Ailton Krenak, a critical perspective in Nature Production? Thinking about Geography from the work Futuro Ancestral [Ancestral Future] (2022)
Neil Smith proposed the production of nature, a category that examines how capital transforms natural resources into value. This global historical-geographical logic encounters resistance from indigenous peoples. A Brazilian resistance to capitalist exploitation generated a non-capitalist way of pro...
Guardado en:
| Autores principales: | , |
|---|---|
| Formato: | Artículo revista |
| Lenguaje: | Español |
| Publicado: |
Instituto de Geografía "Romualdo Ardissone", UBA
2024
|
| Materias: | |
| Acceso en línea: | http://revistascientificas.filo.uba.ar/index.php/RPS/article/view/13262 |
| Aporte de: |
| Sumario: | Neil Smith proposed the production of nature, a category that examines how capital transforms natural resources into value. This global historical-geographical logic encounters resistance from indigenous peoples. A Brazilian resistance to capitalist exploitation generated a non-capitalist way of producing nature. Ailton Krenak, in Futuro Ancestral (2022), highlights this resistance. This will be explored in this work through the criticism of Neil Smith, Antonio Carlos Robert Moraes and Eduardo Viveiros de Castro. How does this text by Ailton Krenak connect to the production theory of nature? What can be the role of indigenous resistance in reflecting on paths for the History of Geography? |
|---|