Proceso selectivo y autonomia universitaria. Comentario al fallo "Students for fair admissions, inc. v. president and fellows of Harvard College", Corte Suprema de los Estados Unidos, 29/06/2023
This article provides a commentary on the recent ruling of the United States Supreme Court in the case "Students for Fair Admissions, Inc. v. President and Fellows of Harvard College". It focuses on the vote of Chief Justice Roberts, exploring its relation to the principle of university au...
Guardado en:
| Autor principal: | |
|---|---|
| Formato: | Artículo publishedVersion |
| Lenguaje: | Español |
| Publicado: |
Universidad de Buenos Aires. Facultad de Derecho. Centro para el Desarrollo Docente
2024
|
| Materias: | |
| Acceso en línea: | http://repositoriouba.sisbi.uba.ar/gsdl/cgi-bin/library.cgi?a=d&c=cfdocente&cl=CL1&d=HWA_7840 https://repositoriouba.sisbi.uba.ar/gsdl/collect/cfdocente/index/assoc/HWA_7840.dir/7840.PDF |
| Aporte de: |
| Sumario: | This article provides a commentary on the recent ruling of the United States Supreme Court in the case "Students for Fair Admissions, Inc. v. President and Fellows of Harvard College". It focuses on the vote of Chief Justice Roberts, exploring its relation to the principle of university autonomy and the constitutionality of the admission processes. The article also compares such ruling with the one previously made by the Supreme Court of Argentina in the case "Monges, Analía M. c/Universidad de Buenos Aires U.B.A. s/Resolución 2314/95". |
|---|