XML
<oai_dc:dc xmlns:oai_dc="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/ http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc.xsd"><identifier>I11-R103article-5227</identifier><datestamp>2022-02-17T06:06:50Z</datestamp>
<dc:title xml:lang="en-US">The "repentance" as political affection: between servitude and reparation</dc:title>
<dc:title xml:lang="es-ES">El "arrepentimiento" como afecto político: entre la servidumbre y la reparación</dc:title>
<dc:creator>Sánchez Ceci, Pablo Daniel</dc:creator>
<dc:creator>Levstein, Ana</dc:creator>
<dc:subject xml:lang="es-ES">arrepentimiento</dc:subject>
<dc:subject xml:lang="es-ES">afecto político</dc:subject>
<dc:subject xml:lang="es-ES">deconstrucción</dc:subject>
<dc:subject xml:lang="en-US">repentance</dc:subject>
<dc:subject xml:lang="en-US">political affection</dc:subject>
<dc:subject xml:lang="en-US">deconstruction</dc:subject>
<dc:description xml:lang="en-US">The article presents a critical-deconstructive reading of the “repentant” criminal figure of Argentine law from its incorporation into law 27,304 in 2016 during the neoliberal management of the Alianza Cambiemos. Repentance, as political affection, can be read as a government technology that produces an enunciative place in someone who, having been a criminal agent, is supposed to later collaborate with the law. Using elements from the work of Spinoza and Derrida, we decompose this affect within the framework of the classic ethical-political question: Why do people choose submission as if it were freedom? The aporias of responsibility that are played out in this cultural figure expanded by recent legal discourse, open the possibility of rethinking a repentance of an inverse sign, a political passion capable of repairing the inseparable cruelty of all sovereignty and of interrupting the cycle of micropolitics of the sadness.</dc:description>
<dc:description xml:lang="es-ES">El artículo presenta una lectura crítico-deconstructiva de la figura penal “arrepentido”, del derecho argentino, a partir de su incorporación en la ley 27.304 en el año 2016 durante la gestión neoliberal de la Alianza Cambiemos. El arrepentimiento, como afecto político, puede ser leído como una tecnología de gobierno que produce un lugar enunciativo en alguien que habiendo sido agente delictivo, se supone que colabora luego con la ley. A partir de elementos de la obra de Spinoza y Derrida descomponemos este afecto en el marco de la clásica pregunta ético-política: ¿Por qué las personas elegimos la sumisión como si esta fuera la libertad? Las aporías de la responsabilidad que se juegan en esta figura cultural expandida por el discurso jurídico reciente, abren la posibilidad de repensar un arrepentimiento de signo inverso, una pasión política capaz de reparar la crueldad indisociable de toda soberanía y de interrumpir el ciclo de micropolíticas de la tristeza.</dc:description>
<dc:publisher xml:lang="es-ES">Facultad de Filosofía y Letras, Universidad Nacional de Cuyo</dc:publisher>
<dc:date>2021-12-31</dc:date>
<dc:type>info:eu-repo/semantics/article</dc:type>
<dc:type>info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion</dc:type>
<dc:type xml:lang="es-ES">Artículo evaluado por pares</dc:type>
<dc:format>application/pdf</dc:format>
<dc:identifier>https://revistas.uncu.edu.ar/ojs3/index.php/boletingec/article/view/5227</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>10.48162/rev.43.007</dc:identifier>
<dc:source xml:lang="es-ES">Boletín GEC; Núm. 28 (2021): Miscelánea; 11-32</dc:source>
<dc:source>2618-334X</dc:source>
<dc:source>1515-6117</dc:source>
<dc:language>spa</dc:language>
<dc:relation>https://revistas.uncu.edu.ar/ojs3/index.php/boletingec/article/view/5227/4265</dc:relation>
<dc:rights xml:lang="es-ES">Derechos de autor 2021 Pablo Daniel Sánchez Ceci, Ana Levstein</dc:rights>
<dc:rights xml:lang="es-ES">http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0</dc:rights>
</oai_dc:dc>
Datos convertidos
{
"id": "I11-R103article-5227",
"record_format": "ojs",
"institution": [
"Universidad Nacional de Cuyo"
],
"institution_str": "I-11",
"repository_str": "R-103",
"container_title_str": "Bolet\u00edn GEC",
"language": [
"Espa\u00f1ol"
],
"format": [
"Art\u00edculo revista"
],
"topic": [
"arrepentimiento",
"afecto pol\u00edtico",
"deconstrucci\u00f3n",
"repentance",
"political affection",
"deconstruction"
],
"spellingShingle": [
"arrepentimiento",
"afecto pol\u00edtico",
"deconstrucci\u00f3n",
"repentance",
"political affection",
"deconstruction",
"S\u00e1nchez Ceci, Pablo Daniel",
"Levstein, Ana",
"The \"repentance\" as political affection: between servitude and reparation"
],
"topic_facet": [
"arrepentimiento",
"afecto pol\u00edtico",
"deconstrucci\u00f3n",
"repentance",
"political affection",
"deconstruction"
],
"author": [
"S\u00e1nchez Ceci, Pablo Daniel",
"Levstein, Ana"
],
"author_facet": [
"S\u00e1nchez Ceci, Pablo Daniel",
"Levstein, Ana"
],
"author_sort": "S\u00e1nchez Ceci, Pablo Daniel",
"title": "The \"repentance\" as political affection: between servitude and reparation",
"title_short": "The \"repentance\" as political affection: between servitude and reparation",
"title_full": "The \"repentance\" as political affection: between servitude and reparation",
"title_fullStr": "The \"repentance\" as political affection: between servitude and reparation",
"title_full_unstemmed": "The \"repentance\" as political affection: between servitude and reparation",
"title_sort": "\"repentance\" as political affection: between servitude and reparation",
"description": "The article presents a critical-deconstructive reading of the \u201crepentant\u201d criminal figure of Argentine law from its incorporation into law 27,304 in 2016 during the neoliberal management of the Alianza Cambiemos. Repentance, as political affection, can be read as a government technology that produces an enunciative place in someone who, having been a criminal agent, is supposed to later collaborate with the law. Using elements from the work of Spinoza and Derrida, we decompose this affect within the framework of the classic ethical-political question: Why do people choose submission as if it were freedom? The aporias of responsibility that are played out in this cultural figure expanded by recent legal discourse, open the possibility of rethinking a repentance of an inverse sign, a political passion capable of repairing the inseparable cruelty of all sovereignty and of interrupting the cycle of micropolitics of the sadness.",
"publisher": [
"Facultad de Filosof\u00eda y Letras, Universidad Nacional de Cuyo"
],
"publishDate": [
"2021"
],
"url": [
"https:\/\/revistas.uncu.edu.ar\/ojs3\/index.php\/boletingec\/article\/view\/5227"
],
"work_keys_str_mv": [
"AT sanchezcecipablodaniel therepentanceaspoliticalaffectionbetweenservitudeandreparation",
"AT levsteinana therepentanceaspoliticalaffectionbetweenservitudeandreparation",
"AT sanchezcecipablodaniel elarrepentimientocomoafectopoliticoentrelaservidumbreylareparacion",
"AT levsteinana elarrepentimientocomoafectopoliticoentrelaservidumbreylareparacion",
"AT sanchezcecipablodaniel repentanceaspoliticalaffectionbetweenservitudeandreparation",
"AT levsteinana repentanceaspoliticalaffectionbetweenservitudeandreparation"
],
"first_indexed": "2022-06-20T13:38:42Z",
"last_indexed": "2022-06-20T13:38:42Z",
"bdutipo_str": "Revistas",
"_version_": 1764819786593730561
}