Socio-spatial and socio-territorial movements: agroecological productive resistance actions in Brazil
In recent years, Brazil has been marked by the advance of neoliberal policies, mainly during Jair Messias Bolsonaro’s government. The neoliberal policies, allied to the pandemic consequences, imposed on the sociospatial/socioterritorial movements the need to create new strategies of organization, ar...
Guardado en:
| Autores principales: | , , , , |
|---|---|
| Formato: | Artículo revista |
| Lenguaje: | Español |
| Publicado: |
Instituto de Geografía "Romualdo Ardissone", UBA
2025
|
| Materias: | |
| Acceso en línea: | http://revistascientificas.filo.uba.ar/index.php/RPS/article/view/14531 |
| Aporte de: |
| Sumario: | In recent years, Brazil has been marked by the advance of neoliberal policies, mainly during Jair Messias Bolsonaro’s government. The neoliberal policies, allied to the pandemic consequences, imposed on the sociospatial/socioterritorial movements the need to create new strategies of organization, articulation and struggle to achieve the survival conditions and permanence in land. We aim to analyze, from the Banco de Dados das Lutas por Espaços e Territórios (Database of Struggles of Space and Territory), the actions realized by Brazilian socio-spatial/socio-territorial movements between 2020 and 2021, related to productive resistances with a focus on agroecological actions. In face of lack of actions by the state during the pandemic, the productive resistances actions were evidenced as part of struggle agenda of movements in several fields: in the organizational field with the deepening of collective and cooperative work; in the production field with the realization of agroecological techniques; in the commercialization field with the search for alternatives to the expropriation of peasant income by capital; in the commodity circulation field in order to build new logistical possibilities, etc. This conjecture represents the materialization of the historical process of struggle of the movements to create a development model not governed by the logic of capital, but which is guided by agrarian reform and food sovereignty. |
|---|