The Evidence of the BelieverHans Joas´s Reading Max Scheler
In the present work, I would not like to evaluate whether Joas's interpretation of Scheler is relevant or fair, but rather go one step further. I seek to reflect on a central topic, which both Joas and Scheler address, for any believer: evidence. What is evidence for a believer? The approach of...
Guardado en:
| Autor principal: | |
|---|---|
| Formato: | Artículo revista |
| Lenguaje: | Español |
| Publicado: |
EDUCC - Editorial de la Universidad Católica de Córdoba
2025
|
| Materias: | |
| Acceso en línea: | https://revistas.bibdigital.uccor.edu.ar/index.php/SP/article/view/6138 |
| Aporte de: |
| Sumario: | In the present work, I would not like to evaluate whether Joas's interpretation of Scheler is relevant or fair, but rather go one step further. I seek to reflect on a central topic, which both Joas and Scheler address, for any believer: evidence. What is evidence for a believer? The approach of the present work, then, points out that the evidence in Scheler (2007), especially in On the Eternal in Man, has a religious character that goes beyond Husserl' (1967) epistemological approach to the concept of “evidence” in Logical Investigations. In fact, this is one of the topics that Joas values most in his interpretation of Max Scheler. |
|---|