TESIS DOCTORAL Políticas y utopías. Los proyectos hacia otra ...
In the truncated experience of developmentalism in Argentina during the sixties, four actors starred in unprecedented articulations in the field of urban culture: the national State, the architectural discipline, the construction industry and the publishing industry. As a result of these exchanges,...
Guardado en:
| Autor principal: | |
|---|---|
| Otros Autores: | |
| Formato: | Tesis doctoral acceptedVersion |
| Lenguaje: | Español |
| Publicado: |
Universidad de Buenos Aires. Facultad de Arquitectura, Diseño y Urbanismo
2024
|
| Materias: | |
| Acceso en línea: | http://repositoriouba.sisbi.uba.ar/gsdl/cgi-bin/library.cgi?a=d&c=aaqtesis&cl=CL1&d=HWA_7575 https://repositoriouba.sisbi.uba.ar/gsdl/collect/aaqtesis/index/assoc/HWA_7575.dir/7575.PDF |
| Aporte de: |
| Sumario: | In the truncated experience of developmentalism in Argentina during the sixties, four actors starred in unprecedented articulations in the field of urban culture: the national State, the architectural discipline, the construction industry and the publishing industry. As a result of these exchanges, urban projects emerged as practices of an alternative idea of the city, giving rise to new forms and collective spaces of living. The observation of this phenomenon inspired various questions formulated in the thesis: what representations about the city and housing emerged from the sinuous confluence between these actors and institutions during the long decade of the sixties?; what tensions occurred between government policies and disciplinary corporations?; and what images or forms were selected and postulated as canonical in the construction of another urbanity?\nWith the idea of planning as its banner, the institutionalization of the ECLAC?s discourse in the American continent, starting after the second post-war period, pointed towards mixed investment between the State and large capital, in order to encourage technological innovation, productive integration and demographic rebalancing. Interventions in the territory, the city and housing were channeled as an instrument from continental politics to national states to support the desired economic development.\nIn Argentina, the relocation of the population residing in precarious settlements and the financing of housing on a massive scale for the middle and popular sectors, gave rise to a wide dissemination of plans and public calls for competitions. This new reality stimulated a professional shift that favored the incorporation of architectural firms and construction companies into the public works scene. From the technical point of view, professionals assimilated certain concepts and images from disciplinary debates in the international context, which shaped a fertile scenario to diversify the proposals on alternative urbanities to the historic city. The selective dissemination and local reinterpretations of these ideas were stimulated by the emergence of a series of specialized publications that cemented a publishing industry oriented towards architecture and urban planning.\nBased on the results of the calls, a select group of these architecture studios stood out, both for the originality of their proposals, as well as for the magnitude of housing units produced. We are referring to MPSGSSV (Manteola, Petchersky, Sánchez Gómez, Santos, Solsona, Viñoly), Staff (Goldemberg, Bielus and Wainstein Krasuk), GGMPU (Guerrero, Gramática, Morini, Pisani and Urtubey) and Miguel Ángel Roca. His unprecedented explorations regarding form, spaces and the design process resulted in urban projects located fragmentarily and disruptively on lands of the consolidated city, or widely implemented on the periphery. In this sense, the thesis investigates the procedures that gave rise to six groups selected as case studies: Soldati (Staff), Aluar, Rioja (MPSGSSV), Lugano (Municipal Housing Commission), SEP 1 (GGMPU) and Santo Domingo (SEA).\n"Policies and utopias. Projects towards another urbanity in Argentina. 1966-1975", deals with the historical dynamics of a late version of modern discourse in the country, the developmental paradigm associated with a singular intervention of the State together with a redefinition of professional and business practice, with radical consequences in the production of the city and the housing market. |
|---|