universidad de Buenos Aires. Facultad de Agronomía. Departamento de Recursos Naturales y Ambiente. Cátedra de Ecología. Buenos Aires, Argentina.  |u Universidad de Buenos Aires. Facultad de Agronomía. Instituto de Investigaciones Fisiológicas y Ecológicas Vinculadas a la Agricultura (IFEVA). Buenos Aires, Argentina.  |u CONICET – Universidad de Buenos Aires. Instituto de Investigaciones Fisiológicas y Ecológicas Vinculadas a la Agricultura (IFEVA). Buenos Aires, Argentina.  |9 33755 
700 1 |9 12692  |a Tognetti, Pedro Maximiliano  |u Universidad de Buenos Aires. Facultad de Agronomía. Instituto de Investigaciones Fisiológicas y Ecológicas Vinculadas a la Agricultura (IFEVA). Buenos Aires, Argentina.  |u CONICET – Universidad de Buenos Aires. Instituto de Investigaciones Fisiológicas y Ecológicas Vinculadas a la Agricultura (IFEVA). Buenos Aires, Argentina.  |u Universidad de Buenos Aires. Facultad de Agronomía. Departamento de Métodos Cuantitativos y Sistemas de Información. Buenos Aires, Argentina. 
700 1 |9 57795  |a González Arzac, Adelia  |u Universidad de Buenos Aires. Facultad de Agronomía. Departamento de Métodos Cuantitativos y Sistemas de Información. Buenos Aires, Argentina. 
700 1 |9 16176  |a Yahdjian, María Laura  |u Universidad de Buenos Aires. Facultad de Agronomía. Departamento de Recursos Naturales y Ambiente. Cátedra de Ecología. Buenos Aires, Argentina.  |u Universidad de Buenos Aires. Facultad de Agronomía. Instituto de Investigaciones Fisiológicas y Ecológicas Vinculadas a la Agricultura (IFEVA). Buenos Aires, Argentina.  |u CONICET – Universidad de Buenos Aires. Instituto de Investigaciones Fisiológicas y Ecológicas Vinculadas a la Agricultura (IFEVA). Buenos Aires, Argentina. 
773 0 |t Acta oecologica  |w SECS000003  |g Vol.91 (2018), p.57-64, grafs., tbls. 
856 |f 2018vilardo  |i en reservorio  |q application/pdf  |u http://ri.agro.uba.ar/files/intranet/articulo/2018vilardo.pdf  |x ARTI201808 
856 |z LINK AL EDITOR  |u http://www.elsevier.com 
942 |c ARTICULO 
942 |c ENLINEA 
976 |a AAG