Disciplinary anatomy and un-disciplined archaeology
The ontological assumptions that are transported with the disciplinary frameworks are what the labeling, the theoretical trenches and the methodological approaches share among them. In this text those shared assumptions are the focus of an anatomical dissection. Next, the ways in which that discipli...
Guardado en:
| Autor principal: | |
|---|---|
| Formato: | Artículo revista |
| Lenguaje: | Español |
| Publicado: |
Instituto de Arqueología, Facultad de Filosofía y Letras, Universidad de Buenos Aires
2013
|
| Materias: | |
| Acceso en línea: | http://revistascientificas.filo.uba.ar/index.php/Arqueologia/article/view/1674 |
| Aporte de: |
| Sumario: | The ontological assumptions that are transported with the disciplinary frameworks are what the labeling, the theoretical trenches and the methodological approaches share among them. In this text those shared assumptions are the focus of an anatomical dissection. Next, the ways in which that disciplinary ontology is recapitulated in border postcolonial postmodern contexts, or territorial entanglements post-disciplinarily intervened. Far from the aim of increasing a disciplinary strength, I prefer, in the third place, to sketch the conditions and solidarities for an un-disciplined archaeology in situation of cross-epistemic conversation. |
|---|