Imágenes del pueblo
The notion of “People” suppose to the tradition of modern philosophy a constituent tension as it refers simultaneously to the “People”, unified, organic, identitarian and representative, considered one and undivided, repository of sovereignty; and “peoples”, crowds who resist, autonomous, needy or e...
Guardado en:
| Autores principales: | , , , |
|---|---|
| Formato: | Artículo publishedVersion |
| Lenguaje: | Español |
| Publicado: |
Universidad Nacional de Avellaneda. Secretaría de Investigación e Innovación Socioproductiva
2015
|
| Materias: | |
| Acceso en línea: | http://rdd.undav.edu.ar/pdfs/pr34/pr34.pdf |
| Aporte de: |
| Sumario: | The notion of “People” suppose to the tradition of modern philosophy a constituent tension as it refers simultaneously to the “People”, unified, organic, identitarian and representative, considered one and undivided, repository of sovereignty; and “peoples”, crowds who resist, autonomous, needy or excluded, insisting in the creation of their own lifestyles, and eluding collective identities stabilized. We seek to problematize, in a genealogical-political level, any idea of a transcendental that separates politics from political practices, or pure politics from politics, as politics of policy that opens the sense of history and an archaeological-aesthetic level, any idea of a philosophical dogma that anticipates the encounter with the works capable of producing their own aesthetic categories. We understand that the image is not the double of one thing but an “equivalent” or problematic “supplement” of sensory experience, which is presented as a complex relationship between the visible and the invisible, and questions the idea of representation as dogmatic image of thought. |
|---|