Extradición y condenas en rebeldía a la luz de los principios constitucionales de orden público argentinos. El caso italiano
The Argentine Republic and the Italian Republic signed an Extradition Convention on December 9, 1987 in order to regulate extradition requests in both countries. Due to the Italian legislation, an Additional Protocol was signed on march 31, 2003, in which the figure of conviction in absentia and th...
Guardado en:
| Autor principal: | |
|---|---|
| Formato: | Artículo publishedVersion |
| Lenguaje: | Español |
| Publicado: |
Universidad de Buenos Aires. Facultad de Derecho. Departamento de Publicaciones
2022
|
| Materias: | |
| Acceso en línea: | http://repositoriouba.sisbi.uba.ar/gsdl/cgi-bin/library.cgi?a=d&c=pderecho/lecciones&cl=CL1&d=HWA_7743 https://repositoriouba.sisbi.uba.ar/gsdl/collect/pderecho/lecciones/index/assoc/HWA_7743.dir/7743.PDF |
| Aporte de: |
| Sumario: | The Argentine Republic and the Italian Republic signed an Extradition Convention on December 9, 1987 in order to regulate extradition requests in both countries. Due to the Italian legislation, an Additional Protocol was signed on march 31, 2003, in which the figure of conviction in absentia and the requirements that such conviction must meet to conduct an extradition were added. Regardless of the fact that it has not entered into force due to the lack of notification of internal requirements by Italy, it is necessary to analyze whether it is possible in the light of the principles of public policy of the Argentine legal system to grant an extradition on the basis of a sentence passed in absentia or the Protocol should, instead, be declared unconstitutional and an extradition requested in said terms be rejected. -- "Member of the International Criminal Court Simulation Court team representing the UBA in The Hague, Netherlands, in June 2023." |
|---|